THE EFFECT OF DISEASES ON FOOD CONSUMPTION AND WEIGHT GAIN IN CAPTIVE COMMON BUZZARDS (Buteo buteo)

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Abuja, Nigeria

2 Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Nigeria

Abstract

Disease conditions invariably affect the activities and physiology of common buzzards irrespective of whether they are non-infectious or infectious. The impact of these diseases is further compounded by the stress of captivity in rehabilitation facilities. The aim of the study is to relate weight gain and food consumption to disease conditions in common buzzard. Fifty common buzzards were studied in five batches of 10 birds at a time. The absolute quantity of meat consumed was recorded after taking cognizance of the moisture lost by evaporation. Birds with infectious, non-infectious and those with both non-infectious and infectious diseases on the average consumed 111.9g, 116.6g and 110.3g of food daily, while their weight gain was 18.8%, 12.2% and 17.6% respectively. There were only slight differences in the amount of food consumed and percentage weight gained by the 3 categories of birds.

Keywords


Assiut University web-site: www.aun.edu.eg   

 

THE EFFECT OF DISEASES ON FOOD CONSUMPTION AND WEIGHT GAIN IN CAPTIVE COMMON BUZZARDS (Buteo buteo)

 

OKOLI, C.P.1; AIYEDUN, J.O.2 and OLUDAIRO, O.O.2

1 Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

2 Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

 

Received: 16 December 2015;     Accepted: 27January 2016

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

Disease conditions invariably affect the activities and physiology of common buzzards irrespective of whether they are non-infectious or infectious. The impact of these diseases is further compounded by the stress of captivity in rehabilitation facilities. The aim of the study is to relate weight gain and food consumption to disease conditions in common buzzard. Fifty common buzzards were studied in five batches of 10 birds at a time. The absolute quantity of meat consumed was recorded after taking cognizance of the moisture lost by evaporation. Birds with infectious, non-infectious and those with both non-infectious and infectious diseases on the average consumed 111.9g, 116.6g and 110.3g of food daily, while their weight gain was 18.8%, 12.2% and 17.6% respectively. There were only slight differences in the amount of food consumed and percentage weight gained by the 3 categories of birds.

 

Key words: Captive Common Buzzards, Diseases, Food Consumption, Weight Gain.

 

 


INTRODUCTION

 

Diseases are specific abnormal pathological conditions that affect part or all of an organism which may include a disorder of structure or function culminating in signs and death if not properly treated. Diseases can be infectious, non-infectious, genetic or auto-immune. Diseases are generally known to affect animals in various ways ranging from loss of appetite, loss of weight, reduced libido, infertility, inactivity and evenually death.

 

Captivity is stressful and some of the factors that could lead to stress include excess cold or heat, starvation overcrowding and restraint (Von Faber, 1964). Stress leads to the release of glucagon, adrenaline and non adrenaline in the circulatory system (Freeman, 1976). None domesticated birds suffer from stress as a result of prolonged period of poor managemnet and disease (Cooper, 1985b). Avoidance of extreme temperature, adequate nutrition and prompt attention to diseases are practical ways of controlling stress in animal population. The infectious diseases which the studied buzzards were diagnosed of included ectoparasitism, capillariasis, trichomoniasis and gas gangrene while the non-infectious conditions include laxation, dehydration, broken feather and, bruised beak.

 
   

 

 


Corresponding author: OLUDAIRO, O.O.

E-mail address:  oludairo@hotmail.com

Present address: Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

 

Infestation with feather mites predisposed a free livng eagle to aspergillosis and pseudomonas which ended in fatality (Mumcuoglu et al., 1974). Male parasite toads can influence female mating preference (Houde and Torio, 1992, Hamilton and Zuk, 1982). Bright plumages in birds indicate genetic resistance to parasites (Hamilton and Zuk, 1982). Also Capillaria Contorta of the upper alimentary tract can cause disease of varying severity (Trainer et al., 1968, Cooper, 1985b).

 

Prey items can act as intermidiate hosts. Parasitism is quite high in captive birds of prey, but it can be minimised by good hygiene, avoidance of infested or contaminated food items, routine fecal examination, blood screening, regular and prompt treatment of newly admitted and carrier birds (Cerna and Louckeva, 1977).

 

Only a few birds of prey will take food other than flesh such as the African Harrier Hawk that eats oil palm nuts (Cooper, 1985a, Brown and Amadon, 1988).

 

Nutritioncan play a number of roles in mediating potential for a disease state in both the genesis and the management of several common diseases. Metabolic diseases problemsmay be associated with either deficient or excessive nutrients intake (Elghandour et al., 2013).

