GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS IN EGYPT FROM 2012 TO 2014

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 National Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, P.O. Box 264, Dokki, Giza.

2 National Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on poultry production NLQP, P.O.Box264, Dokki, 12618, Giza, Egypt.

Abstract

The infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is a continuing serious problem facing poultry industry in Egypt.  In this study, 24 bursae samples collected from different broiler flocks (from Giza, Dakahleya, Ismailia, Damietta and Alexanderia) experiencing high mortality rate and bursal lesions during 2012 to 2014 were examined. Clear differences in pathotyping between very virulent Infectious bursal disease (vvIBD) and classical IBD were observed in pathological examination. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was applied for IBD targeting hyper variable region (HVR) of VP2 gene. Genetic analysis revealed that 15 viruses belonged to vvIBD that had amino acids A222, I256, I294 and S299 which are highly conserved among vvIBD starins, while 9 viruses belonged to classical IBDV (similar to vaccine strains). The genotyping of Egyptian vvIBDV indicate progressive evolution compared with previously isolated strains which indicates persistence of vvIBDV in Egyptian poultry environment.

Keywords


GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS IN EGYPT FROM 2012 TO 2014

 

NAGLAA M. HAGAG; MOHAMED A. SOLIMAN; ABDEL SATAR ARAFA; ALI ZANATY; AHMED M. ERFAN and MOHAMED K. HASAN

* National Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on poultry production NLQP, P.O.Box264, Dokki, 12618, Giza, Egypt.

 

Email: naglaavetrose@yahoo.com                                                                    Assiut University web-site: www.aun.edu.eg

 

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

 

Received at: 22/8/2015

 

 

Accepted: 17/9/2015

 

The infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is a continuing serious problem facing poultry industry in Egypt.  In this study, 24 bursae samples collected from different broiler flocks (from Giza, Dakahleya, Ismailia, Damietta and Alexanderia) experiencing high mortality rate and bursal lesions during 2012 to 2014 were examined. Clear differences in pathotyping between very virulent Infectious bursal disease (vvIBD) and classical IBD were observed in pathological examination. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was applied for IBD targeting hyper variable region (HVR) of VP2 gene. Genetic analysis revealed that 15 viruses belonged to vvIBD that had amino acids A222, I256, I294 and S299 which are highly conserved among vvIBD starins, while 9 viruses belonged to classical IBDV (similar to vaccine strains). The genotyping of Egyptian vvIBDV indicate progressive evolution compared with previously isolated strains which indicates persistence of vvIBDV in Egyptian poultry environment.

 

 

Keywords: IBDV; RT-PCR; HVR; VP2 gene; Pathotyping

 

 


INTRODUCTION

 

Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is an acute, highly contagious viral disease of young birds characterized mainly by severe lesions in the bursa of fabricious causing fatal condition and immunosuppression in chickens (Eterradossi et al., 2008).IBD virus belongs to the family Birnaviridae and has non-enveloped capsid. Since the first report in 1989, IBDV has two subtypes; variant and the other is classical subtype that has been subdivided into 3 pathotypes: attenuated, classical virulent, and very virulent (vvIBDV) (Jackwood et al., 2008).The first report of acute infectious bursal disease virus (vvIBDV) was in 1989 (Stuart, 1989). Since that time vvIBDV strains have been reported in many parts of the world (Van den Berg, 2000). In Egypt very virulent were reported since its first introduction in 1989 (El-Batrawi, 1990).Variant IBD strains were also reported in Egyptian flocks (Bekhit, 1998).

 

The pathological variation between classic and vvIBD forms were reported. In Australia, however an outbreak of IBD virus was occurred in 1999, it is currently considered that the classical vIBD viruses in Australia cause few clinical signs with 2.5% mortality in a flock of broiler chickens (Ignjatovic et al., 2004). The vvIBD virus is associated with acute clinical disease and high mortality rates (Van den Berg, 2000; Ingrao et al., 2013). Severe mortalities and massive lymphoid depletion with bursal hemorrhages were the characteristics of the acute form of vvIBD in Australia (Ignjatovic et al., 2001). Clear differentiation in pathotyping was demonstrated between classical vIBD and vvIBDV strains (Ingrao et al., 2013; Sharma et al., 1989).

