GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF RAHMANI LAMBS FED DIFFERENT DIETARY PROTEIN LEVELS

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Dept. of Animal and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Vet. Med., Assiut University

2 Dept. of Animal and Poultry production. Fac. of Agric., Assiut Univ.

Abstract

Fifteen male Rahmani lambs (8 months in age with an average body weight 30.52 ± 0.21 Kg) were used in this study to evaluate the effect of different protein levels in diets on the performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, ruminal characteristics and carcass traits in addition to economical benefit. Animals were randomly divided into 3 similar groups (5 lambs each). Each group was fed on one of the protein level tested (12, 14.70 & 17% CP) for 90 days. The medium protein's ration (14.7 %) was considered as control. The two different protein levels as treatments (high protein, HP = 17%, low protein, LP= 12%). All diets contained the same digestible energy (3.20 MCal/kg DE / kg diet). There was significant (P<0.05) difference in the feed intake, weight gain and feed conversion between different experimental groups. The apparent digestion coefficients of DM, CP, EE, CF & NFE were significantly (P<0.05) increased with increasing dietary protein levels. There was significant (P<0.05) increase in the total protein, albumin, globulin and urea as the protein level increased. The levels of protein had no significant effect on the pH of the rumen, while ammonia-N concentration and total volatile fatty acids were significantly (P<0.05) increased. There were no significant differences in the carcass characteristics between treated groups. Consequently, it was considered that feeding Rahmani lambs with higher protein level than 14.7% had no advantage for performance and would be cause of economic loss, it can be said that, 14.7% CP was optimal.
 

Keywords


Dept. of Animal and Clinical Nutrition,

Faculty of Vet. Med., Assiut University.

 

Growth performance and carcass characteristics of Rahmani lambs fed different dietary protein levels

(With 7 Table)

 

By

A.N. Sayed and M.N.M. Abd El-Ati*

* Dept. of Animal and Poultry production. Fac. of Agric., Assiut Univ.

(Received at 16/4/2009)

 

معدل الأداء وصفات الذبيحة في حملان الرحماني المغذاة علي مستويات مختلفة من البروتين

 

عبدالباسط نصر سيد ، محمد نصرت عبدالعاطي

 

تم استخدام عدد 15 من حملان الرحماني في هذه التجربة لدراسة تأثير مستويات مختلفة من البروتين في العلائق علي الأداء ومعاملات هضم المواد الغذائية وقياسات الدم وصفات سائل الکرش وصفات الذبيحة. قسمت الحيوانات عشوائيا الي ثلاثة مجموعات ( 5 حملان / مجموعة). غذيت کل مجموعة علي نسبة من البروتين المختبر (12 , 14.7 , 17%). کانت نسبة البروتين المرتفعة 17% والمنخفضة 14% و 14.7 % للمقارنة. احتوت کل العلائق علي طاقة هضم واحدة (3.2 ميجاکالوري/کجم عليقة). وقد خلصت نتائج التجربة إلي مايلي: وجود اختلافات معنوية بين المجموعات في معدلات کل من استهلاک الأکل والزيادة في وزن الجسم والتحويل الغذائي. زيادة معنوية في معاملات هضم المادة الجافة والبروتين الخام والدهون والألياف ومستخلص خالي النتروجين مع زيادة نسبة البروتين في العلائق. وجود زيادة في البروتين الکلي والالبيومين والجلوبيولين واليوريا في سيرم الدم مع زيادة نسبة البروتين. عدم تأثر الأس الهيدروجينى لسائل الکرش مع وجود زيادة معنوية في ترکيز الامونيا والأحماض الدهنية الطيارة في الکرش مع زيادة نسبة البروتين. عدم وجود أي اختلافات معنوية في صفات الذبيحة بين المجموعات المختبرة. نستخلص من هذه التجربة أن زيادة نسبة البروتين في علائق حملان الرحماني عن 14.7 % ليس له أي تأثير علي معدل الأداء وتعتبر النسبة المثلي من البروتين لهذه الحملان.