 

Nutrition is such an important aspect of rehabilitation efforts for captive wild birds as inadequate food supply in terms of quantity or quality has deliterious effects. Inanition or exhaustion from lack of nutrient can kill free living birds while under-fed birds have the pectoral muscles wasted through tissue catabolism.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

After clinical examination, diagnosis and recording, 50 common buzzards were randomly picked for the investigation. The birds were weighed with electronic weighting scales and put individually in perforated paper boxes measuring 90cm x 75cm x 75cm. The paper boxes were all kept in one large room on top of raised wooden pallets. In the rehabilitation facility, common buzzards were fed with pre-slaughtered frozen bony chicken. The chicken was brought ahead of time, chopped into smaller pieces and allowed to thaw slowly. Clean flat round bottom ceramic bowls 2cm deep with a diameter of 12cm were used in serving the chicken. The ceramic bowls were weighed and recorded. Thereafter a handful of the thawed chicken was put into the bowl and their combined weight recorded to determine the quantity of meat served. The weighed meat was thereafter lowered into the boxes containing individual common buzzards labeled B1-B50.

 

Each bird was kept in one box throughout the study period and the boxes were destroyed at the end of the study as the birds were transferred into bigger rooms. The birds were closely monitored for 24hours till the next morning when the buzzards were carefully picked up wrapped with clean dry cloth, while the leftover meat was gathered and the weight recorded. The underlay glossy paper was changed and the bird put back in the box.

 

The leftover meat were gathered and put in the ceramic bowl and weighed. The weight of the ceramic bowl which has been predetermined was subtracted from the combined weight to determine the quantity of the meat left over. After the measurement of the leftover meat for each bird, the birds were returned and another meat for the day weighed and served. The buzzards were studied in batches of 10 for a period ranging from 30 to 36 days each. The quantity of meat consumed by buzzards for each day was determined by subtracting the quantity of leftover meat from the quantity of meat served the bird the previous day. The birds were served once a day and the records were compiled and kept throughout the study period for an overall average daily consumption to be computed. In the course of the study, the weight of the birds were taken at fairly equal intervals about 5 times each and recorded. The average of the five weights W1 -W5 was used as the average weight of the studied common buzzards.

 

In order to take cognizance of moisture lost by the served meat meals to the atmosphere through evaporation, controls were set up each day of the study. The same quantity of meat served the buzzards each day was put in ceramic bowls of the same capacity and dimension and lowered into the 26th paper box in the same room without any buzzard. The meat in the control bowl was reweighed the next day and recorded. The difference in weight represented the amount of moisture lost to the atmosphere by the meat through evaporation.

 

 

 

RESULTS

 

Table 1: Clinical conditions, average quantity of food consumed daily, initial weight, final weight and weight gain of buzzard (g).

 

BUZZARD

CLINICAL CONDITIONS

Average Daily food (g)

Initial wt.(g)

Final wt.(g)

%/wtgained; w.gain/ initial weight

B1

Ascariasis, Emaciation

97.9

628.4

791.7

26

B2

Capillariasis

96

596

683

14.6

B3

Emaciation, Fracture

113.4

622

822.2

32.2

B4

Capillariasis, Coccidiosis Fracture

106.4

579

698.8

20.7

B5

Capillariasis, Bruised beak, weakness

118.4

 

569.3

 

711

 

24.9

 

B6

 

Capillariasis, Coccidiosis, wound ankylosis

101.5

 

796

 

950.1

 

19.4

B7

 

Capillariasis, Gastroenteritis, Luxation

107.8

 

695

 

908.4

 

30.7

 

B8

Capillariasis

120.5

623.5

855.4

37.2

B9

 

Ascariasis, CapillaraisCoccidiosis, Dehydration

110.6

 

559

 

733.3

 

31.3

 

B10

Emaciation, wound

125

669

821.1

22.7

B11

Weakness, nervousness

130.2

551

656.8

19.2

B12

Gastroenteritis

125.1

601.4

661.4

10

B13

Occulitis, emaciation

114.2

661.4

695.4

5.1

B14

Abdominal tumor

104.2

564

579.7

2.8

B15

Weakness

127.7

689

831

20.6

B16

Bruised beak, Gastronteritis

111.7

633.9

737.2

16.3

B17

Occulitis, Dehydration

122.3

603.5

809

34.1

B18

Dehydration

111.7

591.3

716

21.1

B19

Fracture

118.3

683.9

801.5

17.2

B20

Coccidiosis

1 10.1

753.5

913.2

21.2

B21

Broken feathers, Ectoparasitism

113.1

629

753.5

19.8

B22

Trichomoniasis

119.9

557.4

808

45

B23

Ectoparasitism

127.5

499

637.1

27.7

B24

Ectoparasitism

121.6

565

703

24.4

B25

Ectoparasitism

123.3

654.2

857

31

B26

Emaciation wound

103.3

911

829

-9

B27

Gas Gangrene

87

845

853.5

1

B28

Ascariasis, weakness

101

614.

