Transport of Preimplantation Embryos in the Genitalia of Buffalo Heifers Superovulated with pFSH and Variable Doses of LH

Document Type : Research article

Authors

Dept.Theriogenology, Fac.Vet. Medicine, Assiut Univ., Assiut,Egypt.

Abstract

Twelve buffalo heifers of similar age (21-25 month) and body weight (325-385 kg) were superovulated during mid luteal phase using pFSH (total 65 NIH unit Super-Ov divided into 6 equal dose, 1.4 ml each, for 3 consecutive days) and lutalyse (25mg injected with the 5th injection). To improve the ovarian response to the variable doses of  LH (0,2,4,5,7 and 10 thousands USP Unit, Steris, Lab. Inc Phoenix, Arizona) were injected at the morning of the 4th day of the treatment in 6 trials  (n=2 ). Fertile bulls were allowed to mount heifers frequently after 24 hour (h) from onset of estrus. Heifers were classified into 3 equal groups (2 trials/each) which slaughtered at various time intervals from the onset of estrus: 72-89, 100-106 and 118-120 (h). After slaughter, the intact genitalia were dissected free and transported to the lab in a thermos container at 4C°. The number of newly formed corpora lutea (CL) and unovulated large follicles (UF) in both ovaries were done. Flushings of the oviduct and uterine horn were performed separately using phosphate buffer saline to identify the numbers and locations of embryos.
The duration of estrus(h),numbers of CL and UF were 41.5± 11.2, 3.1±1.3 and 1.1±0.76 respectively. The overall ovulation and embryo recovery rates were 72.5 and 54% respectively.Group without LH gave low response (50 and 0% respectively). The higher ovulation rate(66-100%) were recorded for heifers supplemented with 4000 and more USP unit LH while the higher embryo recovery rates (50-100%) were associated with the doses of 4000-7000 unit .
At 72-89h postestrus (48-65h post-insemination) 6 embryos were collected from the oviducts and one embryo from the uterus. Some non-motile spermatozoa were observed in the oviduct. At 100-106 and 118-120 h postestrus (76-82 and 94-96 h post-insemination)7 and 6 embryos were recovered respectively from the uterus. The rate of embryo transport in the oviduct of superovulated buffalo heifers appeared to be 30 h and more faster than in buffalo or bovine cows.
 

Keywords


Transport of Preimplantation Embryos in the Genitalia of Buffalo Heifers Superovulated with pFSH and Variable Doses of LH

 

A.M. Osman and S.H. Shehata

 

Dept.Theriogenology, Fac.Vet. Medicine, Assiut Univ., Assiut,Egypt.

 

SUMMARY

 

Twelve buffalo heifers of similar age (21-25 month) and body weight (325-385 kg) were superovulated during mid luteal phase using pFSH (total 65 NIH unit Super-Ov divided into 6 equal dose, 1.4 ml each, for 3 consecutive days) and lutalyse (25mg injected with the 5th injection). To improve the ovarian response to the variable doses of  LH (0,2,4,5,7 and 10 thousands USP Unit, Steris, Lab. Inc Phoenix, Arizona) were injected at the morning of the 4th day of the treatment in 6 trials  (n=2 ). Fertile bulls were allowed to mount heifers frequently after 24 hour (h) from onset of estrus. Heifers were classified into 3 equal groups (2 trials/each) which slaughtered at various time intervals from the onset of estrus: 72-89, 100-106 and 118-120 (h). After slaughter, the intact genitalia were dissected free and transported to the lab in a thermos container at 4C°. The number of newly formed corpora lutea (CL) and unovulated large follicles (UF) in both ovaries were done. Flushings of the oviduct and uterine horn were performed separately using phosphate buffer saline to identify the numbers and locations of embryos.

The duration of estrus(h),numbers of CL and UF were 41.5± 11.2, 3.1±1.3 and 1.1±0.76 respectively. The overall ovulation and embryo recovery rates were 72.5 and 54% respectively.Group without LH gave low response (50 and 0% respectively). The higher ovulation rate(66-100%) were recorded for heifers supplemented with 4000 and more USP unit LH while the higher embryo recovery rates (50-100%) were associated with the doses of 4000-7000 unit .

