Document Type : Research article
Authors
1 Department of Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories Ministry of Agriculture, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 National Agricultural Research and Animal Resources Center Ministry of Agriculture, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Keywords
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories
Ministry of Agriculture, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
IMMUNOGENICITY OF CAMELPOX VIRUS,
Jouf -78 vaccine - Strain in Boskat rabbits
and Guinea pigs
(With 2 Tables)
By
M.H. Abdel Baky; A. Al-Sukayran*;
K.S. Mazloum*; A.M. Al-Bokmy*
and D.M. Al-Mujalli
*National Agricultural Research and Animal Resources Center
Ministry of Agriculture, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
(Received at 18/12/2005)
منصور هاشم عبد الباقي ، عبد الله محمد الصقيران ، کمال صابر مظلوم ،
أحمد منصور البقمي ، ودخيل محمد المجلي
لقد وُجهت الدراسة إلى اختبار کفاءة استخدام حيوانات التجارب المعملية (الأرانب والوبر) في تقييم کفاءة لقاح جدري الإبل المستضعف المحضر بتمرير عترة الجوف 78 في المزارع النسيجية وفي تحضير الأمصال المناعية وحيدة النوعية لقد أثبتت النتائج أن الأرانب دون الوبر قد تفاعلت مناعياً وبکفاءة للقاح المحقون بها وأن تحضير الأمصال المناعية المضادة لفيروس جدري الإبل قد نجحت في کل من الأرانب والوبر على السواء.
Attention was directed to the lack of small laboratory animals (Rabbits and Guinea Pigs) to replace the camels in evaluating the immunogencity of the attenuated tissue culture vaccine of camlepox virus, Jouf-78 strain, and in preparation of monospecific antiserum against camelpox virus. The obtained results proved that rabbits reacted immunologically to the inoculated vaccine, and monospecific antiserum against camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain was successfully prepared in rabbits and guinea pigs.
Key words: Vaccination, camelpox virus, rabbits, guinea pigs
Introduction
Camelpox is an enzootic contagious viral disease that devastate camels in many countries in Asia and Africa (Borisovich, 1973; Al-Hendi et al., 1994; Gitao 1997 and Warnery et al., 1997). Protection and immunization of camels against camelpox by using live attenated virus vaccine developed from a local isolate (Jouf-78 strain) had been carried out and recommended by Hafez et al. (1992). It is difficult and expensive to obtain adequate numbers of susceptible camels for vaccine potency evaluation, and as a result, small laboratory animal model for camelpox virus vaccine potency test virtually disappeared from the research field of this disease. This study was directed to determine the suitability of Boskat rabbits and guinea pigs as an inexpensive laboratory animals of uniform susceptibility in assaying the potency of tissue culture live attended vaccine of camelpox virus, Jouf 78 strain, and preparation of standard monospecfic anti, camelpox virus serum.
MATERIALS and METHODS
Reference Virus:
Camelpox virus, Jouf-78 Strain, isolated from clinical cases of the disease in Al-Jouf, north region of Saudi Arabia, attenuated throughout serial passages in primary cell culture of the kidney of camel by the National Agricultural Research & Animal Resources Center (NARARC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and reviewed by the Institute of Tropical Veterinary Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Munich, Germany was used for preparation of the live attenuated vaccine of camelpox virus (Hafez et al., 1992). Stock vials of the vaccine batch No.1 produced by NARARC in 1995 and kept at –20C0 was determined to be efficient by titration in vero cell cultures.
Cell Culture:
Cultures of Vero cell line obtained from Veterinary vaccines Production Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia was maintained and grown in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) supplemented with 2-10% fetal bovine serum plus 100 IU penicillin sodium and 100 µg streptomycin sulphate / ml medium.
Animals:
Groups of adult females and males boskat rabbit weighed 2.5 – 3 kg and Guinea Pigs weighed 300 – 350 gm were obtained from King Faisal Specialist Hospital colonies, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Animals groups were kept in special cages .
