PATHOGENESIS OF COLUMNARIS DISEASE IN AFRICAN SHARPTOOTH CATFISH, CLARIAS GARIEPINUS

Authors

1 Fish Diseases and Management, Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

2 Fish Diseases and Management, Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the pathogenesis of columnarisdisease in African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus.  Flavobacterium columnare infections were detected in 33 (22.9%) fish out of 144 fish collected and examined over a year, in Assiut, Egypt.  The present study demonstrated that parasitic infestation increases the susceptibility of fish to columnarisdisease and plays an important role in initiation of natural infection. A reproducible model of experimental infection was developed to help studying the pathogenesis using immersion with either skin or gill scarification of challenged fish. Fish challenged through immersion with scarification developed severe signs of infections and showed mortalities, while fish challenged without scarification did not develop typical signs of infection and survived until the end of the experiment. F. columnare strain SK8FC isolated from skin of naturally infected fish was used throughout the challenge study. The invasion of F. columnare was enhanced by either skin or gill abrasion. Clinical signs and mortalities were more severe and rapidly developed in the gill-scarified group than in skin sacrificed group. Immunohistochemistry staining and histopathology studies were conducted to investigate the target organs, the distribution of the bacterium, and the pathological changes. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that the skin and gills were the main organs of F. columnare localization and the main organs expressing histopathological alterations. Skin and gill tissues were more strongly stained for F. columnare in scarified groups than in non-scarified group.
 

Keywords


Fish Diseases and Management, Department of Animal Medicine,

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, AssiutUniversity, Assiut, Egypt.

 

Pathogenesis of Columnaris Disease in African Sharptooth Catfish,

                           Clarias gariepinus                          

(With 2 Tables and 4 Figures)

 

By

A.A. Elkamel; Sh.M. Ahmed and H.H. Mohammed

(Received at 19/8/2010)

 

کيفية حدوث مرض الکولمنارس فى الأسماک القطية النيلية (القراميط الأفريقية)

 

احمد عبد الهادى الکامل ، شعبان محمد احمد ، هيثم حسين محمد

 

تناول هذا البحث اجراء دراسة ميدانية حول کيفية حدوث مرض الکولمنارس فى الأسماک القطية النيلية (القراميطالأفريقية) بمحافظة أسيوط – جمهورية مصر العربية. وقد تم اکتشاف العدوى بميکروب الفلافوباکتيريم کولمنارى المسبب للمرض فى عدد 33 عينة (22,9%) من إجمالى عدد 144 سمکة تم فحصهاعلى مدار عام. هذه الدراسة أوضحت أن الإصابة بالطفيليات  تزيد من عرضة أسماک القراميط للإصابة بالعدوى بميکروب الفلافوباکتيريم کولمنارى وتلعب دورا هاما فى إحداث العدوى فى الطبيعة. وتضمنت هذه الدراسة إنشاء نموذج للعدوى الاصطناعية بميکروب الفلافوباکتيريم کولمنارى باستخدام الغمر مع خدش جلد أو خياشيم الأسماک. الأسماک التى تعرضت للميکروب بواسطة الغمربدون خدش لم تظهر عليها أعراض العدوى وبقيت حية حتى نهاية التجربة. تم استخدام عتره ميکروب الفلافوباکتيريم کولمنارى (SK8FC) والتى تم عزلها من جلد أسماک مصابة طبيعيا فى إجراء العدوى الاصطناعية لهذه الدراسة. وقد أدى إحداث خدش إما فى الجلد أو الخياشيم إلى تعزيز اختراق ميکروب الفلافوباکتيريم کولمنارى لجسم الأسماک المعرضة للميکروب. الأعراض الإکلينيکية والوفيات کانت أکثر عنفا وظهرت أسرع فى حالة خدش الخياشيم عنها فى حالة خدش الجلد. وکذلک تم دراسة الصبغ بواسطة الإميونوهستوکيمسترى ودراسة الهستوباثولوجى للکشف عن أعضاء الجسم التى يستهدفها الميکروب بصورة أساسية وتوزيعه والتغيرات المرضية التى يسببها. أوضح الصبغ بواسطة الإميونوهستوکيمسترى أن الجلد والخياشيم هما العضوان الأساسيان لتمرکز الإصابة بميکروب الفلافوباکتيريم کولمنارى وهما أيضا العضوان الأساسيان اللذان يظهر عليهما التغيرات الهستوباثولوجية، کما أظهر نسيجا الجلد والخياشيم درجة صبغة عالية لميکروب الفلافوباکتيريم کولمنارى فى المجموعات التى تم خدشها عنه فى المجموعة التى لم يتم خدشها.

 

Summary

 

This study was conducted to investigate the pathogenesis of columnarisdisease in African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus.  Flavobacterium columnare infections were detected in 33 (22.9%) fish out of 144 fish collected and examined over a year, in Assiut, Egypt.  The present study demonstrated that parasitic infestation increases the susceptibility of fish to columnarisdisease and plays an important role in initiation of natural infection. A reproducible model of experimental infection was developed to help studying the pathogenesis using immersion with either skin or gill scarification of challenged fish. Fish challenged through immersion with scarification developed severe signs of infections and showed mortalities, while fish challenged without scarification did not develop typical signs of infection and survived until the end of the experiment. F. columnare strain SK8FC isolated from skin of naturally infected fish was used throughout the challenge study. The invasion of F. columnare was enhanced by either skin or gill abrasion. Clinical signs and mortalities were more severe and rapidly developed in the gill-scarified group than in skin sacrificed group. Immunohistochemistry staining and histopathology studies were conducted to investigate the target organs, the distribution of the bacterium, and the pathological changes. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that the skin and gills were the main organs of F. columnare localization and the main organs expressing histopathological alterations. Skin and gill tissues were more strongly stained for F. columnare in scarified groups than in non-scarified group.

 

Key words: African sharptooth catfish, Flavobacterium columnare, pathogenesis, immunohistochemistry, challenge model.

