CLINICAL, PARASITOLOGICAL, SEROLOGICAL, AND MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS OF TRYPANOSOMIASIS IN CAMELS (CAMELUS DROMEDARIUS)

Abstract

Trypanosomiasis the most prevalent disease of camels, this study was carried out 106 one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius)in Aswan. indicated 18 camels suffered from clinical signs of Trypanosomiasis as weakness, rough coat, Pale mucous membrane and anemia, Emaciation and thinning of the hump and prominent ribs, fever, watery eye, and Diarrhea, and by Microscopic examination Trypanosoma showed in 7 stained blood film of camels (6.6%), out from 106 serum samples were 13 (12.26%) camels give positive results by Formol Gel Test including only one sample positive by blood film test. When using PCR test only 15 camels of them were tested and (13) 86.7 % of them were found to be positive for the presence of TBR genome. When tested by Rhode Trypanozoon antigenic type (RoTat1.2) PCR targets all the 15 samples were negative that may be due to the Trypanosomes may be Trypanosoma evansi type B (lacks of RoTat genome) which may newly introduced to Egypt or may the sequence assorted variety of the RoTat1.2 gene in trypanosoma in Egypt detected from camels, especially in relationship with parasite long perseverance in camels because of the chronic period of the disease. Therefore, TBR-PCR was the more specific and sensitive method of the all methods used during this study. The suspected camel showed significant decreases in total erythrocytes count (TEC), hemoglobin (Hb), and a non significant increase in total leucocyte count (TLC), There was a significant increase in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Total protein, globulin show a significant increase while glucose, Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) level didn’t differ significantly.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Assiut University web-site: www.aun.edu.eg

 

CLINICAL, PARASITOLOGICAL, SEROLOGICAL, AND MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS OF TRYPANOSOMIASIS IN CAMELS (CAMELUS DROMEDARIUS)

 

ADEL E.A.M.; ALSAGHER O.A.A.; HASSAN Y.A.H.M. and MONA A.S.A.

Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley

 University, Qena City, Qena 83523, Egypt, 2018

 

Received: 26 December 2018;     Accepted: 31 January 2019

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

Trypanosomiasis the most prevalent disease of camels, this study was carried out 106 one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius)in Aswan. indicated 18 camels suffered from clinical signs of Trypanosomiasis as weakness, rough coat, Pale mucous membrane and anemia, Emaciation and thinning of the hump and prominent ribs, fever, watery eye, and Diarrhea, and by Microscopic examination Trypanosoma showed in 7 stained blood film of camels (6.6%), out from 106 serum samples were 13 (12.26%) camels give positive results by Formol Gel Test including only one sample positive by blood film test. When using PCR test only 15 camels of them were tested and (13) 86.7 % of them were found to be positive for the presence of TBR genome. When tested by Rhode Trypanozoon antigenic type (RoTat1.2) PCR targets all the 15 samples were negative that may be due to the Trypanosomes may be Trypanosoma evansi type B (lacks of RoTat genome) which may newly introduced to Egypt or may the sequence assorted variety of the RoTat1.2 gene in trypanosoma in Egypt detected from camels, especially in relationship with parasite long perseverance in camels because of the chronic period of the disease. Therefore, TBR-PCR was the more specific and sensitive method of the all methods used during this study. The suspected camel showed significant decreases in total erythrocytes count (TEC), hemoglobin (Hb), and a non significant increase in total leucocyte count (TLC), There was a significant increase in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Total protein, globulin show a significant increase while glucose, Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) level didn’t differ significantly.

 

Key words: Trypanosomiasis – Trypanosoma evansi - clinical examination - microscopic examination - formol gel test - PCR – TBR1.2 - RoTat1.2 - hematological and biochemical findings - camels (Camelus dromedarius).

 

 


INTRODUCTION

 

Historically, at 1880 in India was the first detection of Trypanosoma evansi in blood of camels and horses by Evans, (Leadbeater et al., 2000). The Trypanosomiasis distributed throughout tropical and subtropical regions of the world. In Africa, camels were the most vital host, while in Central and South America the steed was primarily influenced. In Asia, a much more extensive scope of the hosts, including dairy cattle, wild ox and pigs. And the incubation period of surra varies from 5 - 60 days and may extend to 3 months and the parasite appears in the blood before the 14thday of infection. (Eyob et al., 2013).The Salivated trypanosomes were passed to   the   recipient   in  the  saliva  of  the   tsetse   fly

 

 

 


Corresponding author: MONA A.S.A.

E-mail address: monaazab2006@yahoo.com

Present address: Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley University, Qena City, Qena 83523, Egypt, 2018

 

(Glossina spp.). (Ianet al., 2004), and transmitted mechanically by biting insects, (Desquesnes et al., 2013). Clinically camels manifested by fever, anorexia, edema and die; the chronic form was characterized by severe emaciation, intermittent fever, marked generalized muscular atrophy, pale mucous membranes and occasionally abdominal edema, and Sweat odor of urinary ketone, (Higgin, 1983). Anemia appears to be a major component of the pathology of Surra disease, and its continuation initiate anoxic conditions (Enwezor and Sackey, 2005).

 

The diagnosis of camel Trypanosomiasis still unsatisfactory up to date, because of the non-pathognomonic signs, (Dargantes et al., 2005). The routine microscopic examination requires sensitivity, and serological examination requires specificity or sensitivity, and the use the molecular detection PCR test is a more trusted technique for diagnosis and epidemiological studies, (Gonzales et al., 2007).

Various techniques have been utilized to identify non-particular humoral antibodies present in animals infected with trypanosomiasis. Like formol-gel, mercuric chloride precipitation test, and thymol turbidity test, and are thought to be old technique despite the fact that the formol-test may even now have some utilization in the field since it is easy to proceed. most tests rely on the high amount of serum globulins after taking the infection. (OIE, 2012).

