Author
Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Keywords
Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Comparative studies on nutrients and fatty acids profiles of ostrich,
duck and chicken eggs
(With 2 Tables and One Figure)
By
(Received at 11/9/2005)
دراسـة مقارنة على المکونات الغذائية والأحماض الدهنية
فى بيض النعام والبط والدجاج
فى هذه الدراسة تم فحص الترکيب الکميائى لبيض النعام للوقوف على مدى ملائمته للإستهلاک کبيض للمائدة. وتمت مقارنته ببيض الدجاج والبط. وکذلک تم مقارنة الأحماض الدهنية لبيض النعام مع بيض الدجاج والبط. ولقد أظهرت النتائج أن المحتوى الغذائى لبيض النعام يماثل نظيره لبيض الدجاج والبط. أما بالنسبة للأحماض الدهنية فقد أظهرت النتائج أن بيض النعام يحتوى على کمية من الأحماض الدهنية الغير مشـبعة أحادية النوع أقل من الدجاج والبط وکذلک يحتوى على کمية أکبر من الأحماض الدهنية الغير مشـبعة عديدة النوع من المحتوى الموجود فى الدجاج والبط. ومن هنا يتضح أنه لا يوجد سبب لعدم مشارکة بيض النعام لبيض الدجاج والبط کبيض للمائدة.
Ostrich eggs are studied chemically in the process of investigating their suitability for table consumption. Some comparisons are made between ostrich eggs and those of chicken and duck eggs. The obtained results indicated that the contents of ostrich eggs are similar to those of other chicken and duck eggs in term of proportion of main components and chemical composition. Moreover fatty acid profiles compared between ostrich, chicken and duck eggs revealed that ostrich eggs have reduced portions of monounsaturated fatty acids and increased portion of saturated fatty acids as well as polyunsaturated fatty acids. Although the production of fresh ostrich eggs for consumption is currently not seen as having great potential. There appears to be no reason why those not used as hatching eggs should not be utilized for the human consumption.
Key words: Eggs, ostrich, duck, chicken
The aim of breeding of ostriches is the production of leather and meat. Both products are much sought after, the leather because of its quality and structure, the meat because of its dietetically favorable composition combined with sensorial properties rather like beef than like poultry meat.
Ostrich farming is becoming more popular in many countries of the world. Most of the eggs are used for hatching purposes. Infertility of hatching eggs, however, is one of the major problems in ostrich production (Ciliers and Von Schalkwyk, 1994). A limited number of eggs, mainly from females not mated to males or slightly damaged eggs not acceptable for hatching will generally be available for human consumption or other processing or industrial purposes. Avian eggs provide a well balanced source of nutrients for people of all ages (Cook and Briggs, 1977). The concept of egg quality today embraces both the external and internal characteristics of the egg (Belyavin et al., 1987).
Consume of eggs is available in southern Africa and at smaller amounts, in other centers of breeding. Still they are used as culinary specialties rather than as food stuff, although a wide range of recipes for their preparation is available (Reiner et al., 1995).
Ostrich eggs are used for human consumption on a small scale in certain areas in Egypt. They may be cooked whole (cooking time about 75 min.) or scrambled (De Villies, 1981) and one egg is sufficient for 10-12 servings. Only rare information's on ostrich egg composition are at disposal, regarding minerals and trace elements and their significances for chicken development. However, the extent to which ostrich eggs would be suitable for general consumption is unknown. Analysis of proteins and lipids components of the yolk has yet to be carried out for the ostrich egg (Deeming, 1993). So, the present investigation deals mainly with proteins, fat content and fatty acids profiles of ostrich eggs in comparison with duck and chicken eggs.
A total of thirty non-fertile eggs, ten from each of ostrich, duck and chicken eggs were collected from different breeding farms in Egypt. Chemical analysis of eggs contents was done according to the methods recommended by AOAC (1980). The analysis was done for albumin and yolk (mixed). Dry matter content was obtained after drying at 103 oC in a dryer. Crude protein was calculated from total nitrogen extracted by Kjeldhal's procedure. Fat was extracted with diethyl ether and determined gravimetrically. Ash content was determined following muffle furnace combustion at 600 oC for 18 hr.
For the analysis of the fatty acids, the fats needed were extracted from the samples by acid break down. Analysis was done in the form of methyl-esters into which the fatty acids were converted by the method recommended by Ronald et al., (1991).
