EVALUATION OF REAL-TIME RT-PCR QUANTITATION OF HCV RNA COMPARED TO OTHER DIAGNOSTIC METHODS

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Dept. of Pathology, Fac. of Vet. Medicine, Assuit University, Director of Molecular Biology Research Unit of Assuit University, Egypt.

2 Dept. of Microbiology, Fac. of Vet. Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV), a single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family, has been identified as a major pathogen of post transfusion and community- transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis. One limitation in HCV research is the lack of a highly sensitive and specific assay to measure viral loads in plasma or serum. HCV circulates in the blood at a low copy number and its genome is extremely heterogeneous. Many investigators used different methods to quantify the viral load in HCV-infected patients. Recently, a real-time RT-PCR analysis has been employed successfully for both basic research and clinical applications. In the present work, 72 patients were studied on referral to the molecular biology research unit of Assuit university, Egypt for HCV quantification by real-time PCR. Initially, all patients were screened by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the presence of anti-HCV antibodies. Six cases (8.3%) were anti-HCV positive and 66 cases (91.7%) were non-reactive for HCV- antibodies in their sera. Real-time RT polymerase chain reaction assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in the sera of all patients was carried out using a pair of primers and Taq-man probe that are specific for recognsion of highly conservative 5 - non coding region (5 - NCR) of HCV genome. The real time RT-PCR assay on the HCV 6 seropositive samples yielded reproducible positive data. Real-time PCR quantification analysis of 66 seronegative patients demonstrated 48 positive cases for HCV genome (72.7%) and 18 cases (27.3%) were negative. The results confirmed the sensitivity and specificity of real-time RT-PCR compared to serodiagnostic ELISA technique. Among the 48 positive cases by real time PCR, 30 cases showed minimal viral load (< 10 IU/ml), 8 cases showed moderate quantity (up to 10 IU/ml) and 10 cases showed strong viral load (>10° IU/ml). Furthermore, the cases with low viral load were selected for qualitative HCV detection by conventional RT-PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. The results showed 4 (13.3%) negative cases and 26 (86.7%) positive cases. These results also reassured the importance of real-time PCR technology for HCV-detection compared to the conventional RT-PCR and highlighted the validity of applying real time PCR for the accurate diagnosis of the viral load, hence monitoring the efficiency of therapeutic drugs in hepatitis patients.

Keywords


Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

Dept. of Pathology, Fac. of Vet. Medicine, Assuit University, Director of Molecular Biology Research Unit of Assuit University, Egypt.

EVALUATION OF REAL-TIME RT-PCR QUANTITATION OF HCV RNA COMPARED TO OTHER DIAGNOSTIC METHODS

(With 3 Tables and 3 Figures)

By M. TAHA and M.W. ABD AL-AZEEM* *Dept. of Microbiology, Fac. of Vet. Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.

(Received at 29/6/2006)

تقييم تفاعل البلمرة المتسلسل ذو الوقت الحقيقي في التقدير الکمي لفيروس الالتهاب الکبدي الوبائي ومقارنته بالوسائل التشخيصية الأخرى

مختار ط ه

،محمد وائل عبد العظيم محمد

يعتبر فيروس الکبد الوبائي آفة رئيسية في حالات نقل الدم و أمراض الالتهاب الکبدي الأخرى، من محددات البحث في مجال فيروس الالتهاب الکبدي الوبائي نقص في الاختبارات المتخصصة والحساسية في قياس کمية الفيروس في بلازما الدم وهذا قد يعزي إلى وجود الفيروس بنسخ قليلة في الدم و إن جينوم الفيروس مختلف المنشأ لدرجة کبيرة. استخدم العديد من الباحثين وسائل مختلفة لتقدير کمية الفيروس في مرض الالتهاب الکبدي الفيروسي وقد أستخدم حديثا اختبار تفاعل البلمرة المتسلسل ذو الوقت الحقيقي للبحث والتطبيقات الإکلينيکية. في هذا البحث تم دراسة ۷۲ مريض تم تحويلهم إلى وحدة البيولوجيا الجزيئية بالجامعة لتقدير الفيروس الکمي بواسطة تفاعل البلمرة المتسلسل ذو الوقت الحقيقي. تم فحص جميع الحالات بصفة مبدئية باستخدام اختبار الأليزا للکشف عن وجود أجسام مضادة للفيروس تمثلت النتائج في وجود 6 (۳, ۸ %) حالات إيجابية و 66 (۷, ۹۱ %) حالة سلبية الوجود الأجسام المضادة في المصل. باستخدام تفاعل البلمرة المتسلسل لتقدير الکمي للفيروس في الست حالات الإيجابية للأجسام المضادة أثبتت وجود الحمض النووي للفيروس. بالنسبة ال 16 حالة السلبية باختيار الإليزا وجد أن