 

RoTat 1.2 VSG "variable surface glycoprotein" is available in all T. evansi however not in      T. brucei (Claes et al., 2004). T. evansi are contained homogeneous DNA mini-circles, and they loss a part of the kDNA maxi-circles which described as T. evansi type B and a special primers to give positive results by the molecular detection, and all the results assures the presence of T. evansi type B isolates, T. brucei, and T. evansi type A without RoTat 1.2 gene in Kenyan isolates. (Njiru et al., 2006).

 

The clinical and non-clinical cases were positive by the DNA genome (TBR) while the clinical cases only detected by ITS and RoTat primers. (Elhaig et al., 2013).

 

Determination of the hematological and biochemical changes, (Hb %), PCV and RBCs count were significantly decreased, TLC, lymphocytes, and Monocytes demonstrated a significant increase. (Hilali et al., 2006), and Hematological analysis revealed a significant decrease the TEC, Hb% and PCV, However, the TLC and differential Leucocytes did not differ except for Eosinophils value which was significantly increased in Trypanosoma infected camels.  (Eljalii et al., 2015).

 

Liver function tests uncovered a significant increase in the action of lactate dehydrogenase catalyst (LDH), globulin, total bilirubin, and indirect bilirubin while alkaline phosphatase enzyme (ALP) indicated a significant decrease. Kidney function tests showed a marked decrease of both creatinine and urea. (Hilali et al., 2006). The Plasma total protein, albumin, globulin, cholesterol and urea concentrations were insignificantly decreased. (Omer et al., 2007). This study aimed to Investigate Trypanosoma evansi affecting camels in early stages, to estimate the haemato-biochemical values of camels infested and suspected with Trypanosomiasis, and also to evaluate a simple PCR-based technique for field diagnosis of Trypanosoma infection in camels, at Aswan governorate.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

1.  Animals and samples:

A total number of (106) one humped camels (Camelus dromedarius) from 4 localities in Aswan (Daraw, Aswan west Village, Sohil west Village, and Abu elreish village.) was carried outFrom January 2017 to December 2017.

 

 


 

Table 1: Showing number of examined camels in each area.

 

Total animals

Abu elreish

Sohil west

Aswan west

Daraw

   Locations

 

Animals

She- camel

male

She- camel

Male

She- camel

Male

She- camel

Male

106

5

8

1

7

5

9

2

69

NO.

 

 

Camels in Daraw imported from Sudan and these animals not resident and sold, While camels in Aswan west village, Sohil west village, and Abu elreish village were resident and used to ride tourists, camels in villages grazing with other animals like sheep and goat.

 

 Age of the examined camels were 5 to 8 years old except 7 camels were 3 years old.

 

Whole blood samples of camels were collected by puncturing jugular vein into 2ml Ethylene Diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) coated vacutainers tubes. Then kept in a cooler box and transported for lab activities. And another one in plain test tube to obtain serum.

 

METHODES

 

Clinical examination:

 

Camels were subjected to clinical examination according to the methods described by (Higgin, 1983).

 

Microscopic examination of blood smears:

It was carried out according to (Ijaz et al., 1998)

 

Formol gel test:

The formol gel test (FGT) was carried according to. (OIE, 2012) by adding two drops of concentrated formalin solution (37 % formaldehyde) to 1 ml of serum

 

Molecular diagnosis: (PCR TEST)

The test carried out at the ARRI (animal reproduction research Institute) bio- technology unit.

 

All chemicals and reagents were molecular biology grade and reagents were prepared according to (Sambrook and Russell, 2001). Finally, the DNA amplification carried out according to (Sarataphan et al., 2007). (Masiga et al., 1992) (Konnai et al., 2009), (Salim et al., 2011).

 

Heamatological and biochemical parameters:

Total Erythrocyte Count (TEC) and Total Leukocyte Count (TLC) by Neubauer’s haemocytometer and differential leucocytic count two blood smears were taken from each blood sample and stained with Giemsa (Bancroft et al., 1996). Whereas the concentrations of serum total protein (Biuret Method) and hemoglobin concentration (Hb), albumin concentrations, ALT, AST by using commercial test kits (spectrum-diagnostic) and spectrophotometer according to (Brit, 1967), (Kaplan et al., 1983), (IFCC, 1986), (ECCLS, 1989), (Tietz, 1990), (Young, 1990), (Tietz     et al., 1994), (Young, 1995), (Tietz et al., 1995),  (Burtis, 1999), (Young, 2001).

 

Statistical Analysis

The Significance of the results was evaluated using Analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) computer programs (2002).

 

RESULTS

 

Examination of 106 camels in this study revealed 88 (83 %) camels were apparently healthy, and 18 (17%) camels showed clinical abnormalities, loss of condition, weakness, depression, and a rough coat., pale mucous membrane and anemia, emaciation and thinning of the hump and prominent ribs, some cases show a rise in body temperature and watery eye, diarrhea with the hindquarters soiled with feces. As in photo (1).

 

By microscopic examination founded 7 (6.6%) positive Smears 6 of them were from the 18 clinically suspected camels and one from the 88 apparently healthy camels as in photo (2).

 

By using FGT result revealed 13 (12.26%) serum sample give positive result by Formol gel test, 2 serum samples were positive from the 18 clinically manifested camels and the 11 serum samples from the 88 apparently healthy camels. And there was only one sample give positive result by both microscopic examination and Formol gel test.


 


 

Table 2: Comparative evaluation of the techniques used for diagnosis of Trypanosoma during different seasons.