 

Introduction

 

Flavobacterium columnare has been recognized as a worldwide pathogen of freshwater fish that causes columnaris disease, one of the oldest known fish diseases in the world. It affects a wide variety of fish including wild, cultured and ornamental fish in both freshwater and saltwater environments (Shamsudin 1994; Plumb 1999 and Shotts and Starliper 1999). The ubiquitous distribution of F. columnare in fresh water environments and the tendency of fish to acquire the disease after mechanical and/or environmental stress make F. columnare among the most detected pathogens in cultured, ornamental, and wild fish populations (Shamsudin and Plumb 1996; Shotts and Starliper 1999).

Columnaris disease leads to significant losses and high mortalities, especially during spring and autumn (Pacha and Ordal 1970 and Becker and Fujihara 1978), and more to be expected when fish are stressed (Durborow et al., 1998). Clinical signs are restricted to the external surface of fish, mainly skin and gills. Skin ulcerations started at the base of the dorsal fin and then extended laterally around the body. In addition, fin rot and respiratory manifestations are common.

Despite the increasing significance of the disease, the actual mechanism of pathogenesis of F. columnare infections has only been partially elucidated, hampering the development of preventive measures to efficiently combat this disease condition (Nematollahi et al., 2003). Little is known about F. columnare infections in African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus, therefore, unlocking the pathogenesis and virulence mechanisms of F. columnare may ultimately provide the knowledge necessary for designing more effective means of control.

Because of the difficulties in reproducing the F. columnare infections experimentally, previous studies describing the infections in African sharptooth catfish usually relied on natural infections. There are no standardized models of experimental infection, enzymatic, immunological, or genetic methods that can be used economically to study F. columnare in clinical situations and this has further deterred understanding the pathogenesis of the infections. In addition, most previous studies focused on describing the clinical signs and lesions (Ahmed et al., 2007), rather than investigating the porta of entry, invasion, site of localization, factors that help induction of the disease.

The present study was conducted to investigate the pathogenesis of columnaris in African sharptooth catfish through developing a model of experimental infection, studying how the infections start, detecting the porta of entry and the target organs, and developing an immunohistochemistry technique to detect the site where the bacteria localize during the infection.

 

MATERIALS and METHODS

 

Fish collection:

A total number of 144 alive African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus were randomly caught from different localities of The River Nile and El-Ibrahemia canal, AssiutCity, over a year (12 fish/month).  Collected fish have a body weight range of 120 to 900g and total length range of 25 to 55cm. Fish were transported immediately to the Aquatic Animals Wet Lab., Veterinary Hospital Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, AssiutUniversity to be examined.

Clinical and Bacteriological Examination of fish Samples:

Fish were examined for clinical signs, external and possible internal lesions according to Stoskopf (1993). Opercula were removed to expose the gill tissues and samples were cultured onto cytophaga agar medium (Anacker and Ordal, 1959) and incubated at 25º for 48 hours. Samples from the skin mucus, fins, liver, spleen and kidney were also cultured directly on cytophaga agar medium.

Identification of bacterial isolates:

            Purified bacterial isolates were identified based on the colony morphology, color and cultural characteristics on cytophaga agar, microscopic examination (Gram stain and motility test), various biochemical characters that include flexirubin pigment test, oxidase, catalase, indole, voges proskauer, methyl red, H2S production and carbohydrate utilization (lactose, glucose, arabinose, raffinose, xylose, sucrose and maltose) according to Cruickshank et al. (1975) and Austin and Austin (1987).

Pathogenicity of Flavobacterium columnare to Clarias gariepinus:

Fish: A total number of 254 apparently healthy C. gariepinus with an average body weight of 80-120 g and total length range of 20-27 cm were obtained from fish ponds at El-Minia Governorate and used for experimental challenge.  Fish were housed in 400 L tanks at the Aquatic Animal Wet Lab., and 20 fish were randomly examined to exclude F. columnare infections. Water was circulated at an exchange rate of 0.5 L/min, and daily dissolved oxygen was 6.5±0.2 mg/L and temperature was maintained at 25±1ºC. Fish were acclimated for 2 weeks in 100 L glass aquaria according to the protocol of maintaining bioassay fish described by Ellsaesser and Clem (1986).

Rapid haemagglutination test:This test was performed to detect the presence of a haemagglutinating agent in the pathogen according to Grimes (2002). Briefly, a drop of 10% catfish red blood cells was placed on a clear glass slide. One drop of Phosphate buffered saline (control) or bacterial suspension of selected F. columnare strains was added. Positive agglutination was indicated by clumping in red blood cells. Based on the intensity and time of onset of clumping, F. columnare strain (SK8FC) was selected to conduct the experimental challenge study. There is a virulence relationship between HA activity and F. columnare infectivity in channel catfish and it was noted that a positive relation existed between in vitro epithelial cell adherence and isolate virulence (DelCorral, 1988).

Bacterial strain: F. columnare strain (SK8FC) isolated from skin of infected fish was passed three times through skin scarification of African sharptooth catfish to be used for experimental challenge.

Bacterial challenge suspension and counts: Colony forming units (cfu) counts in bacterial suspensions were determined using spectrophometery optical density values at wavelength of 600nm and standard-plate-count method with ten-fold serial dilution (Elkamel and Thune 2003). Counts were determined on BHI plates with 4% agar to inhibit gliding activities of F. columnare. The challenge suspension was prepared by growing            F. columnare in BHI broth at 25°C until mid-log phase (optical density of 0.5 that equals to 5.6 × 106 cfu/ ml), then the dilution was made to a final concentration of 1.4 × 106 cfu/ml.

Experimental infection: Acclimated C. gariepinus were divided equally into 6 groups (13 fish each). Fish of each group were challenged through immersion for 20 min in the challenge suspension. F. columnare bacterial suspension was used to challenge 3 groups. The first group was challenged with scarification of skin at the base of dorsal fin, while the second group was challenged with scarification of gills (Fish and Rucker 1943). The third group was challenged without any scarification. Two control groups were similarly treated as challenged groups by either skin or gill scarification, but immersed in the same volume of sterile BHI broth with no bacteria, while a third control group was immersed in the same volume of sterile water with no scarification (Table 1). Clinical signs and mortalities were recorded daily over 15 days and re-isolation and identification of bacteria was done from freshly dead and moribund fish as described above. The whole experiment was repeated three times.