 

SUMMARY

 

Fifteen male Rahmani lambs (8 months in age with an average body weight 30.52 ± 0.21 Kg) were used in this study to evaluate the effect of different protein levels in diets on the performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, ruminal characteristics and carcass traits in addition to economical benefit. Animals were randomly divided into 3 similar groups (5 lambs each). Each group was fed on one of the protein level tested (12, 14.70 & 17% CP) for 90 days. The medium protein's ration (14.7 %) was considered as control. The two different protein levels as treatments (high protein, HP = 17%, low protein, LP= 12%). All diets contained the same digestible energy (3.20 MCal/kg DE / kg diet). There was significant (P<0.05) difference in the feed intake, weight gain and feed conversion between different experimental groups. The apparent digestion coefficients of DM, CP, EE, CF & NFE were significantly (P<0.05) increased with increasing dietary protein levels. There was significant (P<0.05) increase in the total protein, albumin, globulin and urea as the protein level increased. The levels of protein had no significant effect on the pH of the rumen, while ammonia-N concentration and total volatile fatty acids were significantly (P<0.05) increased. There were no significant differences in the carcass characteristics between treated groups. Consequently, it was considered that feeding Rahmani lambs with higher protein level than 14.7% had no advantage for performance and would be cause of economic loss, it can be said that, 14.7% CP was optimal.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

            Sheep are important meat producing animals in many areas of the tropic and subtropic regions. Through intensive management, the performance of sheep is improved; with higher growth rates and more desirable carcass composition as compared to those raised under traditional systems (Abou'l Ella et al., 2005). It is well known that the most important factor causing lack of yield and the restriction in lamb meat production is insufficient nutrition. Inadequate protein intake results in lower ammonia in the rumen, thus growth of ruminal bacteria is influenced negatively. Consequently, it resulted in lower feed intake, digestibility and performance. However, the excessive protein intake caused increased feed cost and economical losses. The determination of optimum levels of dietary protein levels are also important in order to prevent environmental pollution due to emission of ammonia into the atmosphere from degradation of excreted urea, to avoid unnecessary losses of nitrogen and minimize costs of feed (Negesse et al., 2001). Protein requirements suggested by A. R. C. (1980) are smaller than those published by NRC (1985), indicating that additional investigations are necessary on lamb protein requirements, particularly for animals during periods of accelerated growth. Many studies were carried out to determine the optimum dietary crude protein level for lamb. The NRC (1985) recommended 14.5% CP for weaned lambs for maximum growth, but Andrews and Orskov (1970) reported the maximum weight gain occurred at 17% dietary CP. Although feeding lambs with 18% CP diets is common practice, it was reported that lambs fed 16 and 18 % CP diet had higher body gain and dry matter intake than lambs fed 10, 12 and 14% CP diet, and there were no differences between lambs fed 16 and 18% CP (Titi et al., 2000). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different protein levels in diets on the performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, ruminal characteristics and carcass traits of Rahmani lambs.

 

MATERIALS and METHODS

 

Animals:

            Fifteen male Rahmani lambs (8 months in age with an average body weight 30.52±0.21 Kg) were randomly divided into 3 similar groups (5 lambs each). Each group was fed on one of the tested protein level (12.0, 14.7 & 17.0 % CP) for 90 days. The diets were given twice daily at 9.00 am and 4.00 pm and any residues were collected and weighed throughout the experimental period and all animals had free access to clean water. Animals were weighed at the beginning and each week interval till the end of the experiment to calculate gain and feed intake.

 

Diets:

            The diets were formulated and composed of concentrate mixture and wheat straw as roughage. Each animal was offered it's quota of concentrate and roughage mixed together. The medium protein's ration (MP) was formulated to contain the recommended levels of digestible energy (DE) 3.20 Mcal/kg, crude protein (CP) 14.7 % according to the NRC (1981) for sheep. The two different protein levels as treatments (high protein, HP = 17%, low protein, LP= 12%). All diets contained 3.20 MCal/kg DE/ kg diet (Table, 1).

 

 

 

 

Table 1: Ingredients and chemical analysis (%) of the experimental rations.