At 72-89h postestrus (48-65h post-insemination) 6 embryos were collected from the oviducts and one embryo from the uterus. Some non-motile spermatozoa were observed in the oviduct. At 100-106 and 118-120 h postestrus (76-82 and 94-96 h post-insemination)7 and 6 embryos were recovered respectively from the uterus. The rate of embryo transport in the oviduct of superovulated buffalo heifers appeared to be 30 h and more faster than in buffalo or bovine cows.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

          Field application of recent technology in cattle reproduction still facing a lot of problems in buffaloes. Embryo transfer technique which had been well refined in cattle breeding required more scientific researches to be favourably used in buffalo.

 

          The rate of embryo transport in the oviduct is a matter of vital significance to optimise the day of non surgical collection of embryos from the uterus. In superovulated cows, Hackett et al., (1993) cited that embryos were found in the oviduct upto 6 days from insemination. In superovulated buffalo cows, Drost (1991) reported that embryos reached the uterus arround days 4 to 5 after the onset of estrus. Misra et al., (1998) found that ova/embryos reached the uterus about 134 (h) after the onset of superovulatory estrus in buffalo cows.

The available literature lack similar informations on superovulated buffalo-heifers. Within the scope of this topic, Desaulniers et al., (1995) reported poor response to superovulation in mature cows when compared to heifers less than 2 years old.

          Ismail et al., (1993) reported that administration of LH with FSH improved ovarian response in superovulated buffalo cows. Osman et al. , (2001) found that addition of 2000 unit LH improved significantly the ovulation rate in superovulated  buffalo cows in comparison to the control while buffalo heifers showed the lowest level of ovarian response.

          Donaldson et al., (1986) cited that excessive LH during treatment to induce superovulation resulted in low rates of fertilization in cow. Thus, optimisation of LH dose might be benefit to get better response.

 

          The aim of the present experiment is to investigate the transport  of pre- implantation embryos in the oviduct and uterus of superovulated buffalo heifers. Trials were also performed during the experiment to improve the ovulation and embryo recovery rates using variable doses of LH injected as an additive to the superovulatory regieme.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 

          Twelve buffalo heifers of similar age (21-25 month) and body weight (325-385 kg) were used for the present experiment.

          These animals were healthy, non pregnant,cycling and selected from a local governamental buffalo farm at El-Hawatka Station, Assiut.

          All animals were kept in the farm under the same feeding and management systems. The buffalo heifers were assigned to be at mid luteal phas before starting the superovulatory treatment.

          A dose of 1.4 ml Super-Ov contained 12.5 NIH pFSH (Mfd.W.S. Montreal Inc. Canada) was injected i.m. morning and evening for 3 successive days. At the morning of the 3ed day, 5 ml lutalyse contained 25 mg PGF2a   was injected at the time of the 5th FSH injection.

          As a trial to improve ovarian response and embryo recovery rate variable doses of LH (0,2,4,5,7 and 10 thousands USP unit, Steris, Lab, Inc Phoenix, Arizona) were injected at the morning of the 4th day of the treatment in 6 trials each with 2 heifers.

          Fertile buffalo bulls were allowed to mount heifers frequently after 24 hours (h) from the onset of estrus.

          The superovulated buffaloes were kept untied in open yard. The onset and duration of heat were recorded through close observation by 2 herdsmen in the farm.

          Heifers were classified into 3 equal groups (2 trials/each) which slaughtered at variable time intervals from the onset of estrus: 72-80, 100-106 and 118-120 (h).

         

After slaughter, the intact genitalia were dissected free and transported to the lab in a Thermos container at 4C°. The number of follicles and corpora lutea in both ovaries were taken. Flushings of the oviduct and uterine horn were performed separately using phosphate buffer saline to identify the numbers and locations of embryos.

 

Data obtained were expressed as Mean ± St.Dev. and  analyzed statistically using Costat Computer program (1986) .

 

RESULTS

 

          The overall duration of estrus (h) was 41.5 ± 11.2 while the overall numbers of CL and UF were 3.1 ± 1.3 and 1.1 ± 0.76 respectively (Table 1) . The onset of oestrus began within 24 (h)  from the last pFSH in jection. The results of this experiment were distributed according to the time of slaughter in Table 2 .