625.3

1.8

B29

Fracture

119.8

563

578.8

1.9

B30

 

Capillariasis, Coccidiosis, Gastroenteritis

111.7

 

567.4

 

705.3

 

24.3

B31

Sinusitis

104.1

498.4

533.8

7.1

B32

Ascariasis, Nervousness

131.4

619

745.3

20.4

B33

Nervousness, oil taint, poisoning

131,9

713

726.8

1.9

B34

 

Capiliariasis,Ectoparaitism wound, luxation

104.3

565

574

1.6

B35

Emaciation, weakness

112.1

831

857.6

3.2

B36

Coccidiosis, Gastroenteritis. wound, Dehydration

105.8

 

568.8

 

603.5

 

6.1

 

B37

Dehydration

106

673.2

694.7

3.2

B38

Rhinitis sinusitis

94

601.5

638.2

6.1

B39

Ascariasis, Coccidiosis

115.7

550

644.6

17.2

B40

Trichomoniasis, wound

102

669

801.5

19.8

B41

Emaciation

103.3

731.8

688.6

-5.9

B42

Ectoparasitism, Electrocution

105.5

767.5

597

22.2

B43

Weakness, Luxation

124.7

694

884.6

27.5

B44

Coccidiosis, Emaciation

117.6

790.4

939

18.8

B45

Ascariasis. wound, amputation

109.7

568

647

13.9

B46

Weakness, blindness

124.5

695.8

865.6

21.5

B47

Wound,   Weakness

100.6

568

647

13.9

B48

Dehydration

118.1

695.8

865.6

24,4

B49

Ascariasis

128

598.5

666.7

11.4

B50

Capillariasis, weakness

102.8

620

823.4

32.8

AVERAGE

 

112.9

642

942.9

16.3

 

Table 2: Categorization of Captive Common Buzzards into Disease Type, Average Food Consumed Daily and Average Weight Gain.

 

BWNID

Av. Qty. of Food Consumed Daily (g)

Average Weight Gain (%)

B3

113.4

32.2

B11

130.2

19.2

B15

127.6

20.6

B18

111.7

21.1

B19

118.3

17.2

B29

119.8

1.9

B33

131.9

-1.9

B35

112.1

3.2

B37

106

3.2

B41

103.3

-5.9

B42

105.5

22.2

B43

124.7

27.5

B46

124.5

21.5

B48

102.8

32.8

MEAN

116.6

12.2

BWID

 

 

B2

96

14.2

B8

120.5

37.2

B12

125.1

10

B14

104.2

2.8

B20

110.1

21.2

B22

119.1

45

B23

1273.5

27.7

B24

121.6

24.4

B25

123.3

31

B27

87

1

B30

111.7

24.3

B31

104.1

7.1

B38

94

6.1

B39

115.7

17.2

B40

102

19.8

B49

128

11.4

MEAN

111.9

18.8

BWNAID

 

 

B1

97.9

26

B4

106.4

20.7

B5

118.4

24.9

B6

101.5

19.4

B7

107.8

30.7

B9

110.6

31.3

B10

125

22.7

B13

114.2

5.1

B16

111.7

16.3

B17

122.3

34.1

B21

113.1

19.8

B26

103.3

-9

B28

101

1.8

B32

131.4

20.4

B34

104.8

1.6

B36

105.8

6.1

B44

117.6

18.8

B45

109.7

13.9

B47

100.6

13.9

B50

102.8

32.8

MEAN

110.3

17.6

 

KEY:

BWNID  =              Buzzards with non-infectious diseases

BWID                     =              Buzzards with infectious diseases

BWNAID               =              Buzzards with non-infectious diseases and infectious diseases

 

Table 3: Disease Type, Average Quantity of Food Consumed Daily

 

 

Birds with non-infectious diseases

Birds with infectious diseases

Birds with both infectious and non-infectious diseases

No

14

16

20

Average daily food consumption

116.6g

111.9g

110.3g

Average weight gain

12.2%

18.8%

17.6%

 

 

 

Figure 1: Line plot of average food consumed by different birds with different diseases.

 

 

 

 

 

ANOVA: Single Factor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

BWNID

14

1631.8

116.5571

102.9673

 

 

BWID

16

2935.9

183.4938

84634.42

 

 

BWNAID

19

2103.1

110.6895

82.19544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

Df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

53553.73

2

26776.87

0.968091

0.38741

3.199582

Within Groups

1272334

46

27659.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

1325888

48

 

 

 

 

               

P = 0.38741 ˃ 0.05.