 

Items

Treatment

LP

MP

HP

Ingredients:

White corn

Soybean meal

Dried fat

Wheat straw

Limestone, ground

Common salt

Premix

Total

Chemical analysis:

DM

CP

EE

CF

NFE

Ash

Calcium

Phosphorus

DE (kcal/kg diet)

 

56.53

10.00

5.00

27.00

0.67

0.50

0.30

100

 

88.93

11.98

6.14

13.57

61.11

7.20

0.51

0.30

3.21

 

46.00

17.30

5.00

30.30

0.60

0.50

0.30

100

 

88.97

14.69

6.04

15.21

56.25

7.81

0.50

0.31

3.20

 

42.80

22.83

5.00

28.00

0.57

0.50

0.30

100

 

88.23

16.94

6.02

14.54

54.76

7.74

0.51

0.34

3.20

 

Digestibility trials:

            A digestion trial was conducted for 7 days at the end of the experiment to assess the utilization of different dietary nutrients. During this period, animals were fed a fixed weight of ration. Representative feed and fecal samples collected over the period of 7 days were subjected to chemical analysis according to A. O. A. C. (1990). Digestion coefficients of the nutrients for the different experimental diets were calculated by using the direct method.

Blood sample:

            Blood samples were taken from all the animals from jugular vein before feeding at the last day of collection period in a dry, clean and sterile centrifuge tubes. Total serum protein, albumin and globulin were determined using standard kits supplied by Bio-Merieux (Baines/france).

            At the end of the experiment, rumen liquor was collected by stomach tube from each animal just before feeding in clean and sterile flask, then aliquots from the filtrate was used to determine total volatile fatty acids (VFAS) and ammonia concentrations. As soon as the rumen fluid samples were obtained, pH was immediately measured by pH meter. Total volatile fatty acids and ammonia concentrations were determined by gas-liquid chromatography (Intersmat, IGC 120 FB).

Carcass traits:

            At the end of the experiment, 3 animals were selected from each of the treatments and starved for 16 h, while water was available. Live weights at slaughter, dressed carcass, edible organs and body fat weight were recorded.

Economical efficiency:

            Economical efficiency was calculated as the ratio between income (price of weight gain) and the cost of feed consumed.

Statistical analysis:

            All data were subjected to statistical analysis (SAS, 1990). Duncan's (1955) multiple range test was utilized to detect differences among groups.  

                         

RESULTS

 

            The performance of lambs fed on the different experimental diets is presented in Table (2). The diet have high protein gave the similar body weight and weight gain as medium protein, while the low protein diet had the lowest values. The average daily feed intake was affected by the treatments. Feed conversion was better in group fed on high and medium protein diets compared to group fed on low protein diet.

 

Table 2: Effect of protein levels on the performance of lambs.

 

Items

Treatment

LP

MP

HP

Initial weight (kg)

Final weight (kg)

Total weight gain (kg)

Av. daily gain (gm)

Av. daily feed intake (gm)

Feed conversion

30.05±1.20

41.90±1.20 b

11.85±0.15 b

131.67±6.10 b

1160±8.15 b

8.81±0.03 b

30.55±1.15

45.89±1.10 a*

15.34±0.50 a

170.44±5.25 a

1202±8.05 a

7.05±0.08 a

29.96±1.01

45.66±1.05a

15.70±0.30 a

174.44±5.82 a

1196±7.63 a

6.85±0.05 a

 

   *Figures in the same row having the same superscripts are not significantly different (P<0.05)

 

            Data in Table (3) revealed that increasing protein level in the diet of lambs improved digestion coefficients of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), ether extract (EE) and nitrogen free-extract (NFE). Highest values of digestible crude protein (DCP) and total digestible nutrients (TDN) were observed with groups fed on the diet containing high protein level compared with medium and lower protein diets.

Table 3: Effect of protein levels on the digestibility and nutritive values.

 

Items

Treatment

LP

MP

HP

Apparent digestibility (%):

DM

CP

CF

EE

NFE

Nutritive value:

DCP

TDN

 

65.12±1.01 c

56.59±0.86 c

36.90±1.02 c

68.30±1.03 c

69.60±1.56 c

 

7.09±0.25 c

66.28±1.50 c

 

70.15±1.20 b*

68.01±0.90 b

45.10±1.10 b

77.05±1.55 b

75.50±1.07 b

 

10.82±0.50 b

75.32±1.80 b

 

76.20±1.10 a

73.15±0.73 a

52.12±1.08 a

84.30±1.90 a

82.13±1.44 a

 

13.39±0.81 a

82.02±1.93 a

 

*Figures in the same row having the same superscripts are not significantly different (P<0.05)

 

            The biochemical parameters of blood of the different experimental groups are shown in Table (4). Total protein of blood, albumin, globulin and urea were increased with increasing protein level from low protein to high protein containing diet.