 

The IBDV genome is divided into segments A and B: segments A (3.4 kb) and B (2.8 kb). The large segment A encodes 4 viral proteins, the two capsid proteins VP2 (48 kDa) and VP3 (32–35 kDa), the viral protease VP4 (24 kDa), and a nonstructural protein VP5 (17–21 kDa). The smaller segment B encodes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase VP1 (90 kDa). Expression/deletion studies have shown VP2 aa positions 206 to 350 to represent a major conformational, neutralizing antigenic domain called hyper variable region (HVR) (Xu et al., 2011), which includes the most variable region important for cell antigenic and pathogenic variation. Most exchanges of amino acid residues in VP2 occur in the four hydrophilic loops of the viral capsid (Coulibaly et al., 2005). These exchanges indicate that selective pressure for the evolution of IBDV is directly focused on the capsid regions that are immediately exposed to the immune system (Durairaj et al., 2011). However, most of commercial broiler chicken flocks were vaccinated against IBD, severe outbreaks were reported in Egypt, caused high mortalities, and have become a priority problem (El-Batrawi, 1990; Bekhit, 1998).RT-PCR has been used to amplify sections of the IBDV genome. The VP2 gene is commonly studied because it encodes for the major protective epitopes, contains determinants for pathogenicity, and is highly variable among strains (Abdel-Alem, et al., 2003; Jackwood andSommer-Wagner, 2006). The HVR (206–350 a.a.) contains the most informative genetic data regarding strain variability, it was chosen for sequence analysis to characterize IBDV strains molecularly, allowing analysis of variations that happen naturally or by attenuation in different strains, leading to changes in antigenicity and/or virulence (Jackwood andSommer-Wagner, 2006; Banda et al., 2003). The quality that defines a vvIBDV strain is primarily the ability to cause high mortality in susceptible chickens. Since in vivo studies are expensive, time consuming and sometimes not possible, genetic characteristics that define vvIBDV phylogenetic group have been explored (Jackwood andSommer-Wagner, 2007; Rudd et al., 2002). The amino acids A222, I256 and I294 were reported to be unique to all known vvIBDV strains (Banda et al., 2004). In addition, the amino acids I242, I256, I294 and S299 were reported to be highly conserved among vvIBDV strains (Rudd et al., 2002). Presently, evidence of circulating variant IBDV strains was isolated from flocks vaccinated using classical IBDV vaccines. This study aims to determine the pathotyping and genetic characterization of 24-suspected IBDV samples collected from Broiler flocks in different governorates from 2012 to 2014 in Egypt using histopathology; RT-PCR and sequence analysis of HVR part of the VP2 gene.

 

MATERIALS and METHODS

 

1. Field samples

Twenty four (24) chicken broiler farms in different Egyptian Governorates showed different mortality rates associated with bursal lesions during 2012 to 2014. Necropsy was conducted for diseased birds.

 

2. Pathological examination

All bursae were kept in 10% neutral buffered formaline for histopathology dehydrated in several grades of alcohol, embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 4µm thickness, then stained by H&E stain.

 

3. Molecular detection by RT-PCR

24 bursae were collected for viral detection by RT-PCR. RNAs were extracted from the Bursal homogenates [one part of each bursa sample disrupting in sterile saline (1:1)] using QiAmp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A set of primers were used for the RT-PCR reaction and for the subsequent sequence analysis using forward and reverse PCR primers for amplification of a 620 bp fragment .

 

Forward primer: [AUS GU: 50-TCA CCG TCC TCA GCTTAC CCA CAT C-30].