 

Season

Summer

Autumn

Winter

Spring

Total

No. of examined animals

22

35

20

29

106

Clinical examination

(suspected)

2 (1.9%)

6 (5.6%)

3 (2.8%)

7 (6.6 %)

18

(17%)

Microscopic examination

(positive)

1 (0.9%)

4 (3.8%)

0

2(1.9%)

7

(6.6%)

Formol gel test

(positive)

1 (0.9%)

6 (5.6%)

2 (1.9%)

4 (3.8%)

13

(12.26%)

 

 

15 samples includes (5 positive samples by microscopic examination including the only one positive sample by both microscopic examination and formol gel test and 10 samples were negative by microscopic examination and 4 of them were positive by formol gel test,), examined for PCR total genomic DNA of camels blood samples were amplified using TBR1, and RoTat1.2 primers. A DNA fragment of 164 bp., and 151 bp. was amplified. The TBR-PCR revealed that 13 (86.7%) samples were positive for infection photo (3). All samples which were positive to T. evansi infection by blood film (5 samples including the positive sample by FGT) were positive by PCR while the remaining positives by PCR (8 samples) were negative by blood film, and 2 samples of them were positive by FGT While Amplification of the RoTat 1.2 primer (in the same 15 samples) was carried out. The results revealed all samples were negative (0 %) photo (4).


 


Table 3: Comparative evaluation of the techniques used for diagnosis of Trypanosoma.

 

Negative

Rate

positive

No. of examined camels

Test

88

17%

18

106

Clinical examination

99

6.6%

7

106

Microscopical examination

93

12.26%

13

106

Formol gel test

2

86.6%

13

15

TBR-PCR

15

0%

0

15

RoTat-PCR

 

 

43 samples (including the 5 positive samples by blood film) were subjected to the determination of TEC, TLC, Leuckocytic count, and Hb%. The data of the mean standard error of the mean for TEC, TLC differential leuckocytic count and Hb % in suspected and healthy camels with Trypanosoma evansi in the table (4), revealed that decrease in Hb%, TEC, and increase in TLC, Neutrophils and Eosinophils.


 

Table 4: Heamatological parameters in suspected camels.

 

Basophiles

Eosinophils

Monocytes

Neutrophils

Lymphocyte

TLC

(c.m.m)

Hb%

(gm%)

       TEC

(c.m.m)

Statics /

Parameter

Apparently Healthy

 

suspected

Apparently Healthy

 

 

suspected

Apparently Healthy

 

suspected

 

Apparently Healthy

 

suspected

Apparently Healthy

 

suspected

Apparently Healthy

 

suspected.

Apparently Healthy

 

suspected

Apparently

  Healthy

     37

     Suspected

6

 

 

No.

0

0

0

2

6

14

36

45

10

16

4

5.8

8.8

7.8

   3.9

4

Min.

2

0

12

4

26

20

74

68

40

34

22

25

15.7

11

 12.07

6.7

Max.

0.46

0

3.27

2.5

16.73

16.66

55.68

57

23.86

24

12

14.66

11.77

9.26

  6.93

5.36

Mean

0.69

0

2.34

0.83

4.7

2.07

10.63

10

7.72

8.19

4.72

6.28

1.75

1.2

  2.05

0.95

SD

0.11

0

0.38

0.34

0.77

0.84

1.75

4.09

1.27

3.35

0.78

2.57

0.29

0.49

  0.34

0.38

SEM

 


Biochemical findings: The same 43 samples were subjected to the determination of serum proteins components (μg/dl) and liver enzymes (AST, ALT) and blood glucose level. The data of the mean ± standard error of the mean for serum proteins components (μg/dl) and liver enzymes (AST, ALT) and blood glucose in healthy and suspected camels with Trypanosoma evansi in the table (5), the result revealed a decrease in blood glucose level, AST and increase in ALT level, total protein, albumin, and globulin amounts.

 

 


 

Table 5: Biochemical parameters in suspected camels.

 

Albumin/

globulin ratio

Globulin

Albumin

Total protein (g/dl)

 

AST

(u/l)

ALT

(u/l)

Glucose

(mg/dl)

   Statics /  

   Parameter

 

No.

Apparently Healthy

37

Suspected

 

6

Apparently Healthy

37

Suspected

 

6

Apparently Healthy

37

Suspected

 

6

Apparently Healthy

37

Suspected

 

6

Apparently Healthy

37

Suspected

 

6

Apparently Healthy

37

Suspected

 

6

Apparently Healthy

37

Suspected

 

6

0.029

0.29

1.8

4.96

0.2

1.8

3

7.3

9.43

7.6

0.58

8.5

81

58

Min.

0.94

0.79

6.9

6.29

3.2

4.24

8

9.3

370

44.2

49.8

57.1

149

149

Max.

0.35

0.48

4.81

5.58

1.56

2.61

6.33

8.2

86.15

31.23

12.09

37.08

117

107

Mean

0.21

0.18

0.91

0.54

0.7

0.89

0.92

0.83

83.11

14

12.34

16.22

15.17

29.18

SD

0.03

0.075

0.15

0.22

0.11

0.37

0.15

0.34

13.85

5.7

2.05

6.62

2.52

11.91

SEM

 


 

Photo 1: Trypanosoma evansi by microscopic examination.

 

 

Photo 2: Animal clinically suffering from trypanosomiasis.

 

 

 

Photo 3: TBR- PCR results: Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplified T. evansi DNA (164 bp PCR products). M: 100 bp DNA ladder as a standard marker, Lane (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15) Positive PCR products. Lane (8, and 9) Negative PCR products .