۶۸ (۷, ۷۲ %) حالة تحمل الحمض النووي للفيروس في المصل بکميات عالية ومتوسطة ومنخفضة و ۱۸ (۳, ۲۷ %) حالة سلبية. أکدت هذه النتائج حساسية وتخصص تفاعل البلمرة المتسلسل ذو الوقت الحقيقي في اکتشاف وتقدير فيروس التهاب الکبد الوبائي في مصل الحالات السلبية للأجسام المضادة باستخدام الاليزا. تم اختيار الحالات التي تحمل کمية فيروس منخفضة وعددها ۳۰ حالة الدراسة بواسطة تفاعل البلمرة المتسلسل التقليدي وأوضحت النتائج وجود أربع حالات (۳, ۱۳ %) سلبية بهذا الاختبار بالرغم من وجود الفيروس بکميات منخفضة کما بينت سابقا في تفاعل البلمرة المتسلسل ذوا لوقت الحقيقي. أکدت هذه النتائج أهمية تفاعل البلمرة المتسلسل ذو الوقت الحقيقي في اکتشاف فيروس التهاب الکبد الوبائي بمقارنته بتفاعل البلمرة المتسلسل

203

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

التقليدي ألقت الضوء على صالحة استعماله للتشخيص الدقيق لوجود الفيروس وکميته ومن ثم

على مرضى التهاب الکبدي الوبائي.

متابعة تأثير العقاقير

SUMMARY

Hepatitis C virus (HCV), a single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family, has been identified as a major pathogen of post transfusion and community- transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis. One limitation in HCV research is the lack of a highly sensitive and specific assay to measure viral loads in plasma or serum. HCV circulates in the blood at a low copy number and its genome is extremely heterogeneous. Many investigators used different methods to quantify the viral load in HCV-infected patients. Recently, a real-time RT-PCR analysis has been employed successfully for both basic research and clinical applications. In the present work, 72 patients were studied on referral to the molecular biology research unit of Assuit university, Egypt for HCV quantification by real-time PCR. Initially, all patients were screened by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the presence of anti-HCV antibodies. Six cases (8.3%) were anti-HCV positive and 66 cases (91.7%) were non-reactive for HCV- antibodies in their sera. Real-time RT polymerase chain reaction assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in the sera of all patients was carried out using a pair of primers and Taq-man probe that are specific for recognsion of highly conservative 5 - non coding region (5 - NCR) of HCV genome. The real time RT-PCR assay on the HCV 6 seropositive samples yielded reproducible positive data. Real-time PCR quantification analysis of 66 seronegative patients demonstrated 48 positive cases for HCV genome (72.7%) and 18 cases (27.3%) were negative. The results confirmed the sensitivity and specificity of real-time RT-PCR compared to serodiagnostic ELISA technique. Among the 48 positive cases by real time PCR, 30 cases showed minimal viral load (< 10 IU/ml), 8 cases showed moderate quantity (up to 10 IU/ml) and 10 cases showed strong viral load (>10° IU/ml). Furthermore, the cases with low viral load were selected for qualitative HCV detection by conventional RT-PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. The results showed 4 (13.3%) negative cases and 26 (86.7%) positive cases. These results also reassured the importance of real-time PCR technology for HCV-detection compared to the conventional RT-PCR and highlighted the validity of applying real time PCR for the accurate diagnosis of the viral load, hence monitoring the efficiency of therapeutic drugs in hepatitis patients.