 

 

 

Figure 2: Line Plot of Average Weight Gain by different Birds with different Diseases

 

ANOVA: Single Factor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

BWNID

14

170.4

12.17143

257.4284

 

 

BWID

16

300.4

18.775

156.5567

 

 

BWNAID

20

351.3

17.565

135.2719

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

367.6377

2

183.8189

1.045299

0.359616

3.195056

Within Groups

8265.084

47

175.8529

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

8632.722

49

 

 

 

 

                             

 

There were no significant differences in average weight gain for the birds with the three categories of diseases.

 


DISCUSSION

 

Results revealed that buzzards with non-infectious diseases, infectious diseases and those with both infectious and non - infectious diseases, on the average consumed 116.6g, 111.9g and 110.3g of food daily respectively. The group with non-infectious, infectious and those with both non-infectious and infectious diseases had 12.2%, 18.8% and 17.6% weight gain respectively.

 

Buzzards with non-infectious diseases consumed the most quantity of food (111.6g) while those with infectious diseases had the highest weight gain (18.8%). This implies that non-infectious disease conditions did not affect food consumption as much as the infectious diseases. On the other hand, birds with infectious diseases gained weight the most because the birds were treated as the research progressed and recovered birds are likely to have improved appetite and food conversion efficiency. It also means that food consumption does not have a direct correlation with food conversion efficiency and weight gain (Cuthbert et al., 2006).

 

There was no significant difference in the average daily food consumption among the3 groups of birds studied.

 

Despite the different disease conditions, most of the buzzards (98%) gained weight which might have been limited by the presence of these conditions.

 

The duration of disease, severity of disease, management of disease conditions, environmental factors and specie and experimental animal type could be possible reasons for the observed results.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Documented relationships exist between disease, food consumption and weight gain. This study showed no significant difference between food consumption in disease conditions and weight gain in disease conditionsin common buzzards. Further studies could be done to investigate and compare the effect of other factors like experimental animal type and weather.

REFERENCES

 

Brown, L.H. and Amadon, D. (1968): Eagles, Hawks and Falcons of the world. Country life books, Middlesex.

Cerna, Z. and Louckova, M. (1977): Microtus arvalis, the intermediate host of a coccidian from the Kestrel (Falcotinunculus), Vestnik Coskoslovenske Spolecnosti Zoologicke, 41: 1-4.

Cooper, J.E. (1985a): Diagnostic techniques in birds. The veterinary manual, 25: 236-244.

Cooper, J.E. (1985b): Veterinary aspects of captive birds of prey. 2nd edition steadfast press.

Cuthbert, R.; Green, R.E.; Ranade, S.; Saravanan, S.; Pain, D.J.; Prakash, V. and Cunningham, A.A. (2006): Rapid population declines of Egyptian Vulture (Neophronpercnopterus) and Red-headed Vulture (Sarcogypscalvus) in India. Anim. Conserv. 9: 349–354.

Elghandour, M.M.Y.; Vazquez-Chagoya, J.C.; Kholif, A.E.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Mejia-Hernandez, P. and Kholif, A.M. (2013): Relationship between nutrition and animal diseases. In; Feed Nutrients and Animal Health. LAMBERT Academic Publishing. Pp.3-36.

Freeman, B.M. (1976): Stress and the domestic fowl. A physiological re-appraisal. World's Poultry Science Journal, 32: 249-256.

Hamilton, W.B. and Zuk, M. (1982): Heritable true fitness and bright birds. A role for parasites. Science, 218: 384-386.

Houde, A.E.  and Torio, A.J. (1992): Effects of parasitic infection on male colour pattern and female choice in guppies. Behav.  Ecol., 3: 346-351.

Mumcuoglu, Y. and Muller, R. (1974): Parasitische Milben and Wiimerals Todesursacheeines Uhus Bubobubo. Der Ornithologische Beobachter, 7: 289-292.

Tranier, D.O.; Folz, S.D. and Samuel, W.M. (1968): Capilariasis in Gyrafalcon. Condor, 70: 276-277.

Von Faber, H. (1964): Sress and general adaptation syndrome in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal, 20: 175-182.

 

 

Assiut University web-site: www.aun.edu.eg   

 

THE EFFECT OF DISEASES ON FOOD CONSUMPTION AND WEIGHT GAIN IN CAPTIVE COMMON BUZZARDS (Buteo buteo)

 

OKOLI, C.P.1; AIYEDUN, J.O.2 and OLUDAIRO, O.O.2

1 Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

2 Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

 

Received: 16 December 2015;     Accepted: 27January 2016

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

Disease conditions invariably affect the activities and physiology of common buzzards irrespective of whether they are non-infectious or infectious. The impact of these diseases is further compounded by the stress of captivity in rehabilitation facilities. The aim of the study is to relate weight gain and food consumption to disease conditions in common buzzard. Fifty common buzzards were studied in five batches of 10 birds at a time. The absolute quantity of meat consumed was recorded after taking cognizance of the moisture lost by evaporation. Birds with infectious, non-infectious and those with both non-infectious and infectious diseases on the average consumed 111.9g, 116.6g and 110.3g of food daily, while their weight gain was 18.8%, 12.2% and 17.6% respectively. There were only slight differences in the amount of food consumed and percentage weight gained by the 3 categories of birds.