 

Table 1: Experimental infection of African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus, with Flavobacterium columnare.

 

Group

Immersion suspension

Route

Challenged

Flavobacterium columnare

(1.4 × 106 cfu/ml)

Skin scarification

Gill scarification

No scarification

Control

Sterile BHI broth

Skin scarification

Sterile BHI broth

Gill scarification

Sterile water

No scarification

 

Histopathological examinations:

Small tissue specimens of moribund challenged fish were collected from the skin and gills and rapidly fixed in 10% neutral buffer formalin (Bullock, 1989). Fixed specimens were processed and paraffin sections were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for microscopical examination according to Drury and Wallington (1980).

Immunohistochemistry:

Preparation of rabbit antisera against F. columnare: Antisera against F. columnare were prepared according to Anderson and Dixon (1984).  Briefly, two-male New Zealand White rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), each weighing about 2 kg were injected subcutaneously and intramuscularly with 5 ml of F. columnare bacterin that was previously prepared according to Garvey et al. (1977) and 1 ml Freund’s complete adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Three weeks post initial inoculation, the rabbits were re-injected with 5 ml of F. columnare bacterin without adjuvant.

               One week post the 2nd inoculation, inoculated rabbits were anaesthetized and blood was collected from the eyes. Serum was collected by centrifugation, and stored at -20 ºC. To estimate the antibody titer, the pooled sera against F. columnare were analyzed by tube agglutination method. The best working serum dilution was found to be 1:40 of the original pooled sera.

Staining: Tissue samples of the skin and gills of experimentally infected C. gariepinus were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin for immunohistochemical processing. Staining was performed using immunohistochmistry Kit (Ultravision Detection System, Suffolk, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

 

Results

                                                                       

Clinical Examination:

Examined wild fish showed a wide variety of skin and gill lesions. The main clinical signs observed on naturally infected fish were erosions and ulceration of skin at the base of the dorsal fin and on the head (Fig. 1), and fin rot with separated fin rays, in addition to paleness of gill color and sloughing of gill filaments. Microscopic examination of wet mounts from eroded areas of infected skin or gills revealed the presence of masses of long bacterial cells.

Parasitological examination:

Parasitological examination of the 144 fish collected in the present study revealed that 114 (81.4%) fish were infested with Quadriacanthus sp., Trichodina sp., Icththyophthirius sp., Henneguya sp. or digenea trematodes, while only 30 fish were clinically negative for external parasites.

Bacteriological isolation and identification:

Bacteriological examination of collected samples resulted in recovery of 112 suspected Flavobacterium isolates from skin, gills and kidney of the 144 examined fish. Primary identification of isolates was done according to cultural and morphological characters, while comprehensive identification of these isolates was done according to their biochemical characters (Austin and Austin 1987) and 36 isolates was identified as Flavobacterium columnare (Table 2).

Table 2: Phenotypic characteristics of suspected Flavobacterium columnare isolates.

 

Biochemical reactions

Flavobacterium  columnare

Gram stain

Gram negative

Flexirubin pigment

35/36

Gliding motility

36/36

Oxidase

36/36

Catalase

31/36

Indole

3/36

Vogus Proskauer

0/36

Methyl red

0/36

H2S production

28/36

Glucose

1/36

Sucrose

0/36

Raffinose

3/36

Maltose

2/36

Lactose

0/36

Arabinose

0/36

Xylose

1/36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 1: African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus, naturally infected with Flavobacterium columnare showing ulcer (arrow) in the head area and at the base of the dorsal fin.

Prevalence of natural infection:

Thirty six Flavobavterium columnare strains were isolated from 33 (22.9%) out of 144 African sharptooth catfish examined. F. columnare was isolated from gills, skin and kidney of the naturally infected fish, while was not isolated from either liver or spleen. Results indicated that F. columnare was isolated from the gills (51.52%) and skin (48.48%) at significantly higher rates (p<0.05) than from kidneys (9.09%). Out of the 33 infected fish, mixed infection of F. columnare and parasitic infestation) were detected at significantly higher rates (75.76%), where p<0.05, than in fish with only flavobacterial infection (24.24%).

Experimental infection

1- Fish infected through immersion with skin scarification:

Clinical signs and mortalities began to appear within 24 hours post challenge. Loss of appetite, sluggish movement, loss of balance, frayed fins and fin rot especially in dorsal fin were evident. By the end of the first day, the average number of dead fish was 3, and by the second day 3.33 fish died. The survived fish after the third day showed respiratory manifestations and fish were found near the water surface opening their mouth and gasping air, while others were moribund near the bottom with respiratory distress. By the fifth day, 3.67 fish were dead showing ulceration and loss of skin on both sides of the body (Fig. 2), started small at the base of the dorsal fin then enlarged to encircle the entire body giving the characteristic appearance of “saddle-back lesion” and pale gills at necropsy. After 15 days, fin rot of the dorsal and caudal fins were evident on all fish survived. The average mortality rate in this group was 76.9%.

2- Fish infected through immersion with gill scarification:

Challenged fish showed the same described signs as those appeared on fish challenged with skin scarification but with faster onset and more severity. Shortly, post challenge rapid onset of skin loss, loss of balance and vertical hanging of fish were evident. After only about 8 hours, fish started to die with almost complete loss of skin. Marked respiratory manifestations were clearly observed 12 hours post challenge. Then, 3.67 fish died 18 hours post challenge. Two days later, all the remaining fish were dead with erosions, ulceration and loss of the skin. At necropsy, pale coloration of gills with sloughing at the periphery of gill filaments were observed. The average mortality rate in this group was 100%.

3- Fish infected through immersion without scarification:

Interestingly, these fish survived till the end of the experiment and did not develop typical signs of infection. Only one fish in two replicates of the experiment showed loss of skin and died by the third day post challenge. The average mortality rate in this group was 7.7%.