204

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

Key words: Real-time PCR, ELISA, HCV.

INTRODUCTION

Virological diagnosis and monitoring of HCV detection is based on two categories of laboratory tests, namely serologic assays detecting specific antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) and assays that can detect quantity or characterize the components of HCV viral particles such as HCV RNA (Pawlotsky, 2002). Early stages of the infection are missed because the antibodies develop only after one and half months of infection and the test for anti-HCV antibody may be negative in the initial period before the seroconversion phase (Lai, 2001).

HCV RNA detection by polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is highly sensitive and is a reliable test in the early diagnosis of HCV infection (Tanaka et al., 2003). Many investigators used different methods to quantify the viral load in HCV-infected patients (Pawlotsky et al., 1996 and Reichard et al., 1998). However most of these methods can produce conflicting results with considerable differences (Raeymaekers, 1993).

Recently, a real-time RT-PCR analysis has been employed successfully for both basic research and clinical application (Heid et al., 1996 and Tyagi and Kramer, 1996). The real-time PCR method solved these Problems with real-time monitoring of the PCR amplification process and greatly improved the PCR- based quantitation of HCV RNA.

The objective of the present investigation is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of real-time PCR quantitative analysis of HCV- RNA in seronegative as well as seropositive ELISA patients. Moreover, conventional RT-PCR was carried out to assess its validity of detecting cases with week viral load on agarose gel electrophoreses.

MATERIALS and METHODS

Samples

Blood samples were collected from 72 patients referred to the Molecular Biology Research Unit of Assuit University, Egypt, for the routine HCV detection by PCR. The samples were collected in clean sterile test tube, left in room temperature for clotting, and then centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 minutes. Sera were aspirated and stored at -20Co, for ELISA and RNA extraction.

205

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

ELISA

Sera from all patients were screened in duplicates for the presence of anti-HCV antibodies using commercially available ELISA kit (Biokit S.A., Barcelona-Spain). The presence or absence of anti-HCV antibodies in the samples analyzed was determined by relating the absorbance value of each sample to the cut-off value according to the instruction manual. RNA extraction

Total RNA from the collected sera was extracted using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN) following the instruction manual. Viral RNA was stored at -20 C° until used for both qualitative and quantitative analysis. HCV RNA Quantiation by real-time RT-PCR assay

HCV RNA was quantitated in sera of all patients included in the study using HCV protocol by Brilliant QRT-PCR Master kit, 1-Step on Mx 3000P instrument from Stratagene. A known amount of HCV quantification standard RNA was introduced into each specimen as internal positive control beside the no template, negative control to insure accurate viral load quantitation and absence of sample specific PCR inhibitors. Reverse transcription and amplification were carried out using primers that bind within a highly conserved 5'-non translated region of HCV. For detection of amplification products, the assay utilize real-time PCR technology with two different dual-labeled fluorescent oligonucleotide probes, which are able to bind HCV target amplicon and quantification standard amplicon, respectively, within the regions spanned by the primers. The two different probes for the HCV target and the quantification standard are labeled with two different fluorescent reporter dyes. The reporter fluorescence is suppressed in the intact probe by the proximity of the quencher dye due to inductive-resonance-based energy transfer (Förster-type energy transfer). During elongation, the hybridized dual-labeled oligonucleotide probe is cleaved by the 5'-3' exonuclease activity of polymerase, leading to the separation of reporter and quencher dyes. Within each cycle during the annealing and elongation phase of PCR, the increasing emission of fluorescence light from such cleaved dual-labeled oligonucleotides is collected independently for the HCV target and quantification standard at different wavelengths. The larger the original HCV RNA amount of a specimen, the earlier the fluorescence of the reporter dye rises above certain assigned fluorescence levels (the critical-threshold value), whereas for the constant titer of quantification standard RNA, the fluorescence of the

206

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

reporter dye should appear at the same cycle for all specimens. By comparison of critical-threshold values (CT) obtained for the target HCV RNA and the quantification standard RNA, the original HCV RNA concentration (log quantity) of the specimen is calculated. Thermal cycler profile for real-time PCR is described in Table (1). At the end of each PCR run, data was automatically analyzed by the system and the amplification plots were generated.

