Authors
Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, Giza
Abstract
Keywords
Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, Giza
ROTA VIRUS IN LAYING HENS – CASE REPORT
(With 4 Figures)
By
أحلام عبد الحميد فرغلى ، ليلى عبد الغنى طنطاوى
تم عزل عترة واحدة من فيروس الروتا. تم العزل في بيض خالي من الأمراض وخلايا الزرع النسيجي MA104. ظهر احتقان شديد في الجنين واستدارة في خلايا التشريح النسيجى وتم فحصها بالميکروسکوب الفلورسنت وأظهرت ايجابي. تم التأکد من الفيروس بالميکروسکوب الألکتروني. الحالات المعزول فيها الفيروس کانت مصابة بإسهال شديد وانخفاض في معدل البيض وبالفحص النسيجي لخلايا الأمعاء ظهر تآکل وتنکرز في جدار الخلايا ووجود خلايا وحيدة الخلية فى جدار الأمعاء.
An isolate of rotavirus was recovered from laying hens showing severe diarrhea and drop in egg production. It was isolated in MA104 tissue culture and specific-pathogen free eggs by yolk sac inoculation. It showed rounding in tissue culture and green chiny fluorescence and its identity was confirmed by electron microscopy. Histopathological examination showed desquamation and sloughing of the intestinal mucosa as well as mononuclear cell infiltration of the lamina propria.
Rotaviruses are now established as a major cause of enteritis and diarrhea in a wide range of mammalian species including humans (Tziportl, 1985).
Rotaviruses infection in avian species was first reported in 1977 by Bergeland et al. who found particles morphologically indistinguishable from rotavirus in intestinal contents of turkey poults with watery dropping and increased mortality. Since then, it has become apparent that rotaviruses infect many species of domestic birds and love birds (Gouph et al., 1988).
As in mammals, rotavirus infection in avian species is frequently associated with outbreaks of diarrhea. Rotaviruses from turkeys and pheasants can infect chickens (Yason and Schat, 1986; Wani et al., 2003). Rotavirus group A cause an infection in birds, gene sequence and other data provide convincing evidence that this virus originated from pigeons (Brisaw et al., 1992).
Rota virus are classified as genus in the family Reoviridae, 70 – 75 nm in diameter double standard RNA genome consisting of 11 segments.
Isolation of rotavirus from faeces or intestinal content of chickens, pheasants, ducks and pigeons have been made in primary chick kidney and chick embryo liver culture (Andral et al., 1985; Brisaw et al., 1992). Although chicks rotavirus grow better in (MA 104) (Myersand Shoat, 1989).
In this study intestinal contents from ileum showed orange diarrhea and drop in egg production were taken for trial of isolation.
A Layer farm in Alexandria “Smoha” 9-10 month old showed drop in egg production 60-70% and orange soft diarrhea. Intestinal contents from ileum treated with antibiotic and centrifugated at 3000 rpm for 20 minutes. The supernatant fluid was used for virus isolation in tissue culture (MA 104) and pathogen free egg (Yolk sac), three passages were done. Trypsin (5 microns per ml) was added to media used for cell culture.
Electron microscopy:
Viral suspension from the third passage (MA 104) was centrifuged and supernatant stained with negative stain and examined by electron microscope cover slips emerged in the 3rd tissue culture suspension stain for fluorescent and examined by indirect method (positive serum from D. Hussein A.H.) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Virological Section.
Intestinal part stained by haematoxilin and eosin and examined by light microscope.
Tissue culture showed rounding after 24 hours in all of the three passage. Inoculated egg embryo were severely congested. Electron microscope showed virus particle (Fig. 1). Fluorescent microscope showed green fluorescent colouration (Fig. 2).
Histopathological lesions:
The lesion of the intestinal mucosa comprised necrosis of the epithelium sometimes atrophy, desquamation and sloughing of the villi. Shortening of villi could be seen (Fig. 3).
The lamina propria infiltrated with mononuclear cells (Fig. 4) and serosal layer showed thickening and vacuolation.
Virus isolated from laying hens in MA104 and this agree with Myer and Schat (1989) and serial propagation in all culture required treatment with trypsin (Kapikin and Canock, 1996). The isolates showed cytopathic effect from the first passage which disagree with McNutly et al. (1981) who need 19 passage to show positive result rest in chick liver cell. From this work we concluded that MA104 is faster cell for isolation from hens.