 

 

Photo 4: RoTat 1.2-PCR results: Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplified T. evansi DNA (151 bp PCR products). M: 100 bp DNA ladder as a standard marker, all samples were negative (giving several non- specific bands) including the 5 positive samples with microscopical examination and all the TBR primer positive samples.

 


DISCUSSION

 

These clinical signs were similar to those described by (Higgin, 1983).

 

Microscopic examination of stained blood smear revealed that the total infected camels was 7 (6.6%) similar to (Abd-Elmaleck et al., 2014), differ to (Mahmoud M., 2008), It is important to mention that because of microscopic low prevalence (6.6%), detection of Trypanosoma evansi in the blood of examined animal is suitable only in acute infection where the number of trypanosomes in blood is very high (parasitaemia). On the other hand in chronic infection trypanosomes in blood are scanty or completely absent, so the microscopic examination is not successful at this stage due to the result revealed that TBR-PCR high prevalence (86.6%) similar opinion was mentioned by (Chaudhary et al., 2010, and Shahzad et al., 2010).

 

All the microscopic confirmed camels samples were negative (except one were positive) in the Formol Gel Test, this serological test showed poor to slight accordance with any other diagnostic test for surra applied in the present study. Similar to (Chappuis, 2005), (Aslam     et al., 2010). The apparently poor specificity of the FGT is explained by the fact that it detects, in a non-specific way, high concentrations of plasma immunoglobulins that can be due to any acute or chronic infection causing hyper gammaglobulinemia. (Tehseen et al., 2015).

 

The highest infection rate of Trypanosoma in the study area were in spring and autumn which may be had an occasional variety during the rainy season and in the early dry season due to the rapid spread of insects similar to results mentioned by (Higgin, 1983), (Mahran, 2004), (Mahmoud M., 2008), When using molecular method (PCR) in this study TBR-PCR (86.6%) was the more specific and sensitive method of the all methods used during this study, TBR primers can be utilized routinely as an indication for early detection of animal reservoirs in the acute and chronic phases, that helps in rapid treatment of diseased animals and/or disposal of reservoirs of infection (Fernández et al., 2009, Pruvot et al., 2010).

 

However, this study revealed that many camels were negative by blood examination but positive by TBR-PCR, which may be related to low parasitaemia and/or low sensitivity of the stained blood smear technique and indicates that low parasitaemia might be due to early infections, chronic infection and/or lower strain virulence. The high proportion of non-clinical infection of T. evansi among the investigated camels was in agreement with the findings in the Upper Egypt of (Mahran, 2004).

 

Generally, the percentage of detection and the sensitivity of the PCR is variable depending upon the primers employed, which are determined by the number of copies and the homology of the primers with the target sequence (Fernández et al., 2009).

 

The negative samples RoTat1.2 PCR targets in this study agreed with some previous studies (Elhaig et al., 2013), and these negative results may be due to the trypanosomes may be Trypanosoma evansi type B (lacks of RoTat genome)which detected in Sudan (Salim et al., 2011) or may the sequence assorted variety of the RoTat1.2 gene in Egyptian trypanosome detected from camels, especially in relationship with parasite long perseverance in camels because of the chronic period of the disease (Amer et al., 2011).

 

The suspected camel showed significant decreases in total erythrocytes count (TEC), hemoglobin (Hb), and a non significant increase in total leucocyte count (TLC), There was a significant increase in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Total protein, globulin show a significant increase while glucose, Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) level didn’t differ significantly in suspected camels than healthy ones. The hematological and biochemical parameters changes are similar to (Hilali et al., 2006), (Eljalii et al., 2015), and differ to (Omer et al., 2007).

 

CONCLUSION

 

Finally, according to this study we can say that trypanosomiasis in camels was prevalent in Aswan, either by clinical and non-clinical cases and therefore, reliable diagnosis should be used for rapid treatment or control of the disease., the clinical examination of camels suspected with trypanosoma not a reliable method, the Microscopic examination frequently used for diagnosis of trypanosoma infections had low sensitivity. and depends on the acuteness of the case, high parasitaemia and the good technician skills, while the use of FGT as a field test for diagnosis of trypanosomiasis in camels, it is easy to apply, but it is non-specific technique because it depends on the presence of high amount immunoglobulin's which may occur in any other chronic disease. The TBR-PCR test is the more reliable and easy technique for diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi (more specific and sensitive method). The all negative samples obtained by using RoTaT1.2- PCR test revealed presence of Trypanosoma evansi type B which lack to VSG which recently detected in Kenya, Ethiopia, and Sudan, or it may be any other trypanosomes except T. evansi type A. and Camel blood is consider as a mirror of the physiological or adverse conditions the heamatological and biochemical parameters changed due to the infection camels by trypanosomiasis. And recommended that Should Use of a simple PCR-based technique for routine field diagnosis of Trypanosoma for early detection, treatment, and control. Need for more investigation of T. evansi by using of suitable PCR test primers to determine the presence of T. evansi type B isolates, T. b. brucei and presence of T. evansi type A without RoTat 1.2 gene in Egyptian isolates. 

 

REFERENCES

 

Amer, S.; Ryu, O.; Tada, C.; Fukuda, Y.; Inoue, N. and Nakai, Y. (2011): Molecular-identification and phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma evansi from dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Egypt, a pilot study. Acta Trop. Vol. 117, P. 39–46.

Aslam, A.; Chaudhary, Z.I.; Rehman, H.; Ashraf, K.; Ahmad, N.; Yaqub, T.; Maqbool, A. and Shakoori, A. (2010): Comparative Evaluation of Parasitological, Serological and DNA Amplification Methods for Diagnosis of Natural Trypanosomal Infection in Equines, Pakistan J. Zool., vol. 42(4),: 371-376.