4- The control groups:

The control fish did not show any clinical signs and remain alive without mortalities after the 15th day of the experiment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 2: African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus, challenged by 1.4X106 colony forming units/ml of Flavobacterium columnare with skin scarification showing complete loss of epidermis (arrow points to the site of skin scarification).

 

Histopathology:

The skin and gills of African sharptooth catfish were the main organs affected. In the present study, fish exposed to F. columnare without scarification had intact epidermis. Myofibrillar degeneration, muscular hemorrhage and few inflammatory cellular reaction between the muscle bundles were, however, observed when compared to the control. While, the skin of fish exposed to F. columnare with either skin or gill scarification had complete absence of the epidermis layer (Fig. 3B).

Sever hyperplastic changes were observed in the gills of fish exposed to the bacteria and skin scarification (Fig. 3C). The gills of challenged catfish without scarification had slight interlamellar hyperplasia. While, the gills of fish being scarified and exposed to the bacteria showed necrosis of the interlamellar epithelium as well as the epithelium of the secondary gill lamellae in comparison to the control gills (Fig. 3D). 

 

 

 

Fig. 3: (A) Normal skin of African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus, showing the epidermis (E), dermis (D) and muscular layer (M). (B) Skin of C. gariepinus exposed to Flavobacterium columnare with skin scarification showing complete absence of epidermis. (C) Gills of             C. gariepinus exposed to F. columnare with skin scarification showing sever hyperplastic changes of the interlamellar epithelium (arrows). (D) Gills of C. gariepinus exposed to F. columnare with gill scarification showing necrosis of the interlamellar epithelium (arrow) and the epithelium of the secondary lamellae. Hematoxylne and Eosin. X=128

 

Immunohistochemistry:

In the present investigation, flavobacterial antigens were detected by immunohistochemistry in skin and gill sections of C. gariepinus challenged with F. columnare. Strong positively stained bacterial antigen were often found in all layers of skin and gills in catfish which challenged by bacteria and scarification either in skin or gills. The bacterial antigen was localized by a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbit and subsequent detection steps resulted in a brown-colored product that can be visualized by light microscopy (Fig. 4).

The immunostaining of tissue sections from fish challenged with F. columnare without scarifications showed weak positive-stained flavobacterial antigen in all layers of skin and gills except the primary lamellae of gills. No immunostaining was observed in skin and gills of control groups (Fig. 4).

 

 

Fig. 4: Immunolocalization of flavobacteria in skin and gills of Clarias gariepinus. (A) Gills of the control group. (B) Skin of the control group. (C) Gills of C. gariepinus exposed to Flavobacterium columnare challenge with gill scarification showing brown pigmentation of the flavobacterial antigen. (D) Skin of C. gariepinus exposed to F. columnare challenge with skin scarification showing brown pigmentation of the flavobacterial antigen

Discussion

 

The present study was conducted to study the pathogenesis of columnaris in African sharptooth catfish.  This study investigated how the infections started and factors affecting their induction, the target organs, and the clinical signs resulted from advancing of the infections. Moreover, a model for experimental challenge of African sharptooth catfish with      F. columnare was developed, in the present study, that helps to further study the pathogenesis of the infections.

The present study proved that F. columnare causes considerable infections among wild African sharptooth catfish in Assiut, Egypt.            F. columnare, the causative agent of columnaris disease (Austin and Austin 1987), has been identified as one of the most problematic pathogens in the freshwater finnish farming industry (Suomalainen et al., 2005). Despite its significance as a pathogen, relatively little is known about the pathogenicity of F. columnare, and virulence mechanisms by which it establishes the infections (Kunttu et al., 2009). A key point in the definitive control of flavobacterial infections is to understand its pathogenesis and what make them successful pathogens. The mechanism(s) by which flavobacteria establishes an infection remains largely unexplored and the literature is somewhat contradictory.

In the present study, a reproducible model for the production of experimental F. columnare infections in African sharptooth catfish was developed to better understand the pathogenesis of the disease in catfish. A widely used, but not well-documented challenge model for F. columnare utilizes the scarification or abrasion of the host prior to bath immersion (Bader et al., 2003).

In contrast to the majority of fish pathogens, artificial infection by a highly virulent strain of F. columnare is more effective by contact exposure than by injection (Pacha and Ordal, 1970). Contact exposure also represents a more natural way to produce columnaris infection than injection whereas intramuscular injection bypasses all the natural defense mechanisms such as skin and mucus. In experimental models with            F. columnare, clinical signs of the induced infection do not usually occur as a spontaneous infection but requires some type of physical or environmental stress like abrasion or scarification to gills or skin as suggested by Post (1987), Noga (1996), Durborow et al. (1998) and Bader et al.(2003).

The experimental challenge in the current study proved that skin or gill "injury" is essential to establish F. columnare in African sharptooth catfish as was demonstrated by the groups that were challenged only with the bacteria but without skin or gill scarification. Such groups failed to develop the typical F. columnare infections and pathology. On the other hand, groups that were challenged with the bacteria and with either gill or skin scarifications developed severe clinical signs and lesions associated with F. columnare infections. Interestingly, fish challenged without scarifications did not show massive invasion and localization of the bacteria in the gills or skin as was demonstrated by the immunohistochemistry staining study. Cutaneous injury is used for that model because a relationship between handling abrasion and columnaris disease has been demonstrated for catfish (Hussain and Summerfelt 1991; Hawke and Thune 1992). Physical injuries had been historically used to mimic actual handling and netting injuries (Davis 1922 and Fish and Rucker 1943).

The relationship between external body injury and establishing      F. columnare infection was further, supported by the finding that mixed infections with F. columnare and parasites were detected at significantly higher rates (75.76%) than in parasite-free fish (24.24%). These findings clearly prove that skin abrasion or gill damage act as the main porta of entry to fish and is essential to induce the infection with F. columnare in African sharptooth catfish.