 

Table 4: Effect of protein levels on the blood biochemical parameters of lambs.

             

Items

Treatment

LP

MP

HP

Total protein (g/dl)

Albumin (g/dl)

Globulin (g/dl)

Urea (mg/dl)

5.15±0.07 b

2.56±0.03 b

2.59±0.06b

28.10±3.10 b

7.90±0.12 a

3.52±0.10 ab

4.38±0.05 a

48.23±4.40 a

8.62±0.10 a

4.72±0.07 a

3.90±0.11 a

46.11±4.50 a

 

*Figures in the same row having the same superscripts are not significantly different (P<0.05)

 

            Table (5) revealed the rumen characteristics of different experimental groups. Total volatile fatty acids and ruminal ammonia nitrogen concentrations were increased in lambs fed on diets containing high protein compared with medium and low protein diets.

 

Table 5: Effect of protein levels on the ruminal characteristics of lambs.

 

Items

Treatment

LP

MP

HP

pH

Total VFAs (meq/100ml)

NH3-N (meq/100ml)

5.75±0.09

6.51±0.10 c

13.50±0.25c

5.80±0.14

8.96±0.20 b

18.70±0.10 b

5.76±0.10

10.12±0.17 a

23.10±0.31 a

 

    *Figures in the same row having the same superscripts are not significantly different (P<0.05)

 

            The carcass traits of lambs fed on the experimental diets are shown in Table (6). Protein content had no effect on live weight at slaughter, dressing percentage, weights of internal organs and body fat weight.

 

Table 6: Effect of protein levels on carcass traits of lamb

 

Items

Treatment

LP

MP

HP

No of lambs

slaughter weight (kg)

Hot carcass weight (kg)

Dressing (%)

Heart (%)

Kidneys (%)

Liver (%)

Lungs (%)

Internal fat (kg)

3

39.20±2.10

20.82±1.10

53.11±0.05

0.38±0.01

0.28±0.05

2.01±0.15

1.40±0.01

1.20±0.07

3

42.70±2.35

22.93±1.25

53.70±0.01

0.39±0.03

0.25±0.01

1.80±0.05

1.38±0.04

1.24±0.02

3

44.10±2.50

23.51±1.15

53.31±0.02

0.39±0.01

0.26±0.02

1.85±0.10

1.40±0.02

1.30±0.05

 

Economical evaluation:

            Economical evaluation of the different experimental groups is presented in Table (7). The groups fed on the medium and high protein diets recorded the highest values in net revenue and economical feed efficiency, while the group fed on low protein diet recorded the lowest value.

 

Table 7: Economical evaluation of lambs performance in the different experimental groups

 

Items

Treatment

LP

MP

HP

Total feed cost (L.E)

Body weight gain (Kg)

Price of body weight gain (L.E)

Net revenue (L.E)

Economic feed efficiency (%)

Relative econ. feed efficiency (%)

166.00

11.85

177.75

11.75

7.08

100

177.42

15.34

230.10

52.68

29.69

419.35

185.19

15.70

235.50

50.31

27.17

383.76

 

DISCUSSION

 

Performance of animals:

There was a significant (P<0.05) difference in the feed intake between different experimental groups. The intake was increased with increasing the level of protein from low protein to medium or high protein. Fluharty and McClure (1997) illustrated increases (P<0.05) in dry matter intake when the protein level was increased in lamb rations. There was significant (P<0.05) differences in the weight gain between different treated groups. Similar results were reported in other studies (Mahouachi and Atti, 2005). This improvement of growth may be explained by an increase of the total supply of digestible crude protein in high and medium protein levels in comparison with low protein level. However, Fluharty and McClure (1997) found increased average daily gain in growing lambs when they increased the recommended NRC protein requirement by 25%. Increasing the level of dietary protein will change the fermentation process in the rumen causing an increase in total volatile fatty acids production and a rise in the ratio of propionate to volatile total fatty acids. These changes in the rumen will improve the lamb's energy balance allowing the storage of more nitrogen and an increase in body weight (Kabir et al., 2002). Increasing the protein content elevates the amino acid density and their absorption in the small intestine that subsequently improves animal growth (Pittrof et al., 2006). Our result showed non significant difference in the weight gain between medium and high level of protein. Similar result was found by Ahmed and Abdellatif (1995).       Consequently, the best feed conversion was obtained with medium and high protein groups compared with low protein group. Similar result was obtained by Manso et al. (1998). In this study there was no any further improvement in the growth when the level of protein was increased from medium to high protein level. This suggested that a level of about 14.7% in the dry matter of diet is sufficient for Rahmani lambs at that age and stage of growth and that no further benefit is going to accrue by enhancing the protein level in the diet. It was probable that no further improvement in growth was seen when the protein level increased from medium to high level, since this excess protein might be degraded in the rumen as reported by Krishna Mohan et al. (1987). Devendra (1982) and Balakrishina et al. (1997) indicated that the increase in growth rate of lambs with increasing protein intake up to a certain level and then it declined when the protein content increased beyond 14 or 15%. On the other hand, Manso et al. (1998) observed that diets of higher CP contents were better taken in, presented higher average daily gain and better feed conversion. The authors attributed the increased intake to greater ruminal activity and passage rate.

 

Digestion coefficient of nutrients:

            There was significant (P<0.05) increases in the apparent digestion coefficients of DM, CP, EE, CF and NFE as the level of protein increased. Similar results were obtained by Etman (1985); Krishna Mohan et al. (1987) and Kumar and Narange (1991) who found that the apparent digestibility of DM, CP, EE, CF and NFE were increased as the level of protein increased in the diet of sheep and it may be attributed to that low protein may reduce rumen function and lower the efficiency of feed utilization. Dabiri and Thonney (2004) reported that an improvement in CP digestibility by growing lambs as CP levels increased. In addition, CP digestibility levels were higher in lamb fed with higher CP levels (Kaya and Yalcin, 2000; and Dabiri and Thonney, 2004). Regarding the nutritive values of the experimental diets, DCP and TDN contents were increased linearly with increased level of protein. Similar result was obtained with Abou'l Ella et al. (2005).

Biochemical parameters:

            There was significant (P<0.05) increases in the total protein, albumin and globulin as the protein level increased. Similar results were obtained by Katunguka (1997) and Hoffman et al. (2001) who found that the animal fed on high protein diets had significantly higher total protein, albumin and globulin than those on low protein. Urea nitrogen was increased significantly (P<0.05) by increasing dietary CP. The changes in serum urea levels by increasing dietary CP level are agreed with results of prior studies (Katunguka, 1997; Hatfield et al., 1998; Dabiri and Thonney, 2004; Yurtman et al., 2002 & Keser and Bilalt, 2008). The increase in urea nitrogen concentration that comes from increasing diet protein concentrations, is caused by an increase in rumen ammonia absorption, resulting in greater amounts of ammonia being used in the liver to synthesis urea. Therefore, urea concentration in blood reflects the ingestion of dietary protein (Thomas et al., 1988).

Rumen characteristics:

The levels of protein had no significant effect on the pH of the rumen. Ammonia-N concentration and total volatile fatty acids were significantly (P<0.05) increased with the increase in the protein level of the diets. Similar result was obtained by Hatfield et al. (1998) who reported that TVFAs concentration was increased with the increasing protein level in the diet of sheep, while Ludden et al. (2002) found no significant effect. Febel et al. (2000) stated that the rumen concentration of ammonia increased in response to the rising level of protein in the diet of sheep. It is also pointed that rumen ammonia nitrogen and VFAS levels increased by the dietary increasing CP level (Kaya and Yalcin, 2000). Kaya et al. (2009) found no significant difference between lambs groups in case of ruminal fluid pH and VFAS levels, but ammonia nitrogen level increased with the dietary protein levels.

Carcass characteristics:

There were no significant differences in the carcass characteristics between treated groups. These agreed with that found by Rocha et al. (2004); Mahouachi and Atti (2005) and Woolley et al. (2005) who found no significant effect for protein on carcass characteristics.

It can be concluded that optimum dietary CP level for Rahmani lambs is 14.7% because of feeding lambs with higher protein level than 14.7% had no evident advantages for performance and production.