Preparation of Immunizing Virus Antigens:
One vial of the camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain vaccine was reconstituted with 1 ml of sterile distilled water and inoculated on confluent sheet of vero cells monolayer cultures, when the cytopathic effect (CPE) was 90 – 100%, the infected cultures fluid was freezed at -20C0 and thawed, then clarified by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 30 minutes at 100C. The clarified supernatant fluid was kept at 40C, and it was titrated in vero cell cultures. The virus was thereafter precipitated by addition and stirring of 0.4 gm ammonium sulphate per ml of virus fluid at 40C for 4 hours (Cann, 2000). The precipitate was collected after centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 1 hour at 100C, and it was reconstituted in 1/20 of its original volume with sterile distilled water then stored at –700C. The viability of the concentrated virus was checked by conducting the infectivity test on vero cell cultures.
Virus Infectivity Assay
Virus infectivity was assayed by end point in microititre plate cultures of vero cells, using serial ten fold dilutions (four wells per dilution). Titres were calculated by the method of Reed and Muench (1938) and expressed as Log10 TCID50 / ml.
Serum Neutralization Test (SNT):
SNT was conducted in guidence of Hafez et al. (1992) to determine the titre of camelpox virus – neutralizing antibodies in sera of rabbits and guinea pigs which had inoculated with camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain vaccine. The test was performed in a microtitre system using monolayer cultures of vero cell, serial double fold dilutions (1/2 – 1/256) of serum samples against 10 and 50 TCID50 of clarified virus fluid. The titre was expressed as a reciprocal of the highest dilution of serum that completely almost inhibit CPE in 50% of the inoculated wells.
Experimental Design:
Expriment (1)
Experiment No. 1 was designed to study the susceptibility of Boskat rabbit and guinea pigs to the immunization with a variable doses of camelpox Virus, Jouf-78 Strain Vaccine as follows:
Animal Group |
Inoculum Titre |
Route of Inoculation |
Times of Inoculation |
Time of Bleeding |
Rabbits 1
Rabbits 2
Rabbits 3 |
5 Log10 TCID50
3 Log10 TCID50
5 Log10 TCID50 |
I/M in thigh
|
Two injections with 10 days interval
Two injections with 10 days interval One injection |
11 days apart the last injection
11 days apart the last injection
21 days post inoculation |
G.pigs 1
G.pigs 2
G.pigs 3 |
5 Log10 TCID50
3 Log10 TCID50
5 Log10 TCID50 |
S/C in axillae |
Two injections with 10 days interval
Two injections with 10 days interval
One injection |
11 days apart the last injection
11 days apart the last injection
21 days post inoculation |
Experiment 2.
This experiment was conducted to prepare standard monospecific serum against camelpox virus. One group of each rabbits (3 animals) and guinea Pigs (5 animals) was inoculated with initial and booster doses of camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain vaccine of approximate titre 7 Log10 TCD50/ Dose with 10 days interval time between the two injections, then animals once bled 11 days apart from the last injection. Another group of each rabbits and guinea pigs was intramuscularly inoculated with initial dose of 1 ml. immunizing antigen of camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain (equivalent to 2 x 108 TCID50) emulsified with 1ml of Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA), MP, Biomedical, Inc. Lot No. 2231H, followed by booster dose of 1 ml. immunizing antigen emulsified with 1 ml of Freund’s incomplete adjuvant (FIA), ICN, biomedical Inc. Lot no. 03667, 28 days later on intitial dose and 14 days before the bleeding time. In experiment 1 and 2, animals were bled by heart puncture, and serum samples were collected and inactivated by heating at 560 in water bath for 30 minutes then stored at –20C0.