Rintamäki Kinnunen et al. (1997) reported that 30% of fish with a parasitic infestation had a simultaneous flavobacterial infection. Parasitic infestations can subject fish to microbial infections in two ways.  Ectoparasites may enhance the invasion of microbes by disrupting skin mucus.  Furthermore, penetrating endoparasites or blood sucking parasites may act as vectors carrying pathogens directly into the tissues of the host (Cusack and Cone 1986 and Ahne 1985). Parasites enhanced bacterial invasion in fish has been reported also in fish farming conditions (Cusack and Cone 1986; Rintamäki-Kinnunen and Valtonen 1997 and Ravichandran et al., 2001). Argulus coregoni was reported to increase the susceptibility of rainbow trout to columnaris disease through the damage caused to fish epidermis that might open a direct entrance site of               F. columnare (Bandilla et al., 2006).

Immunohistochemistry results of the present study clearly indicated that the main target organs for invasion and/or localization of F. columnare in African sharptooth catfish are the gills and skin. Results showed that    F. columnare is present in the interlamellar tissue of primary and secondary lamellae of gills and in the dermis and muscular layer of the skin of fish challenged with either gill or skin scarification. 

Target organs findings were further supported by the results of direct isolation of the bacteria from naturally infected cases, where           F. columnare was isolated from the gills (51.52%) and skin (48.48%) at significantly higher rates than from kidneys (9.09%), and was not isolated at all from the liver and spleen. In addition, clinical signs of challenged were limited to either skin or gills. Clinical signs and mortalities were, however, more severe and rapidly developed in the gill-scarified groups than in the skin-scarified groups. Such findings may be attributed to more stress generated by gill scarification than by skin scarification.

Recent research has demonstrated that F. columnare exhibits a chemotactic response toward mucus of the skin of catfish (LaFrentz and Klesius 2009). Additionally, Staroscik and Nelson (2008) suggest that      F. columnare was able to utilize skin mucus from Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a growth substrate. These findings may, also, explain why the bacteria were isolated at such significantly higher rates from skin than from other internal organs African sharptooth catfish in the present study. 

Immunohistochemistry results of the current study proved that the establishment of F. columnare infection in African sharptooth catfish relies on its ability to adhere onto gill or skin tissues as was previously reported with other species of fish (Decostere et al., 1998 and Decostere et al., 1999). It was suggested that the pathogenicity of F. columnare can be divided into two phases. In the first phase, the affinity and capability to adhere onto fish play a major role in the virulence of the strain. In the second phase, adhered bacterial cells start to divide and produce lyases and proteases, which degrade fish connective tissue establishing visible signs of the disease (Suomalainen, 2005).

Clinical signs observed on African sharptooth catfish either naturally infected or challenged with F. columnare were nearly similar to those previously reported (Post, 1983; Plumb, 1994; Noga, 1996 and Durborow et al., 1998). The commonest symptom is erosion and necrosis of the skin tissue around the dorsal fin, which sometimes even reach the spine and extensive necrosis of the gill tissue (Tripathi et al., 2005). Fins affected usually have necrotic lesions on the outer edges then progress down the fin rays (Post, 1983). Severe osmotic stress that resulted from acute skin loss might be the main cause of mortalities of African sharptooth catfish in the present study. Extensive damage of the skin causes severe loss of osmotic regulation and electrolyte imbalance, which eventually causes death to the fish as was reported byTripathi et al. (2005). One common clinical sign of the disease is the pronounced erosion and necrosis of the gills which is often a major site of damage (Davis, 1922). Generally, all signs observed reflect the lesions found microscopically in the histopathological studies of the present study.

There were extensive necrosis and tissue destruction associated with F. columnare infections in the present study as was demonstrated in the clinical signs as necrosis of gills lamellae and total destruction of the epidermal layer and in histopathological studies as necrosis of the lamellar and interlamellar epithelia. These findings suggest that this bacterium produces strong tissue-destroying enzymes that degrade proteins and connective tissue, and potentially contribute to its ability to cause disease.  One such enzyme, chondroitin AC lyase, is capable of degrading acidic polysaccharides of the extracellular matrix that play a role in several processes including cellular adhesion (Jackson et al., 1991). The production of extracellular proteases is an important virulence mechanism of the bacterium (Song et al., 1988; Bernardet 1989; Griffin 1991; Bertolini and Rohovec 1992; Teska 1993 and Plumb 1999). These proteases have been found to contribute to direct tissue damage and/or invasiveness.

The present study proved that F. columnare produces infections and pathology in African sharptooth catfish. By developing an experimentally challenge model and an immunohistochemical approache, the port of the bacterium entry, how the infections do start, and where the bacteria do localize were investigated and determined. The present study is a corner stone in fully understanding the pathogenesis of F. columnare in African sharptooth catfish; however, further extensive studies are necessary.

 

Acknowledgement:

The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Salah H. Afifi, Dept. Head and professor of fish pathology, and Dr. Khaled H. Zaki, associate professor of anatomy and histology for their generous help in the pathological and Immunohistochemistry studies.

 

References

 

Ahmed, SH.M.; Ahmed, A.I.; El-Kamel, A.A. and Emeish, W.F. (2007):  Columnaris disease in sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus.  Assiut Veterinary Medicine Journal. Volume 53: No. 1.

Ahne, W. (1985): Argulus foliaceus L. and Piscicola geometra L. as mechanical vectors of spring viraemia of carp virus (SVCV). J. Fish Dis. 8: 241-242.

Anacker, R.I. and Ordal, E.J. (1959): Producers for the detection and identification of certain fish pathogens. 3rd Ed. American Fish Society. Oregon, USA.

Anderson, D.P. and Dixon, D.W. (1984): Fish Biologics Guide. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Krarneysville, West Virginia, USA.

Austin, B. and Austin, D.A. (1987): Bacterial Fish Pathogens. Ellis Horwood, West Sussex, England, pp. 225-247.

Bader, J.A.; Nusbaum, K.E. and Shoemaker, C.A. (2003): Comparative challenge model of Flavobacterium columnare using abraded and unabraded channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque). J. Fish Dis. 26: 461-467.