 

          At 72-89h postestrus (48-65h post-insemination) 6 embryos were collected from the oviducts and one embryo from the uterus. Meaning that 14% of embryos could reached the uterus at this early period. Some non-motile spermatozoa were observed in the oviduct.  The case in which one embryo could be recovered from the uterus at this early period, received 7000 USP unit LH.

          After this period all embryos located the uterus. At 100-106 and 118-120 h postestrus (76-82 and 94-96 h postinsemination ) 7 and 6 embryos were recovered respectively from the uterus.

Both ovulation and embryo recovery rates were nearly simillar among the different periods of slaughter.

 

          Table 3 showed the results distributed according to the variable doses of LH additives. The higher ovulation rates (66-100%) were recorded for heifers supplemented with 4000 and more USP  unit LH while the higher embryo recovery rates (50-100%) were associated with the doses of 4000-7000 unit .

 

DISCUSSION

 

          The recovery of single preimplantion embryo in the uterus of superovulated heifer as early as 72-89 h postestrus or 48-65 h post insemination denoted a faster rate of transport by at least 30 (h) and more than  those reported in cattle and buffalo by Newcomb et al., (1976) and Misra et al., (1998) respectively. The low embryo recovery rates reported in the present study are in comparable to those reported in superovulated cows and buffaloes by Donaldson (1985) and Baruselli et al., (1994) respectively. The last authors declared that low embryo recoveries in buffalo may be explained by a failure of oocytes to enter the oviduct after superstimulation of follicular growth. Moreover, Osman et al., (2001) focused about the transfer of some unovulated follicles to cysts with consequent reduction in the number of oocytes entering the oviduct.

 

          The overwhelming majority of our data in this experiment suports the conclusion that nonsurgical embryo transfer in buffalo heifers can be carried out successfully as early as the 4th or 5th day from insemination to avoid rapid growth and hatching of the morula. There are conflicting reports regarding the hatching of blastocyst on day 5 (Karaivanov et al., 1987) or day 6 to 7 (Alexiev et al., 1988) in buffalo. In this work all embryos located the uterus at 76-82 (h) post insemination (about 3 to 3.5 day).

 

          It might be of interest in relation to LH additives, that all heifers received LH gave higher ovarian response than the control group without LH. Moreover, a dose ranged between 4000 and 7000 USP unit LH appeared much appropriate to induce the best ovulation and embryo recovery rates in buffalo heifers. Conflicting results were recorded in cow and buffalo cows with authors used lower doses of LH (1500-3000 IU LH) as cited by Sugie et al., (1980), Ismail et al., (1993) and Osman et al., (2001). The argument developed in this aspect could be traced from the review of Mapletoft and Pierson (1993) who suggest that maximum acceptable level of LH contamination to an FSH preparation is between 15-20% of the original LH content of the extract. It seems possible that buffalo heifers might need such high dose of LH in addition to pFSH to express favourable response  with superovulation and embryo recovery.     

 

REFERENCES

 

Alexiev,A. ; Vlahov,K. ; Karivanov,Ch; Kacheva,D.; Polykhronov,O; Petrov,M.; Nikolov, N. ; Drogoev, A. and Radev, P. (1988): Embryo transfer in buffaloes in Bulgaria. Proc II World buffalo Congress, 11: 591-595.

Baruselli, P. S. ; Madureira, E. H. ; Visintin, J. A. ; Porto-Filho, R. ; Carvalho, N. A. T. ; Campanile, G. and Zicarelli, L. (1994) : Failure of oocyte entry into oviduct in superovulated buffalo . Theriogenology, 41, 330.

Costat Computer Program (1986) : Version 3.03 , Copyright Costat Computer Programm Software.

Desaulniers, D. M. ; Lussier, J.G. ; Goff, A. K. ; Bousquet, D. and Guilbault,L.A. (1995): Follicular development and reproductive endocrinology during and after superovulation in heifers and mature cows displaying contrasting superovulatory responses. Theriogenology , 44, 479.

Donaldson,L.E (1985) : Estimation of superovulation response in donor cows. Vet. Rec. Jul. 13, 117, 2 : 33-4.

Donaldson, L. E. , Word, D. N. and Glenn, S.D. (1986) : Use of porcine follicle stimulating hormone after chromatographe purification in superovulation in cattle. Theriogenology, 25, 747.

Drost,M. (1991): Training Manual for Embryo Transfer in Water buffalo. FAO Animal Production and Health. Paper 84, FAO of the United Nations, Rome.