 

Key words: Captive Common Buzzards, Diseases, Food Consumption, Weight Gain.

 

 


INTRODUCTION

 

Diseases are specific abnormal pathological conditions that affect part or all of an organism which may include a disorder of structure or function culminating in signs and death if not properly treated. Diseases can be infectious, non-infectious, genetic or auto-immune. Diseases are generally known to affect animals in various ways ranging from loss of appetite, loss of weight, reduced libido, infertility, inactivity and evenually death.

 

Captivity is stressful and some of the factors that could lead to stress include excess cold or heat, starvation overcrowding and restraint (Von Faber, 1964). Stress leads to the release of glucagon, adrenaline and non adrenaline in the circulatory system (Freeman, 1976). None domesticated birds suffer from stress as a result of prolonged period of poor managemnet and disease (Cooper, 1985b). Avoidance of extreme temperature, adequate nutrition and prompt attention to diseases are practical ways of controlling stress in animal population. The infectious diseases which the studied buzzards were diagnosed of included ectoparasitism, capillariasis, trichomoniasis and gas gangrene while the non-infectious conditions include laxation, dehydration, broken feather and, bruised beak.

 
   

 

 


Corresponding author: OLUDAIRO, O.O.

E-mail address:  oludairo@hotmail.com

Present address: Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

 

Infestation with feather mites predisposed a free livng eagle to aspergillosis and pseudomonas which ended in fatality (Mumcuoglu et al., 1974). Male parasite toads can influence female mating preference (Houde and Torio, 1992, Hamilton and Zuk, 1982). Bright plumages in birds indicate genetic resistance to parasites (Hamilton and Zuk, 1982). Also Capillaria Contorta of the upper alimentary tract can cause disease of varying severity (Trainer et al., 1968, Cooper, 1985b).

 

Prey items can act as intermidiate hosts. Parasitism is quite high in captive birds of prey, but it can be minimised by good hygiene, avoidance of infested or contaminated food items, routine fecal examination, blood screening, regular and prompt treatment of newly admitted and carrier birds (Cerna and Louckeva, 1977).

 

Only a few birds of prey will take food other than flesh such as the African Harrier Hawk that eats oil palm nuts (Cooper, 1985a, Brown and Amadon, 1988).

 

Nutritioncan play a number of roles in mediating potential for a disease state in both the genesis and the management of several common diseases. Metabolic diseases problemsmay be associated with either deficient or excessive nutrients intake (Elghandour et al., 2013).

 

Nutrition is such an important aspect of rehabilitation efforts for captive wild birds as inadequate food supply in terms of quantity or quality has deliterious effects. Inanition or exhaustion from lack of nutrient can kill free living birds while under-fed birds have the pectoral muscles wasted through tissue catabolism.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

After clinical examination, diagnosis and recording, 50 common buzzards were randomly picked for the investigation. The birds were weighed with electronic weighting scales and put individually in perforated paper boxes measuring 90cm x 75cm x 75cm. The paper boxes were all kept in one large room on top of raised wooden pallets. In the rehabilitation facility, common buzzards were fed with pre-slaughtered frozen bony chicken. The chicken was brought ahead of time, chopped into smaller pieces and allowed to thaw slowly. Clean flat round bottom ceramic bowls 2cm deep with a diameter of 12cm were used in serving the chicken. The ceramic bowls were weighed and recorded. Thereafter a handful of the thawed chicken was put into the bowl and their combined weight recorded to determine the quantity of meat served. The weighed meat was thereafter lowered into the boxes containing individual common buzzards labeled B1-B50.

 

Each bird was kept in one box throughout the study period and the boxes were destroyed at the end of the study as the birds were transferred into bigger rooms. The birds were closely monitored for 24hours till the next morning when the buzzards were carefully picked up wrapped with clean dry cloth, while the leftover meat was gathered and the weight recorded. The underlay glossy paper was changed and the bird put back in the box.