Baticados, W.N.; Fernandez, C.P. and Baticados, A.M. (2011): Molecular Detection of Trypanosoma evansi in Cattle from Quirino Province, Philippines. Veterinarski Arhiv. 81, P. 635-646

Bancroft, J.D.; Stevens, A. and Turner, D.R. (1996): Theory and practice of histological techniques. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York, USA.

Brit J. Haemat (1967): International committee for standardization in hematology, 13 (suppl.)71.

Burtis A. Tietz (1999): Textbook of clinical chemistry, 3 rd ed, AACC.

Chappuis, F.; Mueller, Y.; Nguimfack, A.; Rwakimari, J. B.; Couffignal, S. and Boelaert, M. (2005): Diagnostic accuracy of two rK39 antigen-based dipsticks and the formal gel test for rapid diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in northeastern Uganda. J. Clin. Microbiol., Vol.43, P. 5973–5977

Chaudhary, S.S.; Gupta, S.K.; Kunhipurayil, SH.; Singh, A. and Gupta, J. (2010): Polymerase chain reaction based detection of Trypanosoma evansi in whole blood of domestic animals, 22nd National Congress of Parasitology, Dept. of Zoology, University of Kalyani, W.B., P. 302-304

Claes, F.; Radwanska, M.; Majiwa, P.A.O.; Goddeeris, B. and Büscher, P. (2004): Variable Surface Glycoprotein RoTat 1.2 PCR as a specific diagnostic tool for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi infections, Kinetoplastid Biology and Disease, P. 3-3 https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9292-3-3

Desquesnes, M.; Holzmuller, P.; De-Hua, L.; Dargantes, A.; Lun, Z. and Jittaplapong, S. (2013): Trypanosoma evansi and Surra: A Review and Perspectives on Origin, History, Distribution, Taxonomy, Morphology, Hosts, and Pathogenic Effects, Biomed Res Int., 194176.

Dargantes, A.P.; Reid, S.A. and Copeman, D.B. (2005): Experimental Trypanosoma evansi infection in the goat. II Pathology. J. Comp. Pathol. Vol.133, P.267–276 http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021997505000708

ECCLS (1989): Determination of the catalytic activity concentration in serum on l- aspartate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1, AST) clin. Chem., Vol. 20: p. 204-211.

Egbe-Nwiyi, T.N.; Igbokwe, I.O. and Onyeyili, P.A. (2005): Pathogenicity of Trypanosoma congolense infection following oral calcium chloride administration in rats. African Journal of Biomedical Research. Vol.8, P. 197-201

Elhaig, M.M.; Youssef, A.I. and El-Gayar, A.K. (2013): Molecular and parasitological detection of Trypanosoma evansi in Camels in Ismailia, Egypt a Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, 41522., P 214-218.

Eljalii, I.M.; EL-Deeb, W.M.; Fouda, T.A.; Almujalli, A.M. and El-Bahr, S.M. (2015): Blood Picture and selected oxidative stress biomarkers in dromedary camels naturally infected with Trypanosoma evansi; International Journal of Veterinary Sciences Research, Vol.1, P. 46-53

Enwezor, F.N.C. and Sackey, A.K.B. (2005): Camel trypanosomosis a review. Veterinarski Arch., 75, P.439-452

Eyob, E. and Matios, L. (2013): Review on camel trypanosomosis (surra) due to Trypanosoma evansi: Epidemiology and host response academic journals. V.5, P. 334-343

Fernández, D.; González, B.; Eleizalde, M.; González, M.E.; Perrone, T. and Mendoza, M. (2009): Trypanosoma evansi a comparison of PCR and parasitological diagnostic tests in experimentally infected mice. Exp. Parasitol. V.121, P. 1–7

Gonzales, J.L.; Chacon, E.; Miranda, M.; Lozaand, A. and Siles, L.M. (2007): Bovine trypanosomosis in the Bolivian Pantanal. Veterinary Parasitology, V.146, P. 9-16.

Higgin, S. (1983): Observations on the diseases of the Arabian camel (Camelus dromedarius) and their control. Vet. Bull.V. 53(12), P. 1089 – 1100.

Hilali, M.; Abdel-Gawad, A.; Nassar, A. and Abdel-Wahab, A. (2006): Hematological and biochemical changes in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) infected with Trypanosoma evansi, Veterinary Parasitology V.139, P. 237–243.

Ian, M.; Holmes, P.H.; ‎Michael, A. and Miles (2004): The trypanosomiasis, p 1-5 https://books.google.com.eg/books?id=6Z1zUWY9LroC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Sex+and+evolution+in+trypanosomes.+Wendy+Gibson,+International+Journal+for+Parasitology,+1+May+2001&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjgmqeWm9_WAhXKJcAKHQwADOwQ6AEIODAE#v=onepage&q&f=false

IFCC (1986): Expert panel on enzymes part3, J clin. chem., clin. Biochem., Vol. 24: 481-495

Ijaz, M.K.; Nur-e-Kamal, M.S.A.; Mohamed, A.I.A. and Dar, F.K. (1998): Comparative studies on the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction and microscopic examination for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi in the experimentally infected mice. Comparative Immunol. Microbio. And Infectious Diseases, V.21, P. 215-223.

Kaplan, A. and Szabo, J. (1983): clinical chemistry, interpretation and techniques, 2 nd ed: 157.