 

Reverse primer: [AUS GL: 50-GGA TTT GGG ATC AGCTCG AAG TTG C-30] PCR amplification was performed by using Qiagen One Step Enzyme Mix according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

 

4. Sequence for HVR of VP2 gene

Gel containing DNA band of the expected size (620 bp) was excised and purified with the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer instruction. The purified PCR products were sequenced directly using the ABI PRISM.  Big Dye TM Terminators v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (AppliedBiosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), The products of the sequencing reactions were cleaned-up using Centrisep purification kit Analyzer (Applied Biosystem, CA - USA). The purified products were sequenced directly using the ABI (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and the ABI PRISM 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) The phylogram was drawn using also MEGA 5 software. The alignment of the viruses in the study was done using DNAstar – MegAlign software. Egyptian viruses and other international reference strains from the Genbank and were available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) infectious bursal disease viruses resource (http://www.ncbi). Finally the identity percent and divergence between all viruses was carried out.

 

RESULTS

 

1. Necropsy findings

Necropsy revealed varying degrees of swelling or atrophy. Nine flocks showed 2.5 % mortalities, their bursae were shown no haemorrhages in the mucosa. But other bird carcases from 15 farm flocks suffering of 20% mortalities were noticeably dehydrated, and the musculature showed petechial haemorrhages on the thigh and pectoral muscle. The bursae were swollen to about twice its normal size because of hyperaemia and oedema. Some bursae show obvious haemorrhages in the mucosa. In some cases, a yellowish gelatinous exudate and bursal atrophy were observed.

 

2. Histopathology

Microscopic pictures of the 9 cases revealed the classic picture of IBD lesions which characterized by moderate bursal changes including lymphoid depletion and necrosis involving of the follicles. The bursal epithelium became proliferative, forming a glandular-like structure, but did not show changes beyond the formation of cystic and glandular cavities following proliferation of the cortico-medullary epithelium (Figure 1- a, b and c).

Microscopic pictures of the 16 cases revealed pictures of vvIBD to the bursa of Fabricius which characterized by massive depletion of most of lymphoid follicles associated with inflammatory response. Cystic cavities were developed in the follicular medulla. (Figure 1- d & e)  Most of bursal follicles were completely degenerated and replaced with cell debris and eosinophilic material. Hyperplasia and metaplasic changes of the cortico-medullary epithelium were observed. Areas of hyperaemia and heterophilic infiltration, together with proliferating interfollicular connective tissue and oedema were observed (Figure 1-f). Interfollicular cystic and glandular cavities following proliferation of the cortico-medullary epithelium was observed, Atrophy of the bursa has been associated with some of cases.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1: (a,b) microscopic pictures of classic IBD showing moderate depletion of lymphoid follicles; (c) proliferation of corticomedullary epithelium with cystic cavities; (d) massive depletion of lymphoid follicles replaced with esinophilic depris and heterophils inflammatory cells; (e) areas of hyperemia and edema; (f) proliferation of interfollicular connective tissue. Scale bar (50µm).

 


3. Detection of IBDV by RT-PCR

All 24 bursal samples that collected are positive by RT-PCR using specific primers for hyper variable region of VP2 gene. All RT-PCR positive samples showed specific bands at 620 bp on agarose gel as shown in figure (2).

 

4. Phylogenetic characterization

Sequence analysis of the PCR products revealed 15 (IBD 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24) cases characterized as very virulent and 9 cases were similar to classic attenuated (vaccine) strains of IBDV, (IBD8 and 9) similar to Univac vaccine, (IBD 1,4,5, and 12) similar to sanofi 2512 IM-TW, (IBD 13,14 and15) similar to Bursine Plus as shown in the  following  phylogenetic tree.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2: Gel electrophoresis of RT-PCR showing 620 bp b and of some positive samples

 

 

Figure 3: Phylogenetic tree of deduced amino acid sequences of the 24 IBDV strains and other reference classical, very virulent, variant and vaccine strains of IBDV.