 

REFERENCES

 

A.O.A.C. (1990): Official Methods of Analysis. 13th Ed. Association of Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.USA.

A.R.C., Agricultural Research Council (1980): The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. London, CAB.

Abou'l Ella, A.A.; Abdou, S.G.; Sayed, A.N. and Higazy, A. (2005): Effect of different levels of dietary protein on performance, nutrient utilization and metabolism of some minerals by lambs. Egyptian J. Nutr. and Feeds., 8(1):1-14.

Ahmed, M.M. and Abdellatif, A.M. (1995): Effect of dietary protein level on thermoregulation, digestion and water economy in desert sheep. Small Rum.Res., 18(1): 51-56.

Andrews, R.P. and Orskov, E.R. (1970): The nutrition of early weaned lamb. J.Agric.Sci., 75:11-18.

Balakrishina, G.; Raghaven, G.V.; Janardhan, T. and Naldu, M. (1997): Effect of feeding different levels of protein on growth and feed efficiency in crossbred lambs. Ind. Vet. J., 74: 220-222.

Dabiri, N. and Thonney, M.L. (2004): Source and level of supplemental protein for growing lambs.J Anim.  Sci., 82:3237-3244.

Devendra, C. (1982): Strategies other than breeding for the development of small ruminants. Proc. Of Workshop held at Brazil.

Duncan, D.B. (1955): Multiple Range and Multiple F test. Biometric, 11:1-42.

Etman, K.E. (1985): The effect of level concentrate feeding and roughage on meat production. Ph.D.Diss., Fac. of Agric., Zagazig Univ.

Febel, H.; Huszar, S. and Harczi, I.Z. (2000): Effects of dietary protein and carbohydrate source on rumen fermentation and nutrient flow in sheep. Acta Vet. Hung., 48(2): 161-171.

Fluharty, F.L. and McClure, K.E. (1997): Effects of dietary energy intake and protein concentration on performance and visceral organ mass in lambs. J.Anim.Sci., 75:604-610.

Hatfield, P.G.; Hopkins, J.A.; Ramsey, W.S. and Gilmore, A. (1998): Effects of level of protein and type of molasses on digesta kinetics and blood metabolites in sheep. Small Rum.Res., 28(2): 161-170

Hoffman, P.C.; Esser, N.M.; Bauman, L.M.; Engston, M. and Chester-Jones (2001): Effect of dietary protein on growth and nitrogen balance of Holstein heifers. J.Dairy Sci., 84(4): 843-847.

Katunguka, E. (1997): The influence of dietary protein on some blood biochemical parameters in Scottish blackface sheep. Vet. Parasitol., 68(3): 227-240.

Kaya, I. and Yalcin, S. (2000): The effects of rations containing different amounts of common vetch seed on growth performance, digestibility and some blood and rumen metabolites in male lambs. Turk.J.Vet.Anim.Sci., 24:307-315.

Kaya, I.; Unal, Y.; Sahin, T. and Elmali, D. (2009): Effect of different protein levels on fattening performance, digestibility and rumen parameters in finishing lambs. J. of Anim. & Vet. Adv., 8(2): 309-312.

Keser, O. and Bilat, S. (2008): Effect of different dietary crude protein levels on performance, N digestibility and some blood parameters in Kivircik lambs. Acta Vet., 58 (5-6):487-498.

Krishna-Mohan, D.K.; Krishna-Reddy, K. and Srirama Murthy, A. (1987): Protein requirements of Crossbred lambs. Ind. J. Anim. Sci., 50(10): 1121-1127.

Kumar, S. and Narange, M.P. (1991): Effect of different planes of nutrition on the performance of Gaddii male kids using concentrate rations and Kiku grass hay. J.Anim.Sci., 61(8): 869-872.

Ludden, P.A.; Wechter, T. and Hess, B. (2002): Effect of oscillating dietary protein on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism and gastrointestinal organ mass in sheep. J.Anim.Sci., 80(11): 3021-3026.

Mahouachi, M. and Atti, N. (2005): The effect of protein supplement of poor hay fed D'man lamb on their growth, carcass quality and meat composition. J. of Anim. and Vet. Adv., 4(2): 214-220.