Bandilla, M.; Valtonen, E.T.; Soumalainen, L.R.; Aphalo, P.J. and Hakalahti, T. (2006):A link between ectoparasite infection and susceptibility to bacterial disease in rainbow trout. Int. J.  Parasitol. 36: 987-991.

Becker, C.D. and Fujihara, M.P. (1978): The bacterial pathogen Flexibacter columnaris and its epizootiology among Columbia river fish. A review and synthesis. Monograph no. 2. American Fisheries Society, Washington, DC.

Bernardet, J.F. (1989):Flexibacter columnaris”: first description in France and comparison with bacterial strains form other origins. Dis. Aquat. Org. 6: 37-44.

Bertolini, J.M. and Rohovec, J.S. (1992): Electrophoretic detection of proteases from different Flavobacterium columnare strains and assessment of their variability. Dis. Aquat. Org. 12: 121-128.

Bullock, A.M. (1989): Laboratory methods in fish pathology Roberts, R.J. (ed.): 2nd Ed. Great Britain, pp. 374-402.

Cruickshank, K.R.; Duguid, J.P.; Marmion, B.P. and Swain, R.H. (1975): Tests for identification of bacteria in: Medical microbiology 12th Ed. Vol. II. Churchill Livingstone. Edinburgl, London and New York. pp. 170-189.

Cusack, R. and Cone, D. (1986): A review of parasites as vectors of viral and bacterial diseases of fish. J. Fish Dis. 9: 169-171.

Davis, H.S. (1922): A new bacterial disease of fresh-water fishes. Bulletin of U.S. Bureau of Fisheries 38: 261–280.

Decostere, A.; Haesebrouck, F. and Devriese, L.A. (1998): Characterization of four Flavobacterium columnare (Flexibacter columnaris) strain isolated from tropical fish. Veterinary Microbiology 62 (1): 35-45.

Decostere, A.; Haesebrouck, F.; Van Driessche, E.; Charlier, G. and Ducatelle, R. (1999): Characterization of the adhesion of Flavobacterium columnare (Flexibacter columnaris) to gill tissue. J. Fish Dis. 22: 465-474.

DelCorral, F. (1988): Virulence properties of selected bacterial fish pathogens. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia.

Drury, R.A.B. and Wallington, E.A. (1980): Carleton's Histological Technique, 5thEd.OxfordUniversity Press. New York.

Durborow,  R.; Thune, R.; Hawke, J. and Camus, A.  (1998): Columnaris Disease: A bacterial infection caused by Flavobacterium columnare. SRAC Publication,  No.479.

Elkamel, A.A. and Thune, R.L. (2003): Invasion and Replication of Photobacterium damselae subspecies piscicida in Fish Cell Lines.  J. Aquat. Anim. Health, 15: 167-174.

Ellsaesser, C.F. and Clem, L.W. (1986): Hematological and immunological changes in channel catfish by handing and transport. Journal of Fish Biology. 28: 511-521.

Fish, F.F. and Rucker, R.R. (1943): Columnaris as a disease of coldwater fishes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 73: 32–36.

Garvey, J.S.; Cremer, N.E. and Sussdorf, D.H. (1977): Methods in Immunology: A laboratory text for instruction and research. W. A. Benjamin, INC., Reading, Massachusetts

Griffin, B.R. (1991): Characteristics of a chondrotin AC lyase produced by Cytophaga columnais. Transactions Am. Fish. Sot. 120: 391-395.

Grimes, S.E. (2002): A Basic Laboratory Manual for the Small-Scale Production and testing of I-2 Newcastle disease vaccine. FAO-APHCA, RAP publication, Bangkok10200, Thailand.

Hawke, J.P. and Thune, R.I. (1992): Systemic isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of Cytophaga columnaris from commercially reared channel catfish. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 4:    109-113.

Hussain, M. and Summerfelt, R.C. (1991): The role of mechanical injury in an experimental transmission of Flexibacter columnaris to fingerling walleye. J. IowaAcademy of Science 98: 93-98.

Jackson, R.L.; Busch, S.J. and Cardin, A.D. (1991): Glycosaminoglycans: molecular properties, protein interactions, and role in physiological processes. Physiological Review 71: 481-539.

Kunttu, H.M.T; Suomalainen, L.R.; Jokinen, E.I and Valtonen, E.T. (2009): Flavobacterium columnare colony types: Connection to adhesion and virulence? Microbial Pathogenesis, 46: 21–27.

LaFrentz, B.R. and Klesius, P.H. (2009): Development of a culture independent method to characterize the chemotactic response of Flavobacterium columnare to fish mucus. Journal of Microbiological Methods 77: 37-40.

Nematollahi, A.; Decostere, A.; Pasmans, F.; Ducatelle, R. and Haesebrouck, F. (2003): Adhesion of high and low virulence Flavobacterium psychrophilum strains to isolated gill arches of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Dis. Aquat. Org. 55:      101-107.

Noga, E.J. (1996): Fish Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment. Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri. 156–158.

Pacha, R.E. and Ordal, E.J. (1970): Myxobacterial diseases of salmonids. In: S. F. Snieszko (Eds). A symposium on diseases of fishes and shellfishes. Special Publication No. 5, American Fisheries Society, Washington, DC, PP. 243-257.

Plumb, J.A. (1994): Columnaris disease. In: Health Maintenance of Cultured Fish: Principle Microbial Diseases (ed. by J.A. Plumb), pp. 135-141. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Plumb, J.A. (1999): Health Maintenance and Principal Microbial Diseases of Cultured Fished. IowaStateUniversity Press, Ames, Iowa. 328 pp.

Post, G. (1983): Textbook of Fish Health. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, New Jersey, 256 pp.

Post, G. (1987): Textbook of fish Health. 2nd Ed., 182-185. T.F.H.Publication, Inc. Ltd.

Ravichandran, S.; Ranjit Singh, A.J.A. and Veerappan, N. (2001): Parasite-induced vibriosis in Chirocentrus dorab of Parapingettai coastal waters. Curr. Sci. 80: 622-623.

Rintamäki-Kinnunen, P. and Valtonen, E. (1997): Epizootiology of Protozoans in Farmed Salmonids at Northern latitudes. Int. J. Parasitol. 27: 89-99.