 

 

It was found that all 15 very virulant stains contain P222A, V256I , N279I , L294I, N299S  substitution  mutations and also all very virulent strains under study share the same amino acid substitution mutations (G254 S), (Y220 F)  with Egyptian vvIBDV strains (Giza 2008,Giza 2000) in comparison  with other vvIBDV. The presence of the Ssp I restriction site in ALL vv strains corresponds to the substitution at residue (leucine L 294I isoleucine). Ssp I restriction site on VP2 was previously reported to be characteristic of vvIBDV strains as shown in the next aligment report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 4: Alignment report of IBDV isolates and other Egyptian and representative reference strains.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 5: The similarity between IBDV isolates and other Egyptian and representative reference strains.

 

 

The Similarity between VV strains under study and Giza 2008 was ranged between (95 to 99.4%) and with Giza 2002 ranged between (94.1 to 99.1%) as shown in figure 5.

 

Finally, it was found that Classic strains (IBD8 and 9) (L263 F) similar to Univac vaccine, Classic strains (IBD 1, 4, 5, and 12) similar to sanofi 2512 IM-TW, Classic strains (IBD 13,14 and15) similar to Bursine Plus.

DISCUSSION

 

In this study, we indicate the genetic characterization of IBDV in naturally infected chicken broilers farms in Egypt. The obtained clinical and histopathological results indicate obvious pathotyping for vvIBDV infected bursa other than the classic vIBDV infected cases. High mortality rates, severely depleted bursal follicles, hemorrhages, edema, heterophils infiltration together with proliferating interfollicular connective tissue in bursa are strong evident in pathotyping vvIBD (Ignjatovic et al., 2004). In contrast, mild to moderate lymphoid depletion, absence of hemorrahges, edema or heterophils infiltration are indicants for the classic vIBD (Ingrao et al., 2013; Sharma et al., 1989).

 

The definite identification of IBDV was obtained by RT-PCR which was known to be a sensitive test to detect the IBDV. In this study, 24 field samples were positive by RT-PCR for HVR (206–350 a.a.) that contain the most informative genetic data regarding strain variability. It was chosen for sequence analysis to characterize IBDV strains molecularly, allowing analysis of variations that happen naturally or by attenuation in different strains, leading to changes in antigenicity and/or virulence (Jackwood andSommer-Wagner, 2006; Banda et al., 2003). A comparative alignment and phylogenetic analysis of the hypervariable domain of the VP2 grouped the IBDV local isolates into at least two different pathogenic subgroups, vv strains differed from the previously isolated strains Giza 2008, Giza 2000 by having alanine (A) residue at position 198 instead of aspartic acid (D). The reported mutation in these isolates may be as results of the extensive abuse of IBDV vaccines as well as the heavily use of IBD different vaccination programs.

 

In addition, It was reported that the major Hydrophilic region (peak A 210–225) to be important in the binding of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) and were presumed to be the dominant parts of the neutralizing domain. Therefore, variation in this region is likely to induce significant antigenic variation (Domanska et al., 2004; Eterradossi et al., 1998). In this study,15 very virulent isolates have one amino acid substitution (Y 220 F), This amino acid substitution may affect virus antigenicity change which may has an important role in increasing virulence that may cause disease in the presence of high maternal antibody.

 

Residues present in the VP2 region at position (P222A), (V256I), (N279I), 294I, (N299S) showed to be unique for all vvIBDV strains as compared to classical strains (Jackwood et al., 2008), sequence analysis of 15 vvIBD show that The same amino acids at position 222 A, 256 I, 294 I, 299 except at position 279 D.

 

Amino acids found at positions 253 and 284 were found to be responsible for pathogenicity and are unique to highly virulent IBDVs (Brandt et al., 2001; Islam et al., 2001). It was supposed that they were also involved in cell culture adaptation, where (Q 253 H; A 284 T) are specific amino acids for cell tropism (Van Loon et al., 2002).All studied isolates show (253 Q, 284 A) these results suggested the difficulty of cell culture of these isolated strains. Strains, which have glutamine at, position 253 reported to be high pathogenicity than those with a histidine at position 253. Recently, special attention was given to amino acids at position 253 where histidine or glutamine is found. Because of the intensive vaccination programs performed in the field with live attenuated viruses, there is a possibility that the viruses used mutate and subsequently change their pathogenic potential (Zierenberg et al., 2001). 