Manso, T.; Mantecon, A.R.; Giraldez, F.J.; Lavin, P. and Castro, T. (1998): Animal performance and chemical body composition of lambs fed diets with different protein supplements. Small Rum. Res., 29:185-191.

Negesse, T.; Rodehutscord, M. and Pfeffer, E. (2001): The effect of dietary crude protein level on intake, growth, protein retention and utilization of growing male saanen kids. Small Rum. Res., 39:243-251.

NRC (1981): Nutrient requirements of sheep. 6th ed., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

NRC, National Research Council (1985): Nutrient requirements of sheep. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Pittrof, W.; Keisler, D.H. and Blackburn, H.D. (2006): Effects of high-protein, low-energy diet in finishing lambs; 1-Feed intake, estimated nutrient uptake and levels of plasma metabolites and metabolic hormones. Livestock Sci., 101 (1-3): 262-277.

Rocha, M.H.; Susin I.; Pires, A.V.; Souza, J.; Fernandes, J. and Mendes, C.Q. (2004): Performance of Santa Ines lambs fed diets of variable crude protein levels. Sci. Agric., 61(2): 141-145.

SAS (1990): SAS/STAT. "Guide for personal computers" SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Thomas, V.M.; Mclnerney, M.J. and Kott, R.W. (1988): Influence of body condition and lasalocid during late gestation on blood metabolities, lamb birth weight an colostrums composition and production in Finn-cross ewes. J.Anim.Sci., 66: 783-791.

Titi, H.H.; Tabbaa, M.J.; Amasheh, M.G.; Barakeh, F. and Daqamseh, B. (2000): Comparative performance of awassi lambs and black goat kids on different crude protein levels in Jordan. Small Rum Res, 37:131-135.

Woolley, D.K.; May, B.J. and Salisbury, M.W. (2005): Effect of protein level on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of Texas Rambouillet feeder lambs. Proc. Am. Soc. of Anim.Sci., 139-142.

Yurtman, I.Y.; Savas, T.; Karaagac, F. and Coskuntuna, L. (2002): Effects of dietary protein intake levels on the oral stereotypic behaviours in energy restricted lambs. Appl Anim.Behav. Sci., 1-12.