Hackett, A. J. ; Durnford, R. ; Mapletoft, R. J. and Marcus, G. J. (1993): Location and status of embryos in the genital tract of superovulated cows 4 to 6 days after insemination. Theriogenology, 40 , 1147.

Ismail, S.T. ; Abboud, M. Y. ; Tawfik, M. S. ; Essawi, S. and Mohamed, K. M. (1993) : Effects of HCG and GnRH on the ovulation rate and embryo production in buffalo cows superovulated with PMSG. Buffalo J. 9, 129.

Karaivanov, C. ; Kacheva, D. ; Petrov, M. ; Kacheva, D. ; Stojanova, M. ; Alexiev, A. ; Polihronov, O. and Danev, A. (1987) : Studies on preimplantation development of buffalo embryo. Theriogenology, 28, 747.

Mapletoft, R. J. and Pierson, R. A. (1993) : Factors affecting superovulation in the cow : practical considerations. IETS Embryo Transfer Newsl. , 11, 15.

Misra, A. K. ; Kasiraj, R. ; Mutha R. ,M. ; Rangreddy, N. S. ; Jaiswal, R. S. and Pant, H. C. (1998) : Rate of transport and development preimplantation embryo in the superovulated buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology, 50, 637.

Newcomb, R. ; Rowson,L. E. A. and Trounson, A. O. (1976): The entry of superovulated eggs into the uterus. In Rowson LEA (ed). Egg Transfer in Cattle. Luxembourg: Commission European Communities.

Osman, A. M. ; Shehata, S. H. and Megahed, G. A. (2001) : Superovulatory response and embryo recovery in buffalo heifers and cows treated with FSH (Super-ov) and LH. Vet. Med. , J. Giza. Vol. 49, 3, 483.

Sugie,T. ; Seidel, J. R. and Hafez, E. S. E. (1980) : Embryo Transfer: Reproduction in Farm Animals. Hafez E. S. E. (ed). 4th Ed. Lea and Febiger. Philadelphia : PP. 569.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1: Durations of estrus (h) and numbers of corpora lutea (CL)    and unovulated large follicles (UF) in superovulated

buffalo heifers

 

Buffalo

Heifers

Doses of LH

(USP Units)

Durations

of Estrus (h)

Numbers of

CL

Numbers of

UF

 (>8 mm)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

00

00

2000

2000

4000

4000

5000

5000

7000

7000

10000

10000

46

46

30

52

36

34

40

33

54

67

30

30

2

1

2

2

4

5

5

4

2

4

2

4

2

1

2

2

1

0

1

0

1

2

0

1

Mean ± St.Dev.

 

41.5 ±  11.2

3.1 ±  1.3

1.1 ±  0.76

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 : Results distributed according to the time of slaughter

from onset of estrus in superovulated buffalo heifers

 

Time of slaughter from

Onset of Estrus

 

 

Number of New

 

CL

 

Number

of

 

UF

 

Ovulation Rate

 

(%)

 

Number of Recovered

Embryos

 

Embryo

Recovery

Rate

(%)

(hour)

 

4-8

mm

>8

mm

 

Oviduct

Uterus

 

72-89

(48-65) §

3.0 ± 1.0

(2-4)

5.5 ± 2.8

(3-10)

1.0 ± 0.7

(1-2)

78.0 ± 13.92

(66-100)

1.5 ± 1.1

(1-3)

0.5 ± 0.3

(0-1)

50.0 ± 35.35

(0-100)

100-106

(76-82) §

3.0 ± 1.58

(1-5)

4.0 ± 1.58

(2-6)

1.0            ± 0.7

(1-2)

70.0 ± 21.21

(50-100)

 

-

1.75 ± 1.78

(0-4)

38.75 ± 38.79

(0-80)

118-120

(94-96) §

3.25 ±1.2

(2-5)

4.5 ± 1.5

(3-6)

1.25 ± 0.82

(0-2)

70.8 ± 21.6

(50-100)

 

-

1.5 ± 1.11

(0-2)

40.0 ±23.45

(0-60)

 

Mean ± St.Dev.         CL= Corpora lutea      UF = Unovulated follicles

(- ) § Postinsemination periods                       n= 4/each group                   (  )   Range