 

A specific SspI site on VP2 has previously been identified in all vvIBDV strains (Jackwood et al., 2008).Consequently, this SspI site has been used as a genetic marker to predict a very virulent phenotype that must be confirmed by in vivo studies. However, not all vvIBDV have this marker and some non-vvIBDV strains have been found to contain the SspI marker (Sapats andIgnjatovic, 2002). It is interesting that all vvIBDV isolates under study had this restriction site while it was not observed in vaccine (classic) strain.

 

CONCLUSION

 

The presence of nine viruses of vaccine origin indicate circulation of vaccine viruses in the field and that may be due to improper vaccine application in the field that permit emergence antigenic variants which may attribute to severe post vaccination reaction of intermediate-plus vaccines. The intensive use of vaccination programs performed with live attenuated viruses may lead to the possibility of emergence of mutants and subsequently they constantly change their pathogenic potential and that require review the vaccination programs in Egypt.

 

REFERENCES

 

Abdel-Alem, G.A.; Awaad, M.H.H. and Saif, Y.M. (2003): Characterization of Egyptian field strains of infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis 2003; 47: 1452–7.

Banda, A. and Villegas, P. (2004): Genetic characterization of very virulent infectious bursal disease viruses from Latin America. Avian Diseases 2004; 48, 540–549.

Banda, A.; Villegas, P. and El-Attrache, J. (2003): Molecular characterization of Infectious bursal disease virus from commercial poultry in the United States and Latin America. Avian Diseases 2003; 47(1): 87–95.

Bekhit, A.B. (1998): Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry, isolation of very virulent strains, Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 1998, 11, pp. 475–483.

Brandt, M.; Yao, K.; Liu, M.; Heckert, R.A. and Vakharia, V.N. (2001): Molecular determinants of virulence, cell tropism, and pathogenic phenotype of infectious bursal disease virus. Journal of virology 2001, 75 (24), 11974-82.

Coulibaly, F.; Chevalier, C.; Gutsche, I.; Pous, J.; Navaza, J.; Bressanelli, S.; Delmas, B. and Rey, F.A. (2005): The birnavirus crystal structure reveals structural relationships among icosahedral viruses. Cell 2005, 120 (6), 761-72.

Domanska, K.; Mato, T.; Rivallan, G.; Smietanka, K.; Minta, Z.; de Boisseson, C.; Toquin, D.; Lomniczi, B.; Palya, V. and Eterradossi, N. (2004): Antigenic and genetic diversity of early European isolates of Infectious bursal disease virus prior to the emergence of the very virulent viruses: early European epidemiology of Infectious bursal disease virus revisited? Archives of virology 2004, 149 (3), 465-80.

Durairaj, V.; Sellers, H.S.; Linnemann, E.G.; Icard, A.H. and Mundt, E. (2011): Investigation of the antigenic evolution of field isolates using the reverse genetics system of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), Archives of Virology, 2011, 156, (10), 1717–1728.

El-Batrawi, A.M. (1990): Studies on severe out breaks of infectious bursal disease. The natural and experimental disease, in Proceedings of the 2nd Scientific Conference of the Egyptian Veterinary Poultry Association 1990, pp.   339–252.

Eterradossi, N.; Arnauld, C.; Toquin, D. and Rivallan, G. (1998): Criticalamino acid changes in VP2 variable domain are associated withtypical and atypical antigenicity in very virulent infectious bursaldisease viruses. Archives of virology 1998; 143: 1627–36.

Eterradossi, N. and Saif, Y.M. (2008): Infectious bursal disease, in Diseases of Poultry, [eds Saif, Y. M.; Fadly, A.M.; Glisson, J. R.; McDougald, L. R.; Nolan, L. K. and Swayne, D. E.] Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, Iowa, USA, 12th edition, 2008 Eds., pp. 185–208.

Ignjatovic, J.; Sapats, S. and Gould, G. (2001): Detection of vvIBDV strains and Australian variants in poultry: a report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC publication (2001) No. 01/147, Project No. CSA-2J, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia.