 

The leftover meat were gathered and put in the ceramic bowl and weighed. The weight of the ceramic bowl which has been predetermined was subtracted from the combined weight to determine the quantity of the meat left over. After the measurement of the leftover meat for each bird, the birds were returned and another meat for the day weighed and served. The buzzards were studied in batches of 10 for a period ranging from 30 to 36 days each. The quantity of meat consumed by buzzards for each day was determined by subtracting the quantity of leftover meat from the quantity of meat served the bird the previous day. The birds were served once a day and the records were compiled and kept throughout the study period for an overall average daily consumption to be computed. In the course of the study, the weight of the birds were taken at fairly equal intervals about 5 times each and recorded. The average of the five weights W1 -W5 was used as the average weight of the studied common buzzards.

 

In order to take cognizance of moisture lost by the served meat meals to the atmosphere through evaporation, controls were set up each day of the study. The same quantity of meat served the buzzards each day was put in ceramic bowls of the same capacity and dimension and lowered into the 26th paper box in the same room without any buzzard. The meat in the control bowl was reweighed the next day and recorded. The difference in weight represented the amount of moisture lost to the atmosphere by the meat through evaporation.

 

 

 

RESULTS

 

Table 1: Clinical conditions, average quantity of food consumed daily, initial weight, final weight and weight gain of buzzard (g).

 

BUZZARD

CLINICAL CONDITIONS

Average Daily food (g)

Initial wt.(g)

Final wt.(g)

%/wtgained; w.gain/ initial weight

B1

Ascariasis, Emaciation

97.9

628.4

791.7

26

B2

Capillariasis

96

596

683

14.6

B3

Emaciation, Fracture

113.4

622

822.2

32.2

B4

Capillariasis, Coccidiosis Fracture

106.4

579

698.8

20.7

B5

Capillariasis, Bruised beak, weakness

118.4

 

569.3

 

711

 

24.9

 

B6

 

Capillariasis, Coccidiosis, wound ankylosis

101.5

 

796

 

950.1

 

19.4

B7

 

Capillariasis, Gastroenteritis, Luxation

107.8

 

695

 

908.4

 

30.7

 

B8

Capillariasis

120.5

623.5

855.4

37.2

B9

 

Ascariasis, CapillaraisCoccidiosis, Dehydration

110.6

 

559

 

733.3

 

31.3

 

B10

Emaciation, wound

125

669

821.1

22.7

B11

Weakness, nervousness

130.2

551

656.8

19.2

B12

Gastroenteritis

125.1

601.4

661.4

10

B13

Occulitis, emaciation

114.2

661.4

695.4

5.1

B14

Abdominal tumor

104.2

564

579.7

2.8

B15

Weakness

127.7

689

831

20.6

B16

Bruised beak, Gastronteritis

111.7

633.9

737.2

16.3

B17

Occulitis, Dehydration

122.3

603.5

809

34.1

B18

Dehydration

111.7

591.3

716

21.1

B19

Fracture

118.3

683.9

801.5

17.2

B20

Coccidiosis

1 10.1

753.5

913.2

21.2

B21

Broken feathers, Ectoparasitism

113.1

629

753.5

19.8

B22

Trichomoniasis

119.9

557.4

808

45

B23

Ectoparasitism

127.5

499

637.1

27.7

B24

Ectoparasitism

121.6

565

703

24.4

B25

Ectoparasitism

123.3

654.2

857

31

B26

Emaciation wound

103.3

911

829

-9

B27

Gas Gangrene

87

845

853.5

1

B28

Ascariasis, weakness

101

614.

625.3

1.8

B29

Fracture

119.8

563

578.8

1.9

B30

 

Capillariasis, Coccidiosis, Gastroenteritis

111.7

 

567.4

 

705.3

 

24.3

B31

Sinusitis

104.1

498.4

533.8

7.1

B32

Ascariasis, Nervousness

131.4

619

745.3

20.4

B33

Nervousness, oil taint, poisoning

131,9

713

726.8

1.9

B34

 

Capiliariasis,Ectoparaitism wound, luxation

104.3

565

574

1.6

B35

Emaciation, weakness

112.1

831

857.6

3.2

B36

Coccidiosis, Gastroenteritis. wound, Dehydration

105.8

 

568.8

 

603.5

 

6.1

 

B37

Dehydration

106

673.2

694.7

3.2

B38

Rhinitis sinusitis

94

601.5

638.2

6.1

B39

Ascariasis, Coccidiosis

115.7

550

644.6

17.2

B40

Trichomoniasis, wound

102

669

801.5

19.8

B41

Emaciation

103.3

731.8

688.6

-5.9

B42

Ectoparasitism, Electrocution

105.5

767.5

597

22.2

B43

Weakness, Luxation

124.7

694

884.6

27.5

B44

Coccidiosis, Emaciation

117.6

790.4

939

18.8

B45

Ascariasis. wound, amputation

109.7

568

647

13.9

B46

Weakness, blindness

124.5

695.8

865.6

21.5

B47

Wound,   Weakness

100.6

568

647

13.9

B48

Dehydration

118.1

695.8

865.6

24,4

B49

Ascariasis

128

598.5

666.7

11.4

B50

Capillariasis, weakness

102.8

620

823.4

32.8

AVERAGE

 

112.9

642

942.9

16.3

 

Table 2: Categorization of Captive Common Buzzards into Disease Type, Average Food Consumed Daily and Average Weight Gain.