Table 1: Thermal cycler profile

RT

Incubation

Taq Activation

PCR (45 cycles)

Steps

Hold

Hold

Denaturation

Annealing & Extenation

60 C

Temperature

50C°

95 C°

95 C°

Duration

30:00 min

10:00 min

00:15 min

01:00 min

Qualitative detection of HCV RNA by conventional RT-PCR

This technique was carried out on cases with week viral load quantified by real-time PCR assay using RT-PCR kit from Stratagene that included the following steps according to the instruction manual. Reverse transcription of viral RNA into cDNA

Briefly 28 ul of extracted RNA was mixed with 3ul random primer (Stratagene), 5ul first strand buffer, 1ul RNase block, 2 ul dNTPs (100mM), 1ul MMLV-RT (20 U/ul) and 10ul d.w. The reaction mixture was incubated at 6500 for 5 minutes then cooled slowly at room temperature. The RT thermal cycler profile was 37C for 1 hour, 90C° for 5 minutes then hold at 4Co. Amplification of reverase-transcrptase viral RNA (cDNA)

Five ul of cDNA was used for the first amplification in a reaction volume of 95 ul containing 10 ul 10x buffer, 0.5 ul Taq-polymerase (5 U/ul), 5 ul of each gene- specific primer (10 pmol/ul), that amplify 390 bp of the genome, 0.8 ul dNTPs (100mM) and 73.3 ul d.w. After the first step of amplification consisting of one cycle of 4 minutes at 94 C9, 1 minute at 50 C°, and 2 minutes at 72 C°, we sat up 34 cycles at 94 Co for 1 minute, 50 C° for 1 minute, and 72 C° for 2 minutes. For the second round of amplification 24 cycles of the above conditions were performed. The amplified products were visualized by ethidum bromide staining after electrophoreses on 1.5% agarose gel. Negative and positive controls were included in the PCR reaction.

207

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

RESULTS

ELISA

Screening of sera of all tested samples (72 cases) demonstrated 6 out of 72 cases were anti-HCV antibodies positive (8.3%) where the remaining 66 cases (91.7%) were negative for anti-HCV antibodies (Table: 2).

Table 2: Showing numbers and percentages of serodiagnosis.

ELISA

Reactive

Non-reactive

Total

No.

6

72

66 91.7

%

8.3

100

HCV-RNA quantification by real-time PCR A- ELISA positive cases

The 6 seropositive samples detected by ELISA showed high viral load (>10 IU/ml) by real-time PCR assay. B- ELISA negative cases

Real-time PCR quantification assay of the 66 seronegative cases demonstrated 18 (27.3% negative for viral HCV RNA and 48 cases (72.7%) were positive for HCV RNA Table(3).

Table 3: Correlation between seronegative cases and their respective

real-time PCR results. Non-reactive ELISA

Real-time PCR cases

Positive

Negative No.

No. % No. % 66

72.7

27.3

48

18

According to the obtained CT value of the 48 HCV-RNA positive cases, the data was automatically analyzed via the standard curve that measures the log quantity versus the CT (Figure: 1) and categorized the cases into 30 cases of week viral load (< 10% IU/ml) 8 cases of moderate viral quantity (up to 10 IU/ml) and 10 cases showed high viral load >10° IU/ml) (Figures: 2).

208

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

A An

+ 10,000,000

1,000,000 100.000

10,000 1,000

1

0

2

8

10

4 6 LOG Quantity

0

5

10

15 20 25 30 Cycle Number

35

40 45

Fig. 1: Standard curve

Fig. 2: Amplification plot of representative samples showing variable amount of viral load

Conventional RT-PCR

Upon examination of agarose gels of 30 samples with low viral load (< 10 IU/ml), 4 cases showed no band representing the HCV RNA on the gel while the rest 26 cases showed positive band of 390 bp that represented the amplified PCR products of HCV genome (Figure: 3).