Gas chromatography conditions for the analysis of fatty acids profiles were:
* Carrier gas: Helium
* Flow rate: 1.9 ml/min.
* Injector temp.: 250 oC
* Column: ZB-wax 30 m X0.25mmX0.25 um
* Oven temp.: Initial temp. : 50 oC
Initial time: 2 min.
Rate: 10 oC / min.
Final temp.: 250 oC
* Detector: Type: FID
Temp.: 300 oC
Results were presented as mean, minimum & maximum and the comparison was done between each of ostrich, duck and chicken eggs.
Table 1: Proximate composition of the examined ostrich, chicken and duck eggs by % in 100 fresh matter, g/egg. (n=10 for each).
Composition |
|
Ostrich |
Chicken |
Duck |
Moisture |
Min |
69.67 |
68.3 |
63.49 |
Max |
76.61 |
74.9 |
72.54 |
|
Mean |
72.25 |
71.1 |
70.50 |
|
Crude proteins |
Min |
10.00 |
10.50 |
10.25 |
Max |
16.06 |
16.12 |
18.47 |
|
Mean |
11.45 |
12.46 |
13.89 |
|
Crude fat |
Min |
10.3 |
10.65 |
12.86 |
Max |
12.74 |
14.87 |
15.09 |
|
Mean |
11.46 |
12.36 |
14.74 |
|
Ash content |
Min |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.80 |
Max |
2.00 |
1.80 |
1.84 |
|
Mean |
1.31 |
1.46 |
1.27 |
Table 2: Fatty acid composition of the ostrich eggs in comparison with chicken and duck eggs (% in 100 fresh matters) (n= 10).
Types of fatty acid |
Ostrich |
Chicken |
Duck |
|||
Min |
Max |
Mean |
±SE |
Mean |
Mean |
|
Saturated |
17.94 |
36.89 |
32.89 |
1.95 |
30.77 |
28.66 |
C10 : 0 |
0.12 |
0.37 |
0.31 |
0.02 |
0.012 |
0.01 |
C12 : 0 |
0.33 |
0.87 |
0.58 |
0.12 |
0.012 |
0.01 |
C14 : 0 |
1.04 |
1.63 |
1.13 |
0.68 |
0.45 |
0.63 |
C16 : 0 |
14.34 |
27.18 |
25.34 |
1.42 |
23.94 |
22.89 |
C18 : 0 |
1.85 |
5.61 |
4.82 |
2.01 |
6.30 |
5.09 |
C20 : 0 |
0.18 |
0.71 |
0.41 |
0.33 |
0.012 |
0.01 |
C22 : 0 |
0.08 |
0.52 |
0.30 |
0.45 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
Monounsaturated |
32.89 |
41.54 |
36.79 |
2.54 |
52.77 |
68.51 |
C14 : 1 |
1.34 |
2.54 |
1.79 |
1.92 |
1.56 |
3.78 |
C16 : 1 |
8.67 |
10.39 |
9.03 |
0.32 |
5.16 |
5.40 |
C18 : 1 |
22.24 |
26.87 |
24.93 |
0.85 |
45.50 |
58.30 |
C20 : 1 |
0.46 |
1.19 |
0.68 |
1.20 |
0.46 |
0.85 |
C22 : 1 |
0.18 |
0.64 |
0.36 |
0.54 |
0.09 |
0.18 |
Polyunsaturated |
9.22 |
16.84 |
12.58 |
1.34 |
11.04 |
3.00 |
C18 : 2 |
7.80 |
13.3 |
9.66 |
1.05 |
8.54 |
2.12 |
C18 : 3 |
1.42 |
3.54 |
2.92 |
0.58 |
2.50 |
0.88 |
The proximate composition of the whole egg of the different species is comparable in (Table 1, and Fig. 1). Duck eggs contain less water and more fat than that of ostrich and chicken eggs, probably because of the greater heat requirement of the developing embryo (Romanoff and Romanoff, 1949). The fat content of ostrich eggs tends to be lower than that of chicken and ducks eggs. At present the average consumer puts increasing emphasis on the health aspects of food so the lower fat content is valuable tool in marketing strategies to introduce ostrich eggs as a food for the developed countries. Deeming (1993) describes no significant differences in the gross composition between ostrich, chicken and duck eggs.