Ignjatovic, J.; Sapats, S.; Reece, R.; Gould, A.; Gould, G.; Selleck, P.; Lowther, S.; Boyle, D. and Westbury, H. (2004): Virus strains from a flock exhibiting unusually high mortality due to infectious bursal disease. Australian veterinary journal2004, 82 (12), 763-8.

Ingrao, F.; Rauw, F.; Lambrecht, B. and van den Berg, T. (2013): Infectious Bursal Disease: a complex host-pathogen interaction. Developmental and comparative immunology2013, 41 (3), 429-38.

Islam, M. R.; Zierenberg, K.; Eterradossi, N.; Toquin, D.; Rivallan, G. and Muller, H. (2001): Molecular and antigenic characterization of Bangladeshi isolates of infectious bursal disease virus demonstrate their similarities with recent European, Asian and African very virulent strains. Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health 2001, 48 (3), 211-21.

Jackwood, D.J. and Sommer-Wagner, S. (2006): Molecular studies on suspect very virulent infectious bursal disease virus genomic RNA samples. Avian Diseases 2006, 49(2): 246-251.

Jackwood, D.J. and Sommer-Wagner, S. (2007): Genetic characteristics of infectious bursal disease viruses from four continents. Virology 2007, 365(2), 369-375.

Jackwood, D.J.; Sreedevi, B.; LeFever, L.J. and Sommer- Wagner, S.E. (2008): Studies on naturally occurring infectious bursal disease viruses suggest that a single amino acid substitution at position 253 in VP2 increases pathogenicity, Virology2008, 377, 1, 110–116.

Rudd, M.F.; Heine, H.G.; Sapats, S.I.; Parede, L. and Ignjatovic, J. (2002): Characterization of an Indonesian very virulent strain of infectious bursal disease virus. Arch. Virol. 2002 147, 1303–1322.

Sapats, S.I. and Ignjatovic, J. (2002): Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the VP2 gene of Australian strains of infectious bursal disease virus. Avian pathology: journal of the W.V.P.A 2002, 31 (6), 559-66.

Sharma, J.M.; Dohms, J.E. and Metz, A.L. (1989): Comparative pathogenesis of serotype 1 and variant serotype 1 isolates of infectious bursal disease virus and their effect on humoral and cellular immune competence of specific-pathogen-free chickens. Avian diseases1989, 33 (1), 112-24.

Stuart, J.C. (1989): Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry. Vet. Rec. 1989,125, 281.

Van den Berg, T.P. (2000): Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: a review. Avian Pathology 2000,29: 175–194.

Van Loon, A.A.; de Haas, N.; Zeyda, I. and Mundt, E. (2002): Alteration of amino acids in VP2 of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus results in tissue culture adaptation and attenuation in chickens. The Journal of general virology 2002, 83 (Pt 1), 121-9.

Xu, X.G.; Tong, D.W.; Wang, Z.S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Z.C.; Zhang, K.; Li, W. and Liu, H.J. (2011): Baculovirus virions displaying infectious bursal disease virus VP2 protein protect chickens against infectious bursal disease virus infection. Avian diseases2011, 55 (2), 223-9.

Zierenberg, K.; Raue, R. and Muller, H. (2001): Rapid identification of ‘‘very virulent’’ strains of infectious bursal disease virus by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction combined with restriction enzyme analysis. Avian Pathology 2001; 30: 55–62.