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 9

10

11

12

390 bp

Fig. 3: Ethidium bromide stained agarose gel showing amplified

Fragment of 390bp in some cases. Lane 1-5& 8-10: Positive cases of 390 bp representing the amplified PCR products of HCV genome. Lane 6&7: Negative PCR products for HCV genome. Lane 11: Negative control (No template RNA). Lane 12: Amplified fragments of 390 bp of positive control for HCV genome.

209

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

DISCUSSION

In the present work, employing ELISA technique as a serodiagnostic method for detecting anti-HCV antibodies, revealed positive results in 6 cases out of 72 tested samples. Although ELISA can detect mixture of antibodies directed agnist HCV epitobes, its sensitivity is difficult to be determined (Chevaliez and Pawlotsky, 2006).

In our findings, the high number of sreonegative ELISA patients my be attributed to failure to identify HCV infected cases before seroconvresion the specific antibodies have not yet been produced or are in low titer (Reddy, et al., 2006). Ramalingam et al. (1998) mentioned that with the use of antibody test alone, a proportional of hepatitis C virus infected individuals is missed while testing of RNA additionally increases the sensitivity of detection. The authors added that the highly prevalence of infected individuals without HCV antibody underlines the need for using PCR on such patients. This may either be due to a low antibody response or early infections.

In our work, the seronegative ELISA cases were further assessed by real-time RT-PCR for the presence of viral RNA load in their sera. Sarrazine et al. (2006) mentioned that HCV RNA is the key parameter for management of acute and chronic hepatitis C. Different methods have been developed for commercially available assays for the measurement of HCV RNA in blood samples. Reddy et al. (2006) mentioned that polymerase chain reaction amplify HCV RNA before

10 measurement using specifically labeled primers or DNA probs. However the different techniques have their restrictions, which have lead to diversification of assays suitable, either for sensitive qualitative or quantitative detection of HCV RNA. Real time PCR technology has the potential to overcome these restrictions by linear online detection of HCV RNA from very low to extremely high concentrations.

Our results for viral quantitation by real-time PCR revealed that 18 cases (27.3%) were negative for the presence of viral RNA beside the absence of anti-HCV antibodies in their sera. Acute hepatitis C is very unlikely if both anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA are absent. It is also unlikely if anti-HCV antibodies are present without HCV-RNA. These patients should however be retested after a few weeks because HCV RNA can be temporary undetectable due to transit, partial control of viral replication by the immunoresponse before replication escapes and chronic infection established (Lavillet et al., 2005).

210

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

In our findings we could quantify the viral load in 48 cases that showed no anti-HCV antibodies in their sera by the real-time RT-PCR assay. Thirty cases showed low viral load (<10 IU/ml) and 8 cases with moderate viral load (up to 100 IU/ml) and 10 cases with high viral load (>10° IU/ml). These results proved that HCV-RNA quantitation by real time PCR is specific, sensitive, reproducible and accurate.

Real-time PCR has been described for viral load monitoring in serum and liver samples (Enomoto et al., 2002 and White et al., 2002) as it was shown that this technology could be used as a very reliable and highly sensitive method to quantify the viral load of HCV in serum (Komurain-Pradel et al., 2001).

In our results, we have detected up to 30 IU/ml in one case because the linearity of our standard curve permits us to interpolate values located below the lower limit of the dynamic range (1x10 copies /ml). This degree of sensitivity along with a considerably wide dynamic range allows the use of a single method for the detection of the wide range of loads found with HCV. As far as specificity is concerned, the fluorescence signal due to the cleavage of Taq-man florescence probe is generated only if the target sequence for the probe is amplified by the PCR. Therefore, no signal is generated by non-specific amplification. On other hand, the virtual absence of post-PCR manipulation prevents the carryover of amplification products that were synthesized during previous PCR. Real-time PCR is also reproducible.