The results of indirect potency test of the attenuated camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain vaccine in Boskat rabbit and guinea pigs are summarized in Table (1). The record range and mean values of 10 TCID50 Camelpox virus-neutralizing antibody titres were 128-256 (192) & 4-24 (13.2), 32-48 (37.33) & 2-12 (4.4), and 16-64 (42.67) & 2-16 (8.0) respectively in sera of rabbits & guinea pigs of group (1) that was inoculated with an initial and booster doses of the vaccine of titre 5 Log10 TCID50 with 10 days interval time, group (2) inoculated with initial and booster doses of the vaccine of titre 3 Log10 TCID50 with 10 days interval time, and group (3) inoculated with a single dose of the vaccine of titre 5Log10 TCID50. Also, 50 TCID50 camelpox virus-neutralizing antibody titres of mean values 24, 2 and 2.67 were only detected respectively in groups 1, 2 and 3 of immunized rabbits.
The results of standard monospecific antiserum preparation against camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain in Boskat rabbits and guinea pigs are shown in Table (2) 50 TCID50 camelpox virus neutralizing antibody titres of 96 & 32 and 192 & 128 were recorded respectively in pooled sera of rabbits & guinea pigs of group (1) inoculated with initial and booster doses of the vaccine of titre 7 Log10 TCID50 with 10 days interval time and group (2) inoculated with initial dose of the concentrated camelpox virus antigen emulsified in Freund’s complete adjuvant and booster dose of the antigen emulsified in Freund’s incomplete adjuvant with 28 days interval time.
Table 1: Camelpox Virus – neutralizing antibodies in sera of Boskat Rabbit and Guinea Pigs inoculated with variable doses of live attenuated vaccine of Camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain.
Animal No. |
56 Rabbits Group No. |
Animal No. |
78 Guinea pigs Group No. |
||||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
||||||
|
SNT1 |
SNT2 |
SNT1 |
SNT2 |
SNT1 |
SNT2 |
|
SNT1 |
SNT2 |
SNT1 |
SNT2 |
SNT2 |
SNT2 |
1 |
256* |
32 |
48 |
2 |
64 |
4 |
1 |
24 |
- |
12 |
- |
16 |
- |
2 |
192 |
16 |
32 |
2 |
48 |
4 |
2 |
16 |
- |
6 |
- |
12 |
- |
3 |
128 |
8 |
32 |
2 |
16 |
- |
3 |
16 |
- |
2 |
- |
6 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
6 |
- |
2 |
- |
4 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
Mean |
192 |
24.o |
37.33 |
2.0 |
42.67 |
2.67 |
Mean |
13.2 |
- |
4.4 |
- |
8.0 |
- |
SNT 1 = Serum Neutrlization Test (using 10 TCID50 of virus)
SNT 2 = Serum Neutrlization Test (using 50 TCID50 of virus)
* titre: Reciprocal of serum dilution.
Group 1 of rabbits and G.pigs received two injections of the virus titre (5 log10 TCID50) with 10 days interval time.
Group 2 of rabbits and G.pigs received two injections of (3 log10 TCID50)with 10 days interval time.
Group 3 of rabbits and G.pigs received one injection of the virus titre (5 log10 TCID50).
Table 2: Camelpox Virus – neutralizing anitbody titres in sera of Boskat rabbits and guinea pigs inoculated with Camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain vaccine.
Animal / Group |
Neutralizing Antibody Titre Against 50 TCID 50 of Camelpox Virus |
Boskat rabbit 1 |
96* |
Boskat rabbit 2 |
192 |
Guinea pigs 1 |
32 |
Guinea pigs 2 |
128 |
* = Rciprocal of serum dilution
Group (1) of rabbits and G.pigs was inoculated with two injections of virus titre 7 log10 TCD50 with 10 days interval time.
Group (2) of rabbits and G.pigs was inoculated with initial dose of camelpox virus antigen emulsified in FCA and booster dose of the antigen in FIA with 28 days interval time.