 

 

 

 

التوصيف الجزيئى لفيروس الجمبورو فى مصر فى الفترة من 2012 إلى 2014

 

نجلاء محمد حجاج, محمد أحمد سليمان, عبد الستار عرفة, على محمود زناتى ،

أحمدمحمدعبدالرحمنعرفان ، محمد خليفة حسان

 

Email: naglaavetrose@yahoo.com       Assiut University web-site: www.aun.edu.eg

 

يعتبر مرض التهاب جراب فابريشيا مشکلة خطيرة مستمرة تواجه صناعة الدواجن فى مصر. وخلال هذه الدراسة تم فحص 24 عينة جراب فابريشيا تم جمعها من مزارع تسمين مختلفة (بالجيزة والدقهلية والاسماعيلية ودمياط والاسکندرية) تعانى من وفيات عالية ومن إصابة فى جراب فابريشيا و ذلک فى الفترة من 2012-2014. ومن خلال الفحص الباثولوجى ظهرت اختلافات واضحة فى التوصيف المرضى بين حالات التهاب جراب فابريشيا الشديد الضراوة والتهاب جراب فابريشيا الکلاسيکى. کما تم إجراء اختبار تفاعل انزيم البلمرة العکسى للفيروس مستهدفا المنطقة الواسعة التغير من جين VP2. وقد أظهر التحليل الجينى أن خمس عشرة عينة کانت شديدة الضراوة وتحتوى على الأحماض الأمينية A222, I256, I294 و S299 و التى تعتبر ثابتة بشکل عالى فى فيروسات التهاب جراب فابريشيا شديدة الضراوة, بينما کانت تسع عينات أخرى تنتمى لفيروسات التهاب جراب فابريشيا الکلاسيکية المشابهة للقاح. وقد أظهر التوصيف الجينى لفيروسات التهاب جراب فابريشيا شديدة الضراوة تطورا تدريجيا بالمقارنة بالعترات التى تم عزلها سابقا والذى يبين استمرار فيروسات التهاب جراب فابريشيا شديدة الضراوة فى بيئة الدواجن المصرية.

 

 

 

 