Thirty cases with low viral load (<10 IU/ml) were further selected and screened by conventional RT-PCR for the presence of HCV-band on ethidum bromide-stained gels. Surprisingly, 4 cases out of 30 showed no band on gel representing the HCV amplified fragment. Such finding highlighted the restrictions and limitations of the end point detection of HCV by conventional PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. It also, reassured that real-time PCR makes quantitation of DNA and RNA much more precise and reproducible because it relays on threshold cycle (CT) values determined during these exponential phase of PCR rather than the end point detection (Yaung ji-Hong. et al., 2002). Therefore, real-time PCR assay is considered the technique of a ch for highly sensitive quantification of DNA or RNA targets (Germer et al., 2005 and Konnick et al., 2005). In real-time PCR, amplification of a PCR product is detected during each cycling rather than the final amount of PCR products accumulated at the end of PCR cycling. The release of a florescent reporter dye from hybridization probe in each cycle during

211

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

real-time PCR is proportional to the amount of the PCR product (Heid et al., 1996 and Tyagi and Kramer, 1996).

In conclusion, serodiagnostic testing of HCV patients should be considered as a preliminary screening test for detecting anti-HCV antibodies. Real-time QRT-PCR proved high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for quantification of HCV RNA in both seronegative and seropsitive patients. Nevertheless, it has the potential to quantify low copy number of the viral load in sera and should be adopted for monitoring the efficiency of antiviral drugs in both acute and chronic hepatitis patients. Also conventional RT-PCR is routinely used for qualitative HCV detection, caution should be undertaken in evaluating the negative cases of HCV RNA.

REFERENCES

Chevaliez, S. and Pawlotsky, J.M. (2006): Hepatitis C virus serologic

and virologic tests and clinical diagnosis of HCV-related liver

disease. Int. J. Med. Sci. 3(2): 35-40. Enomoto, M.; Nishiguchi, S., Shiomi, S.; Tanaka, M.; Yokogawa, T.;

Fukuda, K.; Ueda, T.; Tamori, A.; Habu, D.; Takeda, T., Yano, Y. and Otani, S. (2002): Changes in serum levels of hepatitis C virus genotype 1b monitored by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction as a predictor of long term response to interferon-alpha treatment. AM. J. Gastroenterol.97 (2), 420

426. Germer, J.J.; Harmsen, W. S.; Mandrekar, J.N.; Mitchell, P.S. and Yao,

J.D. (2005): Evaluation of the COBAS TaqMan HCV test with automated sample processing using the MagNA pure LC

instrument. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 293-298. Heid, C.A.; Stevens, J.; Livak, K.J. and Williams, P.M. (1996): Real

time quantitative PCR.Genome RES. 6, 986-994. Komurian-Pradel, F.; Paranhos-Baccala, G.; Sodoyer, M.; Chevallier,

P.; Mandrand, B.; Lotteau, V. and Andre, P. (2001): Quantitation of HCV RNA using real-time PCR and

fluorimetry. J. Virol Methods, 95(1-2), 111-119. Konnick, E.Q.; Williams, S.M.; Ashwood, E.R. and Hillyard, D.R.

(2005): Evaluation of the COBAS hepatitis C virus (HCV) TqaMan analyte-specific reagent assay and comparison to the COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor V2.0 and Versant HCV bDNA 3.0 assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2133-2140.

212

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

Lai, K.N. (2001): Hepatitis C infection screening in hemodialysis units.

AM. J. Kidney Dis. 38:186-188. Lavillette, D.; Morice, Y.; Germanidis, G.; Donot, P.; Soulier, A.;

Pagkalos, E.; Sakellariou, G.; Intrator, L.; Bartosch, B.; Pawlotsky, J.M. and Cosset, F.L. (2005): Human serum facilitates hepatitis C virus infection, and neutralizing responses inversely correlate with viral replication kinetics at the acute phase of hepatitis C virus infection. J. Virol. 79(10):

6023-34. Martell, M.; Gomez, J.; Esteban, J.I., Sauleda, S.; Quer, J.; Cabot, B.