 

BWNID

Av. Qty. of Food Consumed Daily (g)

Average Weight Gain (%)

B3

113.4

32.2

B11

130.2

19.2

B15

127.6

20.6

B18

111.7

21.1

B19

118.3

17.2

B29

119.8

1.9

B33

131.9

-1.9

B35

112.1

3.2

B37

106

3.2

B41

103.3

-5.9

B42

105.5

22.2

B43

124.7

27.5

B46

124.5

21.5

B48

102.8

32.8

MEAN

116.6

12.2

BWID

 

 

B2

96

14.2

B8

120.5

37.2

B12

125.1

10

B14

104.2

2.8

B20

110.1

21.2

B22

119.1

45

B23

1273.5

27.7

B24

121.6

24.4

B25

123.3

31

B27

87

1

B30

111.7

24.3

B31

104.1

7.1

B38

94

6.1

B39

115.7

17.2

B40

102

19.8

B49

128

11.4

MEAN

111.9

18.8

BWNAID

 

 

B1

97.9

26

B4

106.4

20.7

B5

118.4

24.9

B6

101.5

19.4

B7

107.8

30.7

B9

110.6

31.3

B10

125

22.7

B13

114.2

5.1

B16

111.7

16.3

B17

122.3

34.1

B21

113.1

19.8

B26

103.3

-9

B28

101

1.8

B32

131.4

20.4

B34

104.8

1.6

B36

105.8

6.1

B44

117.6

18.8

B45

109.7

13.9

B47

100.6

13.9

B50

102.8

32.8

MEAN

110.3

17.6

 

KEY:

BWNID  =              Buzzards with non-infectious diseases

BWID                     =              Buzzards with infectious diseases

BWNAID               =              Buzzards with non-infectious diseases and infectious diseases

 

Table 3: Disease Type, Average Quantity of Food Consumed Daily

 

 

Birds with non-infectious diseases

Birds with infectious diseases

Birds with both infectious and non-infectious diseases

No

14

16

20

Average daily food consumption

116.6g

111.9g

110.3g

Average weight gain

12.2%

18.8%

17.6%

 

 

 

Figure 1: Line plot of average food consumed by different birds with different diseases.

 

 

 

 

 

ANOVA: Single Factor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

BWNID

14

1631.8

116.5571

102.9673

 

 

BWID

16

2935.9

183.4938

84634.42

 

 

BWNAID

19

2103.1

110.6895

82.19544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

Df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

53553.73

2

26776.87

0.968091

0.38741

3.199582

Within Groups

1272334

46

27659.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

1325888

48

 

 

 

 

               

P = 0.38741 ˃ 0.05.

 

 

 

Figure 2: Line Plot of Average Weight Gain by different Birds with different Diseases

 

ANOVA: Single Factor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

BWNID

14

170.4

12.17143

257.4284

 

 

BWID

16

300.4

18.775

156.5567

 

 

BWNAID

20

351.3

17.565

135.2719

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

367.6377

2

183.8189

1.045299

0.359616

3.195056

Within Groups

8265.084

47

175.8529

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

8632.722

49

 

 

 

 

                             

 

There were no significant differences in average weight gain for the birds with the three categories of diseases.

 


DISCUSSION

 

Results revealed that buzzards with non-infectious diseases, infectious diseases and those with both infectious and non - infectious diseases, on the average consumed 116.6g, 111.9g and 110.3g of food daily respectively. The group with non-infectious, infectious and those with both non-infectious and infectious diseases had 12.2%, 18.8% and 17.6% weight gain respectively.

 

Buzzards with non-infectious diseases consumed the most quantity of food (111.6g) while those with infectious diseases had the highest weight gain (18.8%). This implies that non-infectious disease conditions did not affect food consumption as much as the infectious diseases. On the other hand, birds with infectious diseases gained weight the most because the birds were treated as the research progressed and recovered birds are likely to have improved appetite and food conversion efficiency. It also means that food consumption does not have a direct correlation with food conversion efficiency and weight gain (Cuthbert et al., 2006).

 

There was no significant difference in the average daily food consumption among the3 groups of birds studied.

 

Despite the different disease conditions, most of the buzzards (98%) gained weight which might have been limited by the presence of these conditions.