 
REFERENCES
 
Abdel-Alem, G.A.; Awaad, M.H.H. and Saif, Y.M. (2003): Characterization of Egyptian field strains of infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis 2003; 47: 1452–7.
Banda, A. and Villegas, P. (2004): Genetic characterization of very virulent infectious bursal disease viruses from Latin America. Avian Diseases 2004; 48, 540–549.
Banda, A.; Villegas, P. and El-Attrache, J. (2003): Molecular characterization of Infectious bursal disease virus from commercial poultry in the United States and Latin America. Avian Diseases 2003; 47(1): 87–95.
Bekhit, A.B. (1998): Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry, isolation of very virulent strains, Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 1998, 11, pp. 475–483.
Brandt, M.; Yao, K.; Liu, M.; Heckert, R.A. and Vakharia, V.N. (2001): Molecular determinants of virulence, cell tropism, and pathogenic phenotype of infectious bursal disease virus. Journal of virology 2001, 75 (24), 11974-82.
Coulibaly, F.; Chevalier, C.; Gutsche, I.; Pous, J.; Navaza, J.; Bressanelli, S.; Delmas, B. and Rey, F.A. (2005): The birnavirus crystal structure reveals structural relationships among icosahedral viruses. Cell 2005, 120 (6), 761-72.
Domanska, K.; Mato, T.; Rivallan, G.; Smietanka, K.; Minta, Z.; de Boisseson, C.; Toquin, D.; Lomniczi, B.; Palya, V. and Eterradossi, N. (2004): Antigenic and genetic diversity of early European isolates of Infectious bursal disease virus prior to the emergence of the very virulent viruses: early European epidemiology of Infectious bursal disease virus revisited? Archives of virology 2004, 149 (3), 465-80.
Durairaj, V.; Sellers, H.S.; Linnemann, E.G.; Icard, A.H. and Mundt, E. (2011): Investigation of the antigenic evolution of field isolates using the reverse genetics system of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), Archives of Virology, 2011, 156, (10), 1717–1728.
El-Batrawi, A.M. (1990): Studies on severe out breaks of infectious bursal disease. The natural and experimental disease, in Proceedings of the 2nd Scientific Conference of the Egyptian Veterinary Poultry Association 1990, pp.   339–252.
Eterradossi, N.; Arnauld, C.; Toquin, D. and Rivallan, G. (1998): Criticalamino acid changes in VP2 variable domain are associated withtypical and atypical antigenicity in very virulent infectious bursaldisease viruses. Archives of virology 1998; 143: 1627–36.
Eterradossi, N. and Saif, Y.M. (2008): Infectious bursal disease, in Diseases of Poultry, [eds Saif, Y. M.; Fadly, A.M.; Glisson, J. R.; McDougald, L. R.; Nolan, L. K. and Swayne, D. E.] Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, Iowa, USA, 12th edition, 2008 Eds., pp. 185–208.
Ignjatovic, J.; Sapats, S. and Gould, G. (2001): Detection of vvIBDV strains and Australian variants in poultry: a report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC publication (2001) No. 01/147, Project No. CSA-2J, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia.
Ignjatovic, J.; Sapats, S.; Reece, R.; Gould, A.; Gould, G.; Selleck, P.; Lowther, S.; Boyle, D. and Westbury, H. (2004): Virus strains from a flock exhibiting unusually high mortality due to infectious bursal disease. Australian veterinary journal2004, 82 (12), 763-8.
Ingrao, F.; Rauw, F.; Lambrecht, B. and van den Berg, T. (2013): Infectious Bursal Disease: a complex host-pathogen interaction. Developmental and comparative immunology2013, 41 (3), 429-38.
Islam, M. R.; Zierenberg, K.; Eterradossi, N.; Toquin, D.; Rivallan, G. and Muller, H. (2001): Molecular and antigenic characterization of Bangladeshi isolates of infectious bursal disease virus demonstrate their similarities with recent European, Asian and African very virulent strains. Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health 2001, 48 (3), 211-21.
Jackwood, D.J. and Sommer-Wagner, S. (2006): Molecular studies on suspect very virulent infectious bursal disease virus genomic RNA samples. Avian Diseases 2006, 49(2): 246-251.
Jackwood, D.J. and Sommer-Wagner, S. (2007): Genetic characteristics of infectious bursal disease viruses from four continents. Virology 2007, 365(2), 369-375.
Jackwood, D.J.; Sreedevi, B.; LeFever, L.J. and Sommer- Wagner, S.E. (2008): Studies on naturally occurring infectious bursal disease viruses suggest that a single amino acid substitution at position 253 in VP2 increases pathogenicity, Virology2008, 377, 1, 110–116.
Rudd, M.F.; Heine, H.G.; Sapats, S.I.; Parede, L. and Ignjatovic, J. (2002): Characterization of an Indonesian very virulent strain of infectious bursal disease virus. Arch. Virol. 2002 147, 1303–1322.
Sapats, S.I. and Ignjatovic, J. (2002): Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the VP2 gene of Australian strains of infectious bursal disease virus. Avian pathology: journal of the W.V.P.A 2002, 31 (6), 559-66.
Sharma, J.M.; Dohms, J.E. and Metz, A.L. (1989): Comparative pathogenesis of serotype 1 and variant serotype 1 isolates of infectious bursal disease virus and their effect on humoral and cellular immune competence of specific-pathogen-free chickens. Avian diseases1989, 33 (1), 112-24.
Stuart, J.C. (1989): Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry. Vet. Rec. 1989,125, 281.
Van den Berg, T.P. (2000): Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: a review. Avian Pathology 2000,29: 175–194.
Van Loon, A.A.; de Haas, N.; Zeyda, I. and Mundt, E. (2002): Alteration of amino acids in VP2 of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus results in tissue culture adaptation and attenuation in chickens. The Journal of general virology 2002, 83 (Pt 1), 121-9.
Xu, X.G.; Tong, D.W.; Wang, Z.S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Z.C.; Zhang, K.; Li, W. and Liu, H.J. (2011): Baculovirus virions displaying infectious bursal disease virus VP2 protein protect chickens against infectious bursal disease virus infection. Avian diseases2011, 55 (2), 223-9.
Zierenberg, K.; Raue, R. and Muller, H. (2001): Rapid identification of ‘‘very virulent’’ strains of infectious bursal disease virus by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction combined with restriction enzyme analysis. Avian Pathology 2001; 30: 55–62.