Esteban, R. and Guardia, J. (1999): High-throughpout real-time reverse transcription-PCR quantitation of hepatitis C virus

RNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:327-332. Pawlotsky, J.M. (2002): Use and interpretation of virological tests for

hepatitis C. Hepatology 36:565-73. Pawlotsky, J.M.; Roudot-Thoraval, F.; Bastie, A.; Darthuy, F.; Remire,

J.; Metreau, J.M., Zafrani, E.S., Duval, J. and Dhumeaux, D. (1996): Factors affecting responses to interferon-alpha in

chronic hepatitis C. J. Infect. Dis. 174, 1-7. Raeymaekers, L. (1993): Quantitative PCR: theoretical considerations

with practical implications. Anal. Biochem. 214, 582-585. Ramalingam, S.; George Babu, P.; Chandy G.; Kurien G.; Tomas P.;

and Sridharan G. (1998): Importance of RT-PCR for detection of hepatitis C virus among different patient groups. Indian J.

Med. Research. Reddy, A.K.; Dakshinamurty, K.V. and Lakshmi, V. (2006): Utility of

HCV core antigen ELISA in the screening for hepatitis C virus infection in patients on hemodialysis. Indian J. Med. Microbiol

24(1): 55-57. Reichard, O.; Norkrans, G.; Fryden, A.; Bracnier, J.H.; Sonnerborg, A.

and Weiland, O. (1998): Randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of interferon alph-2b with and without ribavirin

for chronic hepatitis C. Lancet 351, 83-87. Sarrazin, C.: Gärtner, B.: Sizmann, D.; Babiel, R.: Mihm, U.; Hofmann,

W.P.; Wagner, M. and Zeuzem, S. (2006): Comparison of conventional PCR with Real-Time PCR and branched DNA Based Assays for Hepatitis C Virus RNA Quantification and Clinical Significance for Genotypes 1 to 5. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44(3): 729-737.

213

Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006

Tanaka, Y.; Takagi, K. Fujihara, T.; Kitsugi, K. and Fujiwara,

Hiramatsu, K. (2003): High stability of enzyme immuno assay for hepatitis C core antigen-evaluation before and after

incubation in room temperature. Hepatol Res. 26: 261-267. Tyagi, S. and Kramer, F.R. (1996): Molecular beacons: probes that

fluoresce upon hybridization. Nat. Biotechnol. 14,303-308. White, P.A.; Pan, Y., Freeman, A.J.; Marions, G.; Ffrench, R.A.; Lioyd,

A.R. and Rawlinson, W.D. (2002): Quantification of hepatitis C virus in human liver and serum samples by using lightCycler reveres transcriptase PCR. J. Clin. Microbio. 40 (11), 4346

4348. Young, J.-H.; Lai, J.-P. Douglas, S.D.; Metzger, D.; Zhu, X.-H. and Ho,

W.-Z. (2002): Real-time RT-PCR for quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA. J. Virological Methods 102: 119-128.