Konnai, S.; Mekata, H.; Mingala, C.N.; Abes, N.S.; Gutierrez, C.A. and Herrera, R.V. (2009): Development and application of a quantitative real-time PCR for the diagnosis of Surra in water buffaloes. Infect. Genet. E V. 9, P. 449–452

Leadbeater, B.S.C.; Green, T.J.C. and Cready, M.c., S.M.M. (2000): The Flagellates. Unity, diversity and evolution. Ed., London, P. 12

Luckins, A.G. (1992): Methods for diagnosis of trypanosomiasis in livestock. World Animal Review, P.70-71

Mahmoud, M.A.; Amin, M.M.; Youssef, R.R.; El-Kattan, A.; Azza, S.A.G. and Abou El-Naga, T.R. (2008): Studies on some endoparasites of camels in the southeastern area of Egypt,Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases Fac. of Vet. Med. Cairo Univ., animal Health Department, Desert Research Center, SCVMJ, XIII (1): 81-92.

Mahran O.M. (2004): Some studies on blood parasites in camels (Camelus dromedarius) at Shalatin City, Red Sea Governorate. Assiut Vet. Med., V.50, P.172-184

Masiga, D.K.; Smyth, A.J.; Hayes, P.; Bromidge, T.J. and Gibson, W.C. (1992): Sensitive detection of trypanosomes in tsetse flies by DNA amplification. Int. J. Parasitol., V.22, P. 909–918.

Njiru, Z.K.; Constantine, C.C.; Masiga, D.K.; Reid, S.A.; Thompson, R.C. and Gibson, W.C. (2006): Characterization of Trypanosoma evansi type B. Infect Genet, V.6, P. 292-300 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567134805000420

OIE World Organization for Animal Health Terrestrial Manual (2012): Trypanosoma evansi infections (including Surra) Chapter 2.1.17. OIE, Paris.

Omer, O.H.; Mousa, H.M. and Al-Wabel, N. (2007): Study on the antioxidant status of rats experimentally infected with Trypanosoma evansi Veterinary Parasitology, V.145, P. 142–145

Pruvot, M.; Kamyingkird, K.; Desquesnes, M.; Sarataphan, N. and Jittapalapong, S. (2010): a comparison of six primer sets for detection of Trypanosoma evansi by polymerase chain reaction in rodents and Thai livestock. Vet Parasitol, V.171, P.185-193

Salim,  B.; Bakheit, M.A.; Kamau, J.; Nakamura, I. and Sugimoto, C. (2011): Molecular epidemiology of camel trypanosomiasis based on ITS1 rDNA and RoTat 1.2 VSG gene in the Sudan, Parasites & Vectors, P 4:31 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-31

Sambrook, J. and Russell (2001): Molecular coloning. A Laboratory Manual, Third Edition, V. 3, New York.

Sarataphan, N.; Vongpakorn, M.; Bandit, N.; Autarkoo, N.; Keowkarnkah, T.; Rodtian, P.; Stich, R.W. and Jittapalapong, S. (2007): Diagnosis of a Trypanosoma lewisi-like (Herpetosoma) infection in a sick infant from Thailand. J. Med. Microbiol., V. 56, P.1118–1121

Shahzad, W.;Munir, R.;Khan, M.S.; Ahmad, M.D., Ijaz, M.; Ahmad, A. and Iqbal, M. (2010): Prevalence and molecular diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi in Nili-Ravi buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) in different districts of Punjab (Pakistan), Tropical Animal Health and Production ,Volume 42,  P.1597–1599

Tehseen, S.; Nusrat, G.; Qamar, M.F.; Desquesnes, M.; Shahazad, M.I.; Deborggraeve, S. and Buscher, P. (2015): parasitological, serological and molecular survey of Trypanosoma evansi infection in dromedary camels from Cholistan Desert, Pakistan, parasit vectors, Vol.8: 415.

Tietz, N.W. (1990): Clinical guide to laboratory tests 2 nd ed, Philadelphia, WB saunders, 566

Tietz, N.W. (1994): Fundamentals of clinical chemistry, 2 nd ed,: 692.

Tietz, N.W. (1995): Clinical guide to laboratory tests, 3 rd ed, AACC.

Young, D.S. (1990): Effects of drugs on clinical laboratory tests. 3rd edition, 3: 6-12.

Young, D.S. (1995): Effects of drugs on clinical lab Tests, 4 th ed, AACC press.

Young, D.S. (2001): Effects of disease on clinical lab Tests, 4 th ed, AACC.

 

 

 

 

التشخيص السريري والطفيلي والمصلّي والجزيئي لداء التريبانوسوما في الإبل (الجمال وحيدة السنم)

 

منى عزب شحات عبد العليم ، عادلالسيدأحمدمحمد ، الصغيرعمرانأحمدعلي ،

 حسنيوسفعبدالحميدمحمود

 

E-mail: monaazab2006@yahoo.com        Assiut University web-site: www.aun.edu.eg

 

داء التريبانوسوما هومن أکثر الأمراض انتشاراً في الإبل ، وقد أجريت هذه الدراسة على 106 جمل ذو سنم واحد (Camelus dromedarius) في أسوان. أظهرت النتائج ان  18جمل (17٪) من الإبل بها  بعض الأعراض السريرية لمرض التريبانوسوما مثل الضعف ، والأغشية المخاطية الشاحبة ، وفقر الدم ، وضمور السنام والأضلاع البارزة ، والحمى ، والعين المائي ، والإسهال ، وکذلک بالفحص المجهري ظهرت المثقبيات في 7 افلام من الدم الملون من الجمال (6.6 ٪) ، في حين أن الأمصال اعطى 13 جمل (12.26 ٪) من الإبل نتائج إيجابية باستخدام  FGT (اختبار هلام الفورمالين) بما في ذلک عينة واحدة فقط إيجابية عن طريق اختبار فيلم الدم. عند استخدام اختبار PCR تم اختبار 15 جمل ووجد أن (13) 86.7٪ منها إيجابية لوجود جينوم TBR. کانت جميع العينات (15 عينة) سلبية باختبار RoTat1.2 ، وقد تکون نتائج PCR بسبب التريبانوسومات قد تکون نوع من المثقبيات evansi B (نقص جينوم RoTat) والذي قد يکون تم إدخاله حديثًا إلى مصر أو قد يکون متسلسلًا متنوعًا من RoTat1.2. او تم اکتشاف الجين في التريبانوسوم المصري من الجمال ، خاصة مع طول المدة في الحالات المزمنة من المرض. لذلک ، کان TBR-PCR الطريقة الأکثر تحديدًا وحساسية لکل الطرق المستخدمة أثناء هذه الدراسة.