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 3 : Results distributed according to the   different dosses of LH additives in superovulated buffalo heifers

 

 

Doses of

LH

(U S P Unit)

 

 

Number of New CL/animal

 

Number of

UF/animal

 

Ovulation Rate

(%)

 

Number of Recovered Embryos

 

Embryo

Recovery Rate

 

(%)

 

 

4-8 mm

>8 mm

 

 

 

 

Case 1

Case 2

Case 1

Case 2

Case 1

Case 2

Case 1

Case 2

Case

1

Case 2

Case

1

Case

2

 

00

 

2000

 

4000

 

5000

 

7000

 

10000

 

2

 

2

 

4

 

5

 

2

 

2

 

1

 

2

 

5

 

4

 

4

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

2

 

3

 

3

 

10

 

6

 

6

 

3

 

3

 

3

 

6

 

2

 

2

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

0

 

 

1

 

2

 

0

 

0

 

2

 

1

 

50

 

50

 

80

 

83

 

66

 

100

 

50

 

50

 

100

 

100

 

66

 

80

 

0

 

1

 

3

 

3

 

1

 

0

 

 

0

 

0

 

4

 

2

 

4

 

2

 

0

 

50

 

75

 

60

 

50

 

0

 

 

0

 

0

 

80

 

50

 

100

 

50

 

CL = Corpora lutea                         UF = Unovulated follicle

 

 

 

Alexiev,A. ; Vlahov,K. ; Karivanov,Ch; Kacheva,D.; Polykhronov,O; Petrov,M.; Nikolov, N. ; Drogoev, A. and Radev, P. (1988): Embryo transfer in buffaloes in Bulgaria. Proc II World buffalo Congress, 11: 591-595.
Baruselli, P. S. ; Madureira, E. H. ; Visintin, J. A. ; Porto-Filho, R. ; Carvalho, N. A. T. ; Campanile, G. and Zicarelli, L. (1994) : Failure of oocyte entry into oviduct in superovulated buffalo . Theriogenology, 41, 330.
Costat Computer Program (1986) : Version 3.03 , Copyright Costat Computer Programm Software.
Desaulniers, D. M. ; Lussier, J.G. ; Goff, A. K. ; Bousquet, D. and Guilbault,L.A. (1995): Follicular development and reproductive endocrinology during and after superovulation in heifers and mature cows displaying contrasting superovulatory responses. Theriogenology , 44, 479.
Donaldson,L.E (1985) : Estimation of superovulation response in donor cows. Vet. Rec. Jul. 13, 117, 2 : 33-4.
Donaldson, L. E. , Word, D. N. and Glenn, S.D. (1986) : Use of porcine follicle stimulating hormone after chromatographe purification in superovulation in cattle. Theriogenology, 25, 747.
Drost,M. (1991): Training Manual for Embryo Transfer in Water buffalo. FAO Animal Production and Health. Paper 84, FAO of the United Nations, Rome.
Hackett, A. J. ; Durnford, R. ; Mapletoft, R. J. and Marcus, G. J. (1993): Location and status of embryos in the genital tract of superovulated cows 4 to 6 days after insemination. Theriogenology, 40 , 1147.
Ismail, S.T. ; Abboud, M. Y. ; Tawfik, M. S. ; Essawi, S. and Mohamed, K. M. (1993) : Effects of HCG and GnRH on the ovulation rate and embryo production in buffalo cows superovulated with PMSG. Buffalo J. 9, 129.
Karaivanov, C. ; Kacheva, D. ; Petrov, M. ; Kacheva, D. ; Stojanova, M. ; Alexiev, A. ; Polihronov, O. and Danev, A. (1987) : Studies on preimplantation development of buffalo embryo. Theriogenology, 28, 747.
Mapletoft, R. J. and Pierson, R. A. (1993) : Factors affecting superovulation in the cow : practical considerations. IETS Embryo Transfer Newsl. , 11, 15.
Misra, A. K. ; Kasiraj, R. ; Mutha R. ,M. ; Rangreddy, N. S. ; Jaiswal, R. S. and Pant, H. C. (1998) : Rate of transport and development preimplantation embryo in the superovulated buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology, 50, 637.
Newcomb, R. ; Rowson,L. E. A. and Trounson, A. O. (1976): The entry of superovulated eggs into the uterus. In Rowson LEA (ed). Egg Transfer in Cattle. Luxembourg: Commission European Communities.
Osman, A. M. ; Shehata, S. H. and Megahed, G. A. (2001) : Superovulatory response and embryo recovery in buffalo heifers and cows treated with FSH (Super-ov) and LH. Vet. Med. , J. Giza. Vol. 49, 3, 483.
Sugie,T. ; Seidel, J. R. and Hafez, E. S. E. (1980) : Embryo Transfer: Reproduction in Farm Animals. Hafez E. S. E. (ed). 4th Ed. Lea and Febiger. Philadelphia : PP. 569.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Table 1: Durations of estrus (h) and numbers of corpora lutea (CL)    and unovulated large follicles (UF) in superovulated
buffalo heifers
 