214

REFERENCES
Chevaliez, S. and Pawlotsky, J.M. (2006): Hepatitis C virus serologic
and virologic tests and clinical diagnosis of HCV-related liver
disease. Int. J. Med. Sci. 3(2): 35-40. Enomoto, M.; Nishiguchi, S., Shiomi, S.; Tanaka, M.; Yokogawa, T.;
Fukuda, K.; Ueda, T.; Tamori, A.; Habu, D.; Takeda, T., Yano, Y. and Otani, S. (2002): Changes in serum levels of hepatitis C virus genotype 1b monitored by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction as a predictor of long term response to interferon-alpha treatment. AM. J. Gastroenterol.97 (2), 420
426. Germer, J.J.; Harmsen, W. S.; Mandrekar, J.N.; Mitchell, P.S. and Yao,
J.D. (2005): Evaluation of the COBAS TaqMan HCV test with automated sample processing using the MagNA pure LC
instrument. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 293-298. Heid, C.A.; Stevens, J.; Livak, K.J. and Williams, P.M. (1996): Real
time quantitative PCR.Genome RES. 6, 986-994. Komurian-Pradel, F.; Paranhos-Baccala, G.; Sodoyer, M.; Chevallier,
P.; Mandrand, B.; Lotteau, V. and Andre, P. (2001): Quantitation of HCV RNA using real-time PCR and
fluorimetry. J. Virol Methods, 95(1-2), 111-119. Konnick, E.Q.; Williams, S.M.; Ashwood, E.R. and Hillyard, D.R.
(2005): Evaluation of the COBAS hepatitis C virus (HCV) TqaMan analyte-specific reagent assay and comparison to the COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor V2.0 and Versant HCV bDNA 3.0 assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2133-2140.
212
Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006
Lai, K.N. (2001): Hepatitis C infection screening in hemodialysis units.
AM. J. Kidney Dis. 38:186-188. Lavillette, D.; Morice, Y.; Germanidis, G.; Donot, P.; Soulier, A.;
Pagkalos, E.; Sakellariou, G.; Intrator, L.; Bartosch, B.; Pawlotsky, J.M. and Cosset, F.L. (2005): Human serum facilitates hepatitis C virus infection, and neutralizing responses inversely correlate with viral replication kinetics at the acute phase of hepatitis C virus infection. J. Virol. 79(10):
6023-34. Martell, M.; Gomez, J.; Esteban, J.I., Sauleda, S.; Quer, J.; Cabot, B.
Esteban, R. and Guardia, J. (1999): High-throughpout real-time reverse transcription-PCR quantitation of hepatitis C virus
RNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:327-332. Pawlotsky, J.M. (2002): Use and interpretation of virological tests for
hepatitis C. Hepatology 36:565-73. Pawlotsky, J.M.; Roudot-Thoraval, F.; Bastie, A.; Darthuy, F.; Remire,
J.; Metreau, J.M., Zafrani, E.S., Duval, J. and Dhumeaux, D. (1996): Factors affecting responses to interferon-alpha in
chronic hepatitis C. J. Infect. Dis. 174, 1-7. Raeymaekers, L. (1993): Quantitative PCR: theoretical considerations
with practical implications. Anal. Biochem. 214, 582-585. Ramalingam, S.; George Babu, P.; Chandy G.; Kurien G.; Tomas P.;
and Sridharan G. (1998): Importance of RT-PCR for detection of hepatitis C virus among different patient groups. Indian J.
Med. Research. Reddy, A.K.; Dakshinamurty, K.V. and Lakshmi, V. (2006): Utility of
HCV core antigen ELISA in the screening for hepatitis C virus infection in patients on hemodialysis. Indian J. Med. Microbiol
24(1): 55-57. Reichard, O.; Norkrans, G.; Fryden, A.; Bracnier, J.H.; Sonnerborg, A.
and Weiland, O. (1998): Randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of interferon alph-2b with and without ribavirin
for chronic hepatitis C. Lancet 351, 83-87. Sarrazin, C.: Gärtner, B.: Sizmann, D.; Babiel, R.: Mihm, U.; Hofmann,
W.P.; Wagner, M. and Zeuzem, S. (2006): Comparison of conventional PCR with Real-Time PCR and branched DNA Based Assays for Hepatitis C Virus RNA Quantification and Clinical Significance for Genotypes 1 to 5. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44(3): 729-737.
213
Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 52 No. 110 July 2006
Tanaka, Y.; Takagi, K. Fujihara, T.; Kitsugi, K. and Fujiwara,
Hiramatsu, K. (2003): High stability of enzyme immuno assay for hepatitis C core antigen-evaluation before and after
incubation in room temperature. Hepatol Res. 26: 261-267. Tyagi, S. and Kramer, F.R. (1996): Molecular beacons: probes that
fluoresce upon hybridization. Nat. Biotechnol. 14,303-308. White, P.A.; Pan, Y., Freeman, A.J.; Marions, G.; Ffrench, R.A.; Lioyd,
A.R. and Rawlinson, W.D. (2002): Quantification of hepatitis C virus in human liver and serum samples by using lightCycler reveres transcriptase PCR. J. Clin. Microbio. 40 (11), 4346
4348. Young, J.-H.; Lai, J.-P. Douglas, S.D.; Metzger, D.; Zhu, X.-H. and Ho,
W.-Z. (2002): Real-time RT-PCR for quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA. J. Virological Methods 102: 119-128.