 

أظهر الجمل المصاب انخفاضًا ملحوظًا في TEC عدد خلايا الدم الحمراء والهيموجلوبين ، وزيادة کبيرة في عدد خلايا الدم البيضاء TLC ، الايزينوفيل. کان هناک انخفاض کبير في ترکيزات الجلوکوز ، انزيمات الکبد من مستويات ألانين أمينو ترانسامينيز ومستويات الاسبرتات الامينية الناقلةALT) ، AST) ، البروتين الکلي ، تظهر الجلوبيولين زيادة کبيرة في حين أن مستوى الألبومين لم يختلف بشکل کبير.

 

 
Amer, S.; Ryu, O.; Tada, C.; Fukuda, Y.; Inoue, N. and Nakai, Y. (2011): Molecular-identification and phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma evansi from dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Egypt, a pilot study. Acta Trop. Vol. 117, P. 39–46.
Aslam, A.; Chaudhary, Z.I.; Rehman, H.; Ashraf, K.; Ahmad, N.; Yaqub, T.; Maqbool, A. and Shakoori, A. (2010): Comparative Evaluation of Parasitological, Serological and DNA Amplification Methods for Diagnosis of Natural Trypanosomal Infection in Equines, Pakistan J. Zool., vol. 42(4),: 371-376.
Baticados, W.N.; Fernandez, C.P. and Baticados, A.M. (2011): Molecular Detection of Trypanosoma evansi in Cattle from Quirino Province, Philippines. Veterinarski Arhiv. 81, P. 635-646
Bancroft, J.D.; Stevens, A. and Turner, D.R. (1996): Theory and practice of histological techniques. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York, USA.
Brit J. Haemat (1967): International committee for standardization in hematology, 13 (suppl.)71.
Burtis A. Tietz (1999): Textbook of clinical chemistry, 3 rd ed, AACC.
Chappuis, F.; Mueller, Y.; Nguimfack, A.; Rwakimari, J. B.; Couffignal, S. and Boelaert, M. (2005): Diagnostic accuracy of two rK39 antigen-based dipsticks and the formal gel test for rapid diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in northeastern Uganda. J. Clin. Microbiol., Vol.43, P. 5973–5977
Chaudhary, S.S.; Gupta, S.K.; Kunhipurayil, SH.; Singh, A. and Gupta, J. (2010): Polymerase chain reaction based detection of Trypanosoma evansi in whole blood of domestic animals, 22nd National Congress of Parasitology, Dept. of Zoology, University of Kalyani, W.B., P. 302-304
Claes, F.; Radwanska, M.; Majiwa, P.A.O.; Goddeeris, B. and Büscher, P. (2004): Variable Surface Glycoprotein RoTat 1.2 PCR as a specific diagnostic tool for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi infections, Kinetoplastid Biology and Disease, P. 3-3 https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9292-3-3
Desquesnes, M.; Holzmuller, P.; De-Hua, L.; Dargantes, A.; Lun, Z. and Jittaplapong, S. (2013): Trypanosoma evansi and Surra: A Review and Perspectives on Origin, History, Distribution, Taxonomy, Morphology, Hosts, and Pathogenic Effects, Biomed Res Int., 194176.
Dargantes, A.P.; Reid, S.A. and Copeman, D.B. (2005): Experimental Trypanosoma evansi infection in the goat. II Pathology. J. Comp. Pathol. Vol.133, P.267–276 http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021997505000708
ECCLS (1989): Determination of the catalytic activity concentration in serum on l- aspartate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1, AST) clin. Chem., Vol. 20: p. 204-211.
Egbe-Nwiyi, T.N.; Igbokwe, I.O. and Onyeyili, P.A. (2005): Pathogenicity of Trypanosoma congolense infection following oral calcium chloride administration in rats. African Journal of Biomedical Research. Vol.8, P. 197-201
Elhaig, M.M.; Youssef, A.I. and El-Gayar, A.K. (2013): Molecular and parasitological detection of Trypanosoma evansi in Camels in Ismailia, Egypt a Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, 41522., P 214-218.
Eljalii, I.M.; EL-Deeb, W.M.; Fouda, T.A.; Almujalli, A.M. and El-Bahr, S.M. (2015): Blood Picture and selected oxidative stress biomarkers in dromedary camels naturally infected with Trypanosoma evansi; International Journal of Veterinary Sciences Research, Vol.1, P. 46-53
Enwezor, F.N.C. and Sackey, A.K.B. (2005): Camel trypanosomosis a review. Veterinarski Arch., 75, P.439-452
Eyob, E. and Matios, L. (2013): Review on camel trypanosomosis (surra) due to Trypanosoma evansi: Epidemiology and host response academic journals. V.5, P. 334-343
Fernández, D.; González, B.; Eleizalde, M.; González, M.E.; Perrone, T. and Mendoza, M. (2009): Trypanosoma evansi a comparison of PCR and parasitological diagnostic tests in experimentally infected mice. Exp. Parasitol. V.121, P. 1–7
Gonzales, J.L.; Chacon, E.; Miranda, M.; Lozaand, A. and Siles, L.M. (2007): Bovine trypanosomosis in the Bolivian Pantanal. Veterinary Parasitology, V.146, P. 9-16.
Higgin, S. (1983): Observations on the diseases of the Arabian camel (Camelus dromedarius) and their control. Vet. Bull.V. 53(12), P. 1089 – 1100.
Hilali, M.; Abdel-Gawad, A.; Nassar, A. and Abdel-Wahab, A. (2006): Hematological and biochemical changes in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) infected with Trypanosoma evansi, Veterinary Parasitology V.139, P. 237–243.
IFCC (1986): Expert panel on enzymes part3, J clin. chem., clin. Biochem., Vol. 24: 481-495
Ijaz, M.K.; Nur-e-Kamal, M.S.A.; Mohamed, A.I.A. and Dar, F.K. (1998): Comparative studies on the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction and microscopic examination for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi in the experimentally infected mice. Comparative Immunol. Microbio. And Infectious Diseases, V.21, P. 215-223.
Kaplan, A. and Szabo, J. (1983): clinical chemistry, interpretation and techniques, 2 nd ed: 157.
Konnai, S.; Mekata, H.; Mingala, C.N.; Abes, N.S.; Gutierrez, C.A. and Herrera, R.V. (2009): Development and application of a quantitative real-time PCR for the diagnosis of Surra in water buffaloes. Infect. Genet. E V. 9, P. 449–452
Leadbeater, B.S.C.; Green, T.J.C. and Cready, M.c., S.M.M. (2000): The Flagellates. Unity, diversity and evolution. Ed., London, P. 12
Luckins, A.G. (1992): Methods for diagnosis of trypanosomiasis in livestock. World Animal Review, P.70-71
Mahmoud, M.A.; Amin, M.M.; Youssef, R.R.; El-Kattan, A.; Azza, S.A.G. and Abou El-Naga, T.R. (2008): Studies on some endoparasites of camels in the southeastern area of Egypt,Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases Fac. of Vet. Med. Cairo Univ., animal Health Department, Desert Research Center, SCVMJ, XIII (1): 81-92.
Mahran O.M. (2004): Some studies on blood parasites in camels (Camelus dromedarius) at Shalatin City, Red Sea Governorate. Assiut Vet. Med., V.50, P.172-184
Masiga, D.K.; Smyth, A.J.; Hayes, P.; Bromidge, T.J. and Gibson, W.C. (1992): Sensitive detection of trypanosomes in tsetse flies by DNA amplification. Int. J. Parasitol., V.22, P. 909–918.
Njiru, Z.K.; Constantine, C.C.; Masiga, D.K.; Reid, S.A.; Thompson, R.C. and Gibson, W.C. (2006): Characterization of Trypanosoma evansi type B. Infect Genet, V.6, P. 292-300 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567134805000420
OIE World Organization for Animal Health Terrestrial Manual (2012): Trypanosoma evansi infections (including Surra) Chapter 2.1.17. OIE, Paris.
Omer, O.H.; Mousa, H.M. and Al-Wabel, N. (2007): Study on the antioxidant status of rats experimentally infected with Trypanosoma evansi Veterinary Parasitology, V.145, P. 142–145
Pruvot, M.; Kamyingkird, K.; Desquesnes, M.; Sarataphan, N. and Jittapalapong, S. (2010): a comparison of six primer sets for detection of Trypanosoma evansi by polymerase chain reaction in rodents and Thai livestock. Vet Parasitol, V.171, P.185-193