Rintamaki-kinnunen, P.; Bernardet, J.F. and Bloigu, A. (1997): Yellow pigmented filamentous bacteria connected with framed salmonid fish mortality. Aquaculture 149: 1-14.

Shamsudin, M.N. (1994): Pathogenesis of Flexibacter columnaris and immunity in the channel catfish. PhD dissertation. Auburn University, AL, USA.

Shamsudin, M.N. and Plumb, J.A. (1996): Morphological, biochemical and physiological characterization of Flexibacter columnaris isolates from four fish species of fish. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 8: 335-339.

Shotts, E.B. and Starliper, C.E. (1999): Flavobacterial diseases: columnaris disease, cold-water disease and bacterial gill disease. In: Woo, P.T.K., Bruno, D.W. (Eds.), Fish Disease and Disorders. Viral, Bacterial and Fungal Infections, vol. 3. CAB Publishing, New York, pp. 559– 576.

Song, Y.L.; Fryer, J.L. and Rohovec, J.S. (1988): Comparison of six media for the cultivation of Flexibacter columnaris. Fish Pathol. 23:  91-94.

Staroscik, A.M. and Nelson, D.R. (2008): The influence of salmon surface mucus on the growth of Flavobacterium columnare. Journal of Fish Diseases 31: 59-69.

Stoskopf, M.K. (1993): Fish Medicine. Bacterial Diseases of Goldfish, Koi and Carp p.473 W. B. Saunders Co., PhiladelphiaUSA.

Suomalainen, L.R. (2005): Flavobacterium columnare in Finnish fish farming. Characterisation and putative disease management strategies. PhD thesis. University of Jyväskylä. Jyväskylän Yliopisto.

Suomalainen, L.R.; Tiirola, M. and Valtonen, E.T. (2005): Influence of rearing conditions on Flavobacterium columnare infection of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J. Fish Dis. 28: 271-277.

Teska, J.D. (1993): Assay to evaluate the reaction kinetics of chondroitin AC lyase produced by Cytophaga columnaris. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 5: 259-264.

Tripathi, N.K.; Latimer, K.S.; Gregory, C.R.; Ritchie, B.W.; Wooley, R.E. and Walker, R.L. (2005): Development and evaluation of an experimental model of cutaneous columnaris disease in koi Cyprinus carpio. J. Vet. Diagnostic Investigation. 17: 45-54.

 

 