Analysis of fatty acids detected from C10 to C22 bodies. Fatty acids with longer chains were combined as “else”. The most frequently detected fatty acid was palmitic acid (C16: 0). It shared a part of 25.34, 23.94, 22.89% of the fatty acids in ostrich, chicken and duck eggs respectively. With 24.93, 45.50, and 58.3% C18: 1 (oleic acid) was second frequent fatty acid in the whole ostrich, chicken and duck eggs respectively. Saturated fatty acids had a share in total fatty acids of 32.89, 30.77 and 28.66%. Monounsaturated fatty acids had a share of 36.79, 52.77 and 68.51% and polyunsaturated fatty acids of 12.58, 11.04 and 3.00% for ostrich, chicken and duck eggs respectively.
Fatty acid profiles varied clearly from those of poultry species (Decker and Cantor, 1992). Portions of fatty acids were 3% higher in the ostrich eggs. The same is regarded to polyunsaturated fatty acids. Ostrich eggs showed about 1% higher values compared with that of chicken eggs and 8% higher values compared with duck eggs. On the other hand, monounsaturated fatty acids showed an obesity direction. 30% of the ostrich eggs contained the lowest portions, followed by the chicken eggs 16% higher values than ostrich eggs, and the duck eggs had the highest values.
Greatest agreement in fatty acid portion between ostrich, chicken and duck eggs could be found in linolic acid (C18: 2), differences appeared in myristic acid (C14: 0), oleic acid (C18: 1) and linolenic acid (C18:3). Fatty acids profiles in poultry depend on food composition, age, laying performance and breed, so values for fatty acids may vary between different investigations in a not significant manner (Terens et al., 1994) and leading to differences in comparing them.
From the available information there is no reason why the ostrich eggs cannot be regarded as an acceptable nutritive product for human consumption. Whilst the uniqueness of the ostrich egg may be exploited as a marketing strategy to sell the limited number of surplus hatching eggs that are currently available at a premium price, it seems unlikely in the near future that ostriches will be kept for fresh table egg production. In the meantime, the fresh ostrich eggs which are available may be marketed as an exotic product or possibly after further research of their nutritional values, as a health product, processing of the eggs and storage stability. Studies of eggs processing are important because the large mass of ostrich egg necessitates the development of methods for the production of smaller portions. Investigations of its organoleptic characteristics, details of which are absent from the literature, would be desirable.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1980): Official methods of analysis, 13th Edn. (Washington Dc, AOAC).
Belyavin, C.G.; Boorman, K.N. and Volynchook, J. (1987):Egg quality in individual birds. In: Egg quality-Current Problems and Recent Advance (Eds Wells, R. G. and Belyvain, C. G.), Butterworths, London, pp. 105-121.
Cilliers, S.C. and Von Schalkwyk, S.J. (1994): Volstruisproduksie {Ostrich Production}. Technical booklet. Little Karoo Agriculture Development Center, Oudtshoorn Experimental Farm, P. O. Box 313, Oudtshoorn, 6620, South Africa.
Cook, F. and Briggs, G.M. (1977):Nutritive value of eggs. In: Egg Science and Technology, 2nd Ed. (Eds Stadelman, W. J. and Cotterill, O. J.) AVI Publishing Company Inc., Westport, Connecticut, pp. 92-108.
De Villiers, S.J.A. (1981):Cook and Enjoy South African Cookery Manual, Human and Rosseau, Capc Town, p.46.
Decker, B.A. and Cantor, A.H. (1992):Fatty acids in poultry and egg products. In: Ching, K. C. (ed.) Fatty acids in foods and their health implication. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York.
Deeming, D.C. (1993):The incubation requirements of ostrich (Struthio comelus) eggs and emberyo. In Bryden, D. I. (ed.) Ostrich Odyssey: Proceeding of the meeting of the Australian Ostrich Association Inc. 217, 1-66.
Reiner, G.; Dorau, H.P. and Dzapo, V. (1995):Cholesterol content, nutrient and fatty acid profiles of ostrich (Struthio Camelus) eggs. Arch. Geflügelk. 59 (1), 65-68.
Romanoff, A.L. and Romanoff, A. J. (1949): The avian egg. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.
Ronald, S.; Kirk, T. and Ronald Sawer (1991): Person's composition and analysis of foods. 629-634. Longman Scientific and Technical.
Terens, W.; Acker, L. and Scholtyssok, S. (1994):Ei und Eiprodukte. Paul Parey Verlag, Berlin und Hamburg.