Salim,  B.; Bakheit, M.A.; Kamau, J.; Nakamura, I. and Sugimoto, C. (2011): Molecular epidemiology of camel trypanosomiasis based on ITS1 rDNA and RoTat 1.2 VSG gene in the Sudan, Parasites & Vectors, P 4:31 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-31

Sambrook, J. and Russell (2001): Molecular coloning. A Laboratory Manual, Third Edition, V. 3, New York.
Sarataphan, N.; Vongpakorn, M.; Bandit, N.; Autarkoo, N.; Keowkarnkah, T.; Rodtian, P.; Stich, R.W. and Jittapalapong, S. (2007): Diagnosis of a Trypanosoma lewisi-like (Herpetosoma) infection in a sick infant from Thailand. J. Med. Microbiol., V. 56, P.1118–1121
Shahzad, W.;Munir, R.;Khan, M.S.; Ahmad, M.D., Ijaz, M.; Ahmad, A. and Iqbal, M. (2010): Prevalence and molecular diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi in Nili-Ravi buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) in different districts of Punjab (Pakistan), Tropical Animal Health and Production ,Volume 42,  P.1597–1599
Tehseen, S.; Nusrat, G.; Qamar, M.F.; Desquesnes, M.; Shahazad, M.I.; Deborggraeve, S. and Buscher, P. (2015): parasitological, serological and molecular survey of Trypanosoma evansi infection in dromedary camels from Cholistan Desert, Pakistan, parasit vectors, Vol.8: 415.
Tietz, N.W. (1990): Clinical guide to laboratory tests 2 nd ed, Philadelphia, WB saunders, 566
Tietz, N.W. (1994): Fundamentals of clinical chemistry, 2 nd ed,: 692.
Tietz, N.W. (1995): Clinical guide to laboratory tests, 3 rd ed, AACC.
Young, D.S. (1990): Effects of drugs on clinical laboratory tests. 3rd edition, 3: 6-12.
Young, D.S. (1995): Effects of drugs on clinical lab Tests, 4 th ed, AACC press.
Young, D.S. (2001): Effects of disease on clinical lab Tests, 4 th ed, AACC.