 

The duration of disease, severity of disease, management of disease conditions, environmental factors and specie and experimental animal type could be possible reasons for the observed results.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Documented relationships exist between disease, food consumption and weight gain. This study showed no significant difference between food consumption in disease conditions and weight gain in disease conditionsin common buzzards. Further studies could be done to investigate and compare the effect of other factors like experimental animal type and weather.

REFERENCES

 

Brown, L.H. and Amadon, D. (1968): Eagles, Hawks and Falcons of the world. Country life books, Middlesex.

Cerna, Z. and Louckova, M. (1977): Microtus arvalis, the intermediate host of a coccidian from the Kestrel (Falcotinunculus), Vestnik Coskoslovenske Spolecnosti Zoologicke, 41: 1-4.

Cooper, J.E. (1985a): Diagnostic techniques in birds. The veterinary manual, 25: 236-244.

Cooper, J.E. (1985b): Veterinary aspects of captive birds of prey. 2nd edition steadfast press.

Cuthbert, R.; Green, R.E.; Ranade, S.; Saravanan, S.; Pain, D.J.; Prakash, V. and Cunningham, A.A. (2006): Rapid population declines of Egyptian Vulture (Neophronpercnopterus) and Red-headed Vulture (Sarcogypscalvus) in India. Anim. Conserv. 9: 349–354.

Elghandour, M.M.Y.; Vazquez-Chagoya, J.C.; Kholif, A.E.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Mejia-Hernandez, P. and Kholif, A.M. (2013): Relationship between nutrition and animal diseases. In; Feed Nutrients and Animal Health. LAMBERT Academic Publishing. Pp.3-36.

Freeman, B.M. (1976): Stress and the domestic fowl. A physiological re-appraisal. World's Poultry Science Journal, 32: 249-256.

Hamilton, W.B. and Zuk, M. (1982): Heritable true fitness and bright birds. A role for parasites. Science, 218: 384-386.

Houde, A.E.  and Torio, A.J. (1992): Effects of parasitic infection on male colour pattern and female choice in guppies. Behav.  Ecol., 3: 346-351.

Mumcuoglu, Y. and Muller, R. (1974): Parasitische Milben and Wiimerals Todesursacheeines Uhus Bubobubo. Der Ornithologische Beobachter, 7: 289-292.

Tranier, D.O.; Folz, S.D. and Samuel, W.M. (1968): Capilariasis in Gyrafalcon. Condor, 70: 276-277.

Von Faber, H. (1964): Sress and general adaptation syndrome in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal, 20: 175-182.

 

 

REFERENCES
 
Brown, L.H. and Amadon, D. (1968): Eagles, Hawks and Falcons of the world. Country life books, Middlesex.
Cerna, Z. and Louckova, M. (1977): Microtus arvalis, the intermediate host of a coccidian from the Kestrel (Falcotinunculus), Vestnik Coskoslovenske Spolecnosti Zoologicke, 41: 1-4.
Cooper, J.E. (1985a): Diagnostic techniques in birds. The veterinary manual, 25: 236-244.
Cooper, J.E. (1985b): Veterinary aspects of captive birds of prey. 2nd edition steadfast press.
Cuthbert, R.; Green, R.E.; Ranade, S.; Saravanan, S.; Pain, D.J.; Prakash, V. and Cunningham, A.A. (2006): Rapid population declines of Egyptian Vulture (Neophronpercnopterus) and Red-headed Vulture (Sarcogypscalvus) in India. Anim. Conserv. 9: 349–354.
Elghandour, M.M.Y.; Vazquez-Chagoya, J.C.; Kholif, A.E.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Mejia-Hernandez, P. and Kholif, A.M. (2013): Relationship between nutrition and animal diseases. In; Feed Nutrients and Animal Health. LAMBERT Academic Publishing. Pp.3-36.
Freeman, B.M. (1976): Stress and the domestic fowl. A physiological re-appraisal. World's Poultry Science Journal, 32: 249-256.
Hamilton, W.B. and Zuk, M. (1982): Heritable true fitness and bright birds. A role for parasites. Science, 218: 384-386.
Houde, A.E.  and Torio, A.J. (1992): Effects of parasitic infection on male colour pattern and female choice in guppies. Behav.  Ecol., 3: 346-351.
Mumcuoglu, Y. and Muller, R. (1974): Parasitische Milben and Wiimerals Todesursacheeines Uhus Bubobubo. Der Ornithologische Beobachter, 7: 289-292.
Tranier, D.O.; Folz, S.D. and Samuel, W.M. (1968): Capilariasis in Gyrafalcon. Condor, 70: 276-277.
Von Faber, H. (1964): Sress and general adaptation syndrome in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal, 20: 175-182.