References
 
Ahmed, SH.M.; Ahmed, A.I.; El-Kamel, A.A. and Emeish, W.F. (2007):  Columnaris disease in sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus.  Assiut Veterinary Medicine Journal. Volume 53: No. 1.
Ahne, W. (1985): Argulus foliaceus L. and Piscicola geometra L. as mechanical vectors of spring viraemia of carp virus (SVCV). J. Fish Dis. 8: 241-242.
Anacker, R.I. and Ordal, E.J. (1959): Producers for the detection and identification of certain fish pathogens. 3rd Ed. American Fish Society. Oregon, USA.
Anderson, D.P. and Dixon, D.W. (1984): Fish Biologics Guide. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Krarneysville, West Virginia, USA.
Austin, B. and Austin, D.A. (1987): Bacterial Fish Pathogens. Ellis Horwood, West Sussex, England, pp. 225-247.
Bader, J.A.; Nusbaum, K.E. and Shoemaker, C.A. (2003): Comparative challenge model of Flavobacterium columnare using abraded and unabraded channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque). J. Fish Dis. 26: 461-467.
Bandilla, M.; Valtonen, E.T.; Soumalainen, L.R.; Aphalo, P.J. and Hakalahti, T. (2006):A link between ectoparasite infection and susceptibility to bacterial disease in rainbow trout. Int. J.  Parasitol. 36: 987-991.
Becker, C.D. and Fujihara, M.P. (1978): The bacterial pathogen Flexibacter columnaris and its epizootiology among Columbia river fish. A review and synthesis. Monograph no. 2. American Fisheries Society, Washington, DC.
Bernardet, J.F. (1989):Flexibacter columnaris”: first description in France and comparison with bacterial strains form other origins. Dis. Aquat. Org. 6: 37-44.
Bertolini, J.M. and Rohovec, J.S. (1992): Electrophoretic detection of proteases from different Flavobacterium columnare strains and assessment of their variability. Dis. Aquat. Org. 12: 121-128.
Bullock, A.M. (1989): Laboratory methods in fish pathology Roberts, R.J. (ed.): 2nd Ed. Great Britain, pp. 374-402.
Cruickshank, K.R.; Duguid, J.P.; Marmion, B.P. and Swain, R.H. (1975): Tests for identification of bacteria in: Medical microbiology 12th Ed. Vol. II. Churchill Livingstone. Edinburgl, London and New York. pp. 170-189.
Cusack, R. and Cone, D. (1986): A review of parasites as vectors of viral and bacterial diseases of fish. J. Fish Dis. 9: 169-171.
Davis, H.S. (1922): A new bacterial disease of fresh-water fishes. Bulletin of U.S. Bureau of Fisheries 38: 261–280.
Decostere, A.; Haesebrouck, F. and Devriese, L.A. (1998): Characterization of four Flavobacterium columnare (Flexibacter columnaris) strain isolated from tropical fish. Veterinary Microbiology 62 (1): 35-45.
Decostere, A.; Haesebrouck, F.; Van Driessche, E.; Charlier, G. and Ducatelle, R. (1999): Characterization of the adhesion of Flavobacterium columnare (Flexibacter columnaris) to gill tissue. J. Fish Dis. 22: 465-474.
DelCorral, F. (1988): Virulence properties of selected bacterial fish pathogens. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia.
Drury, R.A.B. and Wallington, E.A. (1980): Carleton's Histological Technique, 5thEd.OxfordUniversity Press. New York.
Durborow,  R.; Thune, R.; Hawke, J. and Camus, A.  (1998): Columnaris Disease: A bacterial infection caused by Flavobacterium columnare. SRAC Publication,  No.479.
Elkamel, A.A. and Thune, R.L. (2003): Invasion and Replication of Photobacterium damselae subspecies piscicida in Fish Cell Lines.  J. Aquat. Anim. Health, 15: 167-174.
Ellsaesser, C.F. and Clem, L.W. (1986): Hematological and immunological changes in channel catfish by handing and transport. Journal of Fish Biology. 28: 511-521.
Fish, F.F. and Rucker, R.R. (1943): Columnaris as a disease of coldwater fishes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 73: 32–36.
Garvey, J.S.; Cremer, N.E. and Sussdorf, D.H. (1977): Methods in Immunology: A laboratory text for instruction and research. W. A. Benjamin, INC., Reading, Massachusetts
Griffin, B.R. (1991): Characteristics of a chondrotin AC lyase produced by Cytophaga columnais. Transactions Am. Fish. Sot. 120: 391-395.
Grimes, S.E. (2002): A Basic Laboratory Manual for the Small-Scale Production and testing of I-2 Newcastle disease vaccine. FAO-APHCA, RAP publication, Bangkok10200, Thailand.
Hawke, J.P. and Thune, R.I. (1992): Systemic isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of Cytophaga columnaris from commercially reared channel catfish. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 4:    109-113.
Hussain, M. and Summerfelt, R.C. (1991): The role of mechanical injury in an experimental transmission of Flexibacter columnaris to fingerling walleye. J. IowaAcademy of Science 98: 93-98.
Jackson, R.L.; Busch, S.J. and Cardin, A.D. (1991): Glycosaminoglycans: molecular properties, protein interactions, and role in physiological processes. Physiological Review 71: 481-539.
Kunttu, H.M.T; Suomalainen, L.R.; Jokinen, E.I and Valtonen, E.T. (2009): Flavobacterium columnare colony types: Connection to adhesion and virulence? Microbial Pathogenesis, 46: 21–27.
LaFrentz, B.R. and Klesius, P.H. (2009): Development of a culture independent method to characterize the chemotactic response of Flavobacterium columnare to fish mucus. Journal of Microbiological Methods 77: 37-40.
Nematollahi, A.; Decostere, A.; Pasmans, F.; Ducatelle, R. and Haesebrouck, F. (2003): Adhesion of high and low virulence Flavobacterium psychrophilum strains to isolated gill arches of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Dis. Aquat. Org. 55:      101-107.
Noga, E.J. (1996): Fish Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment. Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri. 156–158.
Pacha, R.E. and Ordal, E.J. (1970): Myxobacterial diseases of salmonids. In: S. F. Snieszko (Eds). A symposium on diseases of fishes and shellfishes. Special Publication No. 5, American Fisheries Society, Washington, DC, PP. 243-257.
Plumb, J.A. (1994): Columnaris disease. In: Health Maintenance of Cultured Fish: Principle Microbial Diseases (ed. by J.A. Plumb), pp. 135-141. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Plumb, J.A. (1999): Health Maintenance and Principal Microbial Diseases of Cultured Fished. IowaStateUniversity Press, Ames, Iowa. 328 pp.
Post, G. (1983): Textbook of Fish Health. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, New Jersey, 256 pp.
Post, G. (1987): Textbook of fish Health. 2nd Ed., 182-185. T.F.H.Publication, Inc. Ltd.
Ravichandran, S.; Ranjit Singh, A.J.A. and Veerappan, N. (2001): Parasite-induced vibriosis in Chirocentrus dorab of Parapingettai coastal waters. Curr. Sci. 80: 622-623.
Rintamäki-Kinnunen, P. and Valtonen, E. (1997): Epizootiology of Protozoans in Farmed Salmonids at Northern latitudes. Int. J. Parasitol. 27: 89-99.
Rintamaki-kinnunen, P.; Bernardet, J.F. and Bloigu, A. (1997): Yellow pigmented filamentous bacteria connected with framed salmonid fish mortality. Aquaculture 149: 1-14.
Shamsudin, M.N. (1994): Pathogenesis of Flexibacter columnaris and immunity in the channel catfish. PhD dissertation. Auburn University, AL, USA.
Shamsudin, M.N. and Plumb, J.A. (1996): Morphological, biochemical and physiological characterization of Flexibacter columnaris isolates from four fish species of fish. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 8: 335-339.
Shotts, E.B. and Starliper, C.E. (1999): Flavobacterial diseases: columnaris disease, cold-water disease and bacterial gill disease. In: Woo, P.T.K., Bruno, D.W. (Eds.), Fish Disease and Disorders. Viral, Bacterial and Fungal Infections, vol. 3. CAB Publishing, New York, pp. 559– 576.
Song, Y.L.; Fryer, J.L. and Rohovec, J.S. (1988): Comparison of six media for the cultivation of Flexibacter columnaris. Fish Pathol. 23:  91-94.
Staroscik, A.M. and Nelson, D.R. (2008): The influence of salmon surface mucus on the growth of Flavobacterium columnare. Journal of Fish Diseases 31: 59-69.
Stoskopf, M.K. (1993): Fish Medicine. Bacterial Diseases of Goldfish, Koi and Carp p.473 W. B. Saunders Co., PhiladelphiaUSA.
Suomalainen, L.R. (2005): Flavobacterium columnare in Finnish fish farming. Characterisation and putative disease management strategies. PhD thesis. University of Jyväskylä. Jyväskylän Yliopisto.
Suomalainen, L.R.; Tiirola, M. and Valtonen, E.T. (2005): Influence of rearing conditions on Flavobacterium columnare infection of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J. Fish Dis. 28: 271-277.
Teska, J.D. (1993): Assay to evaluate the reaction kinetics of chondroitin AC lyase produced by Cytophaga columnaris. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 5: 259-264.
Tripathi, N.K.; Latimer, K.S.; Gregory, C.R.; Ritchie, B.W.; Wooley, R.E. and Walker, R.L. (2005): Development and evaluation of an experimental model of cutaneous columnaris disease in koi Cyprinus carpio. J. Vet. Diagnostic Investigation. 17: 45-54.