A rotavirus was lethal for chick embryo following yolk sac (6 – 8 day old) inoculation result in death after 3 – 5 days and this agree with Gouph et al. (1988).
The disease was characterized by diarrhea, drop in egg production in laying hens and 92 weeks (Jones et al., 1979).
Virus was detected by electron photograph such asMcNutly et al. (1984).
Histopathological intestinal mucosa comprised necrosis of the epithelium and atrophy and this agree with Meuleman et al. (1985), lamina propria infiltrated with mononuclear cells as reported by Yason et al. (1987).
We are grateful to Dr. A.Agag and Dr. O. Hussein A.H. for their help.
Andral, B.D.; Toquih, R.L.; Hardon, A.; Jestin, M.H.; Metz and Rose, R. (1985): Le diarehea du dindemant au bian des recherches virales effectures (rotavirus, reo virus, denovirus pseudo picornavirus). Avian Path. 14: 147 – 162
Bergeland, M.E.; Mc Adaragh, J.P. and Stotz, I. (1977): Rotaviral enteritis in turkey poults. Proc. 26th West. Poult. Dis. Conf., 129 – 130.
Brisaw, I.T.; Nakagoni, O.; Minamato, N. and Eichhorn, W. (1992): Rotavirus 993 / 83 isolated from culture can closely resemble an avian rotavirus. J. Gen. Virol., 37: 1873-1875.
Gouph, R.E.; Collins, M.S.; Wood, G.W. and Lister, S.A. (1988): Isolation of a chicken embryo lethal rotavirus from a love bird (Aga pornis species). Vet. Rec. 122: 363-364.
Jones, R.C.; Hughes, C.S. and Henry, R. (1979): Rotavirus infection in commercial laying hens. Vet. Rec., 104: 22.
Kapikin, A.Z. and Chanock, R.M. (1996): Rotavirus in D.N. Fields. D.M. Kripe; P.M. Howley; R.M. Chancock; J.L. Melnick; T.P. Monath; B. Roizman and S.E. Stranscend, Field Virology. Third Edition, Vol. 2. Lippincott, Raven, Philadelphia, 1687-1708.
McNulty, M.S.; Allan, C.M.; Tod, J.B.; Mc Ferrand and McCracken, R.M. (1981): Isolation from chicken of a Rotavirus lacking the Rota virus group antigen. J. Gen. Virol., 55: 405-417.
McNulty, M.S.; Todd, D.; Alan, G.M.; Mcferran, J.B. and Agerente, J. (1984): Epidemiology of rotavirus infection in birds chicken recognition of four subgroups. Arch. Virol., 81: 113-121.
Meulemans, G.; Peeters, J.E. and Halen, P. (1985): Experimental infection of broiler chickens with rotavirus. Br. Vet. J., 141: 69-73.
Myers, T.J. and Schat, K.A. (1989): Propagation of avian rotavirus in primary chicken kidney and MA 104 cell culture. Avian Dis., 3: 578-581.
Tziport, S. (1985): The relative importance of enteric pathogenic affecting neonates of domestic mammals. Adv. Vet. Sci. Comp. Med., 29: 103-106.
Wani, S.A.; Shat, M.A.; Ishad, S.M.; Ashraf, M.A.; Puch, A.S. and Hag, M. (2003): Detection of mammalian-like group A rotavirus in diarrhea chicken. Vet. Microbiol., 1 (13): 42-49.
Yason, C.V. and Schat, K.A. (1986): Pathogenesis of Rotavirus infection in turnkeys poults. Avian Pathol., 15: 421-435.
Yason, C.V. and Schat, K.A. (1987): Experimental infection of specific pathogen free chickens with avian rotavirus. Avian Dis., 551-556.
Yason, C.V.; Summers, D.A. and Schat, K.A. (1987): Pathogenesis of rotavirus infection in various age groups of chickens and Turkeys: Pathology. Am. J. Vet. Res., 927-938.
Fig. 1: Virus particle by electron microscope.
Fig. 2: Tissue culture showing positive fluorescent.
Fig. 3: Lumen of intestine showing sloughing and desquamation necrotic intestinal mucous (H and E X 100).
Fig. 4: Lamina propria infiltrated with mononuclear cell (H and E X 100).
)
View on SCiNiTO