Currently, ehallenge test of the vaccinated animals with wild –type strain is considered the optimum method for evaluation the degree of protective and immunogenic capacities that induced by the applied vaccine. However indirect evidence of potency for evaluation of vaccine by determining the development of antibodies in the target animals has a benificial value. From a practical point of view, in the present work, Boskat rabbits and guinea pigs were used as a model for conducting the indirect potency of live attenuated camelpox virus vaccine (Jouf 78) and for preparation of a monospecific antiserum against camelpox virus. It has been reported that an Egyptian strain (Fayoum-71) of camelpox virus produces erythematous lesions in rabbits 3-4 days post intradermal inoculation and the virus can be isolated and serially transferred through rabbits without difficulty (Tantawi, 1974). This may candidly refers to the susceptibility of rabbits to camelpox virus infection. The obtained results, cleared that Boskat rabbits were reacted immunologically to primary and booster doses of the vaccine of titre 3 Log10 TCID50 / dose with 10 days interval time. The inoculated animals showed a satisfactory level of humoral immune. On the other hand, the immunological reaction of guinea pigs that response received the same pattern and bleeding were unsatisfactory. The pattern of dosage and bleeding that choiced in the application of this experiment was dependent upon two considerations, (1) its reliability to safe time, (2) the lack of sharp determination of the required minimal immunizing dose titre for tissue culture live attenuated vaccine of camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain, but the common virus titre of 7 Log10 TCID50 / vial yield in all batches of the vaccine with stability and safety do greatly suggest a titre of at least 3 Log10 TCID50 as recommended field dose (Hafez et al, 1992).
In comparision, serum sampls collected from camels 4 weeks post inoculation with a variable titres (1, 2 and 7 Log10 TCID50/dose) of tissue culture live attenuated vaccine of camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain showed camelpox virus neutralizing antibody titres range of 16-32 (Hafez et al, 1992).
In view of the relativity in which antibody formation in sera of rabbits and guinea pigs responded accordingly to the increase of the inoculated virus titre, it is clear that inoculation of initial and booster doses of the vaccine titre 7 Log10 TCID50 / dose was capable to induce formation of a significant neutralizing antibody titres in both of rabbits and guinea pigs. However, a comparatively higher neutralizing antibodies was obtained in sera rabbits and guinea pigs which initiated with camelpox virus antigen emulsified in Freund’s complete adjuvant, boostered with the antigen emulsified in Freund’s incomplete adjuvant with 28 days interval time and bled 14 days later on.
In conclusion, it is evident from the present study that Boskat rabbit can be used as a small laboratory animal model for assessment of the immunogenic capacity of tissue culture live attenuated vaccine of camelpox virus, Jouf-78 strain, and preparation of camelpox virus monospecific antisera can conducted in Boskat rabbits and guinea pigs.
Al-Hendi, A.B.; Abuelzein, E.M.E.; Gameel, A.A. and Hassanien, M.M. (1994): A slow spreading mild form of camelpox infection. J. Vet. Med. B.41, 1: 71-73.
Borisovich, Y.F. (1973): Little-known infectious diseases in animals. Kobs, Moscow: 32-42
Cann, A.J. (2000): RNA virus, A practical approach. Published by Oxford University Press.
Gitao, C.G. (1997): An investigation of camelpox outbreak in two principal Camel (Camelus dromedarius) rearing areas of Kenya. Rev. Sci. Tech. Office Int. des Epiz 16 (3): 841-847.
Hafez S.M.; Al-Sukayran, A.; dela Cruz, D.; Mazloum, K.S.; Al-Bokmy, A.M.; Al-Mukayel, A. and Amjad A.M. (1992): Developmet of live cell culture camlepox vaccine. Vaccine, 10 (8): 533-538.
Reed, L.J. and Muench, H. (1938): A simple method of estimating fifty percent end point American Journal of Hygience, 27: 493-497.
Tantawi, H.H. (1974): Comparative studies on camelpox, sheep pox and vaccinia virus. Acta Virologica, 18, 347.
Wernery, U.; Kaaden, O.R. and AU. Ali M. (1997): Orthopox virus infections in dromedary camels in united Arab Emirates during winter season. Journal of Camel practice and research, 4 (1) : 51-53.