Buffalo
Heifers
Doses of LH
(USP Units)
Durations
of Estrus (h)
Numbers of
CL
Numbers of
UF
 (>8 mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
00
00
2000
2000
4000
4000
5000
5000
7000
7000
10000
10000
46
46
30
52
36
34
40
33
54
67
30
30
2
1
2
2
4
5
5
4
2
4
2
4
2
1
2
2
1
0
1
0
1
2
0
1
Mean ± St.Dev.
 
41.5 ±  11.2
3.1 ±  1.3
1.1 ±  0.76
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Table 2 : Results distributed according to the time of slaughter
from onset of estrus in superovulated buffalo heifers
 
Time of slaughter from
Onset of Estrus
 
 
Number of New
 
CL
 
Number
of
 
UF
 
Ovulation Rate
 
(%)
 
Number of Recovered
Embryos
 
Embryo
Recovery
Rate
(%)
(hour)
 
4-8
mm
>8
mm
 

Oviduct

Uterus

 
72-89
(48-65) §
3.0 ± 1.0
(2-4)
5.5 ± 2.8
(3-10)
1.0 ± 0.7
(1-2)
78.0 ± 13.92
(66-100)
1.5 ± 1.1
(1-3)
0.5 ± 0.3
(0-1)
50.0 ± 35.35
(0-100)
100-106
(76-82) §
3.0 ± 1.58
(1-5)
4.0 ± 1.58
(2-6)
1.0            ± 0.7
(1-2)
70.0 ± 21.21
(50-100)
 
-
1.75 ± 1.78
(0-4)
38.75 ± 38.79
(0-80)
118-120
(94-96) §
3.25 ±1.2
(2-5)
4.5 ± 1.5
(3-6)
1.25 ± 0.82
(0-2)
70.8 ± 21.6
(50-100)
 
-
1.5 ± 1.11
(0-2)
40.0 ±23.45
(0-60)
 
Mean ± St.Dev.         CL= Corpora lutea      UF = Unovulated follicles
(- ) § Postinsemination periods                       n= 4/each group                   (  )   Range
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Table 3 : Results distributed according to the   different dosses of LH additives in superovulated buffalo heifers

 
 
Doses of
LH
(U S P Unit)
 
 
Number of New CL/animal
 
Number of
UF/animal
 
Ovulation Rate
(%)
 
Number of Recovered Embryos
 
Embryo
Recovery Rate
 
(%)
 
 
4-8 mm
>8 mm
 
 
 
 
Case 1
Case 2
Case 1
Case 2
Case 1
Case 2
Case 1
Case 2
Case
1
Case 2
Case
1
Case
2
 
00
 
2000
 
4000
 
5000
 
7000
 
10000
 
2
 
2
 
4
 
5
 
2
 
2
 
1
 
2
 
5
 
4
 
4
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
2
 
3
 
3
 
10
 
6
 
6
 
3
 
3
 
3
 
6
 
2
 
2
 
1
 
1
 
1
 
0
 
 
1
 
2
 
0
 
0
 
2
 
1
 
50
 
50
 
80
 
83
 
66
 
100
 
50
 
50
 
100
 
100
 
66
 
80
 
0
 
1
 
3
 
3
 
1
 
0
 
 
0
 
0
 
4
 
2
 
4
 
2
 
0
 
50
 
75
 
60
 
50
 
0
 
 
0
 
0
 
80
 
50
 
100
 
50
 
CL = Corpora lutea                         UF = Unovulated follicle