 
A.O.A.C. (1990): Official Methods of Analysis. 13th Ed. Association of Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.USA.
A.R.C., Agricultural Research Council (1980): The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. London, CAB.
Abou'l Ella, A.A.; Abdou, S.G.; Sayed, A.N. and Higazy, A. (2005): Effect of different levels of dietary protein on performance, nutrient utilization and metabolism of some minerals by lambs. Egyptian J. Nutr. and Feeds., 8(1):1-14.
Ahmed, M.M. and Abdellatif, A.M. (1995): Effect of dietary protein level on thermoregulation, digestion and water economy in desert sheep. Small Rum.Res., 18(1): 51-56.
Andrews, R.P. and Orskov, E.R. (1970): The nutrition of early weaned lamb. J.Agric.Sci., 75:11-18.
Balakrishina, G.; Raghaven, G.V.; Janardhan, T. and Naldu, M. (1997): Effect of feeding different levels of protein on growth and feed efficiency in crossbred lambs. Ind. Vet. J., 74: 220-222.
Dabiri, N. and Thonney, M.L. (2004): Source and level of supplemental protein for growing lambs.J Anim.  Sci., 82:3237-3244.
Devendra, C. (1982): Strategies other than breeding for the development of small ruminants. Proc. Of Workshop held at Brazil.
Duncan, D.B. (1955): Multiple Range and Multiple F test. Biometric, 11:1-42.
Etman, K.E. (1985): The effect of level concentrate feeding and roughage on meat production. Ph.D.Diss., Fac. of Agric., Zagazig Univ.
Febel, H.; Huszar, S. and Harczi, I.Z. (2000): Effects of dietary protein and carbohydrate source on rumen fermentation and nutrient flow in sheep. Acta Vet. Hung., 48(2): 161-171.
Fluharty, F.L. and McClure, K.E. (1997): Effects of dietary energy intake and protein concentration on performance and visceral organ mass in lambs. J.Anim.Sci., 75:604-610.
Hatfield, P.G.; Hopkins, J.A.; Ramsey, W.S. and Gilmore, A. (1998): Effects of level of protein and type of molasses on digesta kinetics and blood metabolites in sheep. Small Rum.Res., 28(2): 161-170
Hoffman, P.C.; Esser, N.M.; Bauman, L.M.; Engston, M. and Chester-Jones (2001): Effect of dietary protein on growth and nitrogen balance of Holstein heifers. J.Dairy Sci., 84(4): 843-847.
Katunguka, E. (1997): The influence of dietary protein on some blood biochemical parameters in Scottish blackface sheep. Vet. Parasitol., 68(3): 227-240.
Kaya, I. and Yalcin, S. (2000): The effects of rations containing different amounts of common vetch seed on growth performance, digestibility and some blood and rumen metabolites in male lambs. Turk.J.Vet.Anim.Sci., 24:307-315.
Kaya, I.; Unal, Y.; Sahin, T. and Elmali, D. (2009): Effect of different protein levels on fattening performance, digestibility and rumen parameters in finishing lambs. J. of Anim. & Vet. Adv., 8(2): 309-312.
Keser, O. and Bilat, S. (2008): Effect of different dietary crude protein levels on performance, N digestibility and some blood parameters in Kivircik lambs. Acta Vet., 58 (5-6):487-498.
Krishna-Mohan, D.K.; Krishna-Reddy, K. and Srirama Murthy, A. (1987): Protein requirements of Crossbred lambs. Ind. J. Anim. Sci., 50(10): 1121-1127.
Kumar, S. and Narange, M.P. (1991): Effect of different planes of nutrition on the performance of Gaddii male kids using concentrate rations and Kiku grass hay. J.Anim.Sci., 61(8): 869-872.
Ludden, P.A.; Wechter, T. and Hess, B. (2002): Effect of oscillating dietary protein on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism and gastrointestinal organ mass in sheep. J.Anim.Sci., 80(11): 3021-3026.
Mahouachi, M. and Atti, N. (2005): The effect of protein supplement of poor hay fed D'man lamb on their growth, carcass quality and meat composition. J. of Anim. and Vet. Adv., 4(2): 214-220.
Manso, T.; Mantecon, A.R.; Giraldez, F.J.; Lavin, P. and Castro, T. (1998): Animal performance and chemical body composition of lambs fed diets with different protein supplements. Small Rum. Res., 29:185-191.
Negesse, T.; Rodehutscord, M. and Pfeffer, E. (2001): The effect of dietary crude protein level on intake, growth, protein retention and utilization of growing male saanen kids. Small Rum. Res., 39:243-251.
NRC (1981): Nutrient requirements of sheep. 6th ed., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
NRC, National Research Council (1985): Nutrient requirements of sheep. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Pittrof, W.; Keisler, D.H. and Blackburn, H.D. (2006): Effects of high-protein, low-energy diet in finishing lambs; 1-Feed intake, estimated nutrient uptake and levels of plasma metabolites and metabolic hormones. Livestock Sci., 101 (1-3): 262-277.
Rocha, M.H.; Susin I.; Pires, A.V.; Souza, J.; Fernandes, J. and Mendes, C.Q. (2004): Performance of Santa Ines lambs fed diets of variable crude protein levels. Sci. Agric., 61(2): 141-145.
SAS (1990): SAS/STAT. "Guide for personal computers" SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Thomas, V.M.; Mclnerney, M.J. and Kott, R.W. (1988): Influence of body condition and lasalocid during late gestation on blood metabolities, lamb birth weight an colostrums composition and production in Finn-cross ewes. J.Anim.Sci., 66: 783-791.
Titi, H.H.; Tabbaa, M.J.; Amasheh, M.G.; Barakeh, F. and Daqamseh, B. (2000): Comparative performance of awassi lambs and black goat kids on different crude protein levels in Jordan. Small Rum Res, 37:131-135.
Woolley, D.K.; May, B.J. and Salisbury, M.W. (2005): Effect of protein level on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of Texas Rambouillet feeder lambs. Proc. Am. Soc. of Anim.Sci., 139-142.
Yurtman, I.Y.; Savas, T.; Karaagac, F. and Coskuntuna, L. (2002): Effects of dietary protein intake levels on the oral stereotypic behaviours in energy restricted lambs. Appl Anim.